S Jane Henley1, Dafna Kanny2, Katherine B Roland3, Melissa Grossman3, Brandy Peaker3, Yong Liu2, Susan M Gapstur4, Mary C White3, Marcus Plescia3. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA skh3@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To understand how US cancer control plans address alcohol use, an important but frequently overlooked cancer risk factor, and how many US adults are at risk. METHODS: We reviewed alcohol control efforts in 69 comprehensive cancer control plans in US states, tribes and jurisdictions. Using the 2011 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed the prevalence of current alcohol use among US adults and the proportion of these drinkers who exceeded guidelines for moderate drinking. RESULTS: Most comprehensive cancer control plans acknowledged alcohol use as a cancer risk factor but fewer than half included a goal, objective or strategy to address alcohol use. More than half of US adults reported current alcohol use in 2011, and two of three drinkers exceeded moderate drinking guidelines at least once in the past month. Many states that did not address alcohol use in comprehensive cancer control plans also had a high proportion of adults at risk. CONCLUSION: Alcohol use is a common cancer risk factor in the USA, but alcohol control strategies are not commonly included in comprehensive cancer control plans. Supporting the implementation of evidence-based strategies to prevent the excessive use of alcohol is one tool the cancer control community can use to reduce the risk of cancer. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Medical Council on Alcohol 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
AIMS: To understand how US cancer control plans address alcohol use, an important but frequently overlooked cancer risk factor, and how many US adults are at risk. METHODS: We reviewed alcohol control efforts in 69 comprehensive cancer control plans in US states, tribes and jurisdictions. Using the 2011 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed the prevalence of current alcohol use among US adults and the proportion of these drinkers who exceeded guidelines for moderate drinking. RESULTS: Most comprehensive cancer control plans acknowledged alcohol use as a cancer risk factor but fewer than half included a goal, objective or strategy to address alcohol use. More than half of US adults reported current alcohol use in 2011, and two of three drinkers exceeded moderate drinking guidelines at least once in the past month. Many states that did not address alcohol use in comprehensive cancer control plans also had a high proportion of adults at risk. CONCLUSION:Alcohol use is a common cancer risk factor in the USA, but alcohol control strategies are not commonly included in comprehensive cancer control plans. Supporting the implementation of evidence-based strategies to prevent the excessive use of alcohol is one tool the cancer control community can use to reduce the risk of cancer. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Medical Council on Alcohol 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Tim Stockwell; Susan Donath; Mark Cooper-Stanbury; Tanya Chikritzhs; Paul Catalano; Cid Mateo Journal: Addiction Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Lela R McKnight-Eily; S Jane Henley; Patricia P Green; Erika C Odom; Daniel W Hungerford Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Mary C White; Meredith L Shoemaker; Sohyun Park; Linda J Neff; Susan A Carlson; David R Brown; Dafna Kanny Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Su Yon Jung; Jeanette C Papp; Eric M Sobel; Matteo Pellegrini; Herbert Yu; Zuo-Feng Zhang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 4.379