Literature DB >> 25313660

Regional white matter variation associated with domain-specific metacognitive accuracy.

Benjamin Baird1, Matthew Cieslak, Jonathan Smallwood, Scott T Grafton, Jonathan W Schooler.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms that mediate metacognitive ability (the capacity to accurately reflect on one's own cognition and experience) remain poorly understood. An important question is whether metacognitive capacity is a domain-general skill supported by a core neuroanatomical substrate or whether regionally specific neural structures underlie accurate reflection in different cognitive domains. Providing preliminary support for the latter possibility, recent findings have shown that individual differences in metacognitive ability in the domains of memory and perception are related to variation in distinct gray matter volume and resting-state functional connectivity. The current investigation sought to build on these findings by evaluating how metacognitive ability in these domains is related to variation in white matter microstructure. We quantified metacognitive ability across memory and perception domains and used diffusion spectrum imaging to examine the relation between high-resolution measurements of white matter microstructure and individual differences in metacognitive accuracy in each domain. We found that metacognitive accuracy for perceptual decisions and memory were uncorrelated across individuals and that metacognitive accuracy in each domain was related to variation in white matter microstructure in distinct brain areas. Metacognitive accuracy for perceptual decisions was associated with increased diffusion anisotropy in white matter underlying the ACC, whereas metacognitive accuracy for memory retrieval was associated with increased diffusion anisotropy in the white matter extending into the inferior parietal lobule. Together, these results extend previous findings linking metacognitive ability in the domains of perception and memory to variation in distinct brain structures and connections.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25313660     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Florent Meyniel; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Correlated individual differences suggest a common mechanism underlying metacognition in visual perception and visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Substrates of metacognition on perception and metacognition on higher-order cognition relate to different subsystems of the mentalizing network.

Authors:  Sofie L Valk; Boris C Bernhardt; Anne Böckler; Philipp Kanske; Tania Singer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Changes in ventromedial prefrontal and insular cortex support the development of metamemory from childhood into adolescence.

Authors:  Yana Fandakova; Diana Selmeczy; Sarah Leckey; Kevin J Grimm; Carter Wendelken; Silvia A Bunge; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements.

Authors:  Anthony G Vaccaro; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-11-13

7.  Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Marion Rouault; Andrew McWilliams; Micah G Allen; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12

8.  Representing Representation: Integration between the Temporal Lobe and the Posterior Cingulate Influences the Content and Form of Spontaneous Thought.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Theodoros Karapanagiotidis; Florence Ruby; Barbara Medea; Irene de Caso; Mahiko Konishi; Hao-Ting Wang; Glyn Hallam; Daniel S Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Metacognitive Deficiency in a Perceptual but Not a Memory Task in Methadone Maintenance Patients.

Authors:  Saeedeh Sadeghi; Hamed Ekhtiari; Bahador Bahrami; Majid Nili Ahmadabadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.

Authors:  Audrey Mazancieux; Stephen M Fleming; Céline Souchay; Chris J A Moulin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.