Literature DB >> 25313657

Levels of processing in working memory: differential involvement of frontotemporal networks.

Nathan S Rose1, Fergus I M Craik, Bradley R Buchsbaum.   

Abstract

How does the brain maintain to-be-remembered information in working memory (WM), particularly when the focus of attention is drawn to processing other information? Cognitive models of WM propose that when items are displaced from focal attention recall involves retrieval from long-term memory (LTM). In this fMRI study, we tried to clarify the role of LTM in performance on a WM task and the type of representation that is used to maintain an item in WM during rehearsal-filled versus distractor-filled delays. Participants made a deep or shallow levels-of-processing (LOP) decision about a single word at encoding and tried to recall the word after a delay filled with either rehearsal of the word or a distracting math task. Recalling one word after 10 sec of distraction demonstrated behavioral and neural indices of retrieval from LTM (i.e., LOP effects and medial-temporal lobe activity). In contrast, recall after rehearsal activated cortical areas that reflected reporting the word from focal attention. In addition, areas that showed an LOP effect at encoding (e.g., left ventrolateral VLPFC and the anterior temporal lobes [ATLs]) were reactivated at recall, especially when recall followed distraction. Moreover, activity in left VLPFC during encoding, left ATL during the delay, and left hippocampus during retrieval predicted recall success after distraction. Whereas shallow LOP and rehearsal-related areas supported active maintenance of one item in focal attention, the behavioral processes and neural substrates that support LTM supported recall of one item after it was displaced from focal attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25313657     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Nathan S Rose; Tiffany Deschamps; Rosie C Leigh; Lilia Panamsky; Alexandra Silberberg; Noushin Madani; Kira A Links
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

2.  Does Controlling for Temporal Parameters Change the Levels-of-Processing Effect in Working Memory?

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  Aging and Sequential Strategy Interference: A Magnetoencephalography Study in Arithmetic Problem Solving.

Authors:  Angélique Roquet; Thomas Hinault; Jean-Michel Badier; Patrick Lemaire
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  From perceptual to lexico-semantic analysis--cortical plasticity enabling new levels of processing.

Authors:  Lara Schlaffke; Naima N Rüther; Stefanie Heba; Lauren M Haag; Thomas Schultz; Katharina Rosengarth; Martin Tegenthoff; Christian Bellebaum; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.