Literature DB >> 25313056

Equity theory and fair inequality: a neuroeconomic study.

Alexander W Cappelen1, Tom Eichele2, Kenneth Hugdahl3, Karsten Specht4, Erik Ø Sørensen5, Bertil Tungodden1.   

Abstract

The present paper reports results from, to our knowledge, the first study designed to examine the neuronal responses to income inequality in situations in which individuals have made different contributions in terms of work effort. We conducted an experiment that included a prescanning phase in which the participants earned money by working, and a neuronal scanning phase in which we examined how the brain responded when the participants evaluated different distributions of their earnings. We provide causal evidence for the relative contribution of work effort being crucial for understanding the hemodynamic response in the brain to inequality. We found a significant hemodynamic response in the striatum to deviations from the distribution of income that was proportional to work effort, but found no effect of deviations from the equal distribution of income. We also observed a striking correlation between the hemodynamic response in the striatum and the self-reported evaluation of the income distributions. Our results provide, to our knowledge, the first set of neuronal evidence for equity theory and suggest that people distinguish between fair and unfair inequalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  equity theory; fairness; inequality; striatum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25313056      PMCID: PMC4217432          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414602111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  The neural basis of romantic love.

Authors:  A Bartels; S Zeki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-11-27       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  A forced-attention dichotic listening fMRI study on 113 subjects.

Authors:  Kristiina Kompus; Karsten Specht; Lars Ersland; Hilde T Juvodden; Heidi van Wageningen; Kenneth Hugdahl; René Westerhausen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum.

Authors:  K Fliessbach; B Weber; P Trautner; T Dohmen; U Sunde; C E Elger; A Falk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations.

Authors:  William T Harbaugh; Ulrich Mayr; Daniel R Burghart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The right and the good: distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency.

Authors:  Ming Hsu; Cédric Anen; Steven R Quartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tricomi; Antonio Rangel; Colin F Camerer; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Frank Krueger; Roland Zahn; Matteo Pardini; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neuroanatomical correlates of pleasant and unpleasant emotion.

Authors:  R D Lane; E M Reiman; M M Bradley; P J Lang; G L Ahern; R J Davidson; G E Schwartz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks.

Authors:  Tom Eichele; Stefan Debener; Vince D Calhoun; Karsten Specht; Andreas K Engel; Kenneth Hugdahl; D Yves von Cramon; Markus Ullsperger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  How Does Inequality Affect the Residents' Subjective Well-Being: Inequality of Opportunity and Inequality of Effort.

Authors:  Qizhi He; Hao Tong; Jia-Bao Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Moral consequences of becoming unemployed.

Authors:  Abigail Barr; Luis Miller; Paloma Ubeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Co-evolution of Honesty and Strategic Vigilance.

Authors:  Christophe Heintz; Mia Karabegovic; Andras Molnar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Listening to Rhythmic Music Reduces Connectivity within the Basal Ganglia and the Reward System.

Authors:  Hans P Brodal; Berge Osnes; Karsten Specht
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Are Individuals Luck Egalitarians? - An Experiment on the Influence of Brute and Option Luck on Social Preferences.

Authors:  Gustav Tinghög; David Andersson; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-29

6.  Fair payments for effective environmental conservation.

Authors:  Lasse Loft; Stefan Gehrig; Carl Salk; Jens Rommel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Neural signatures of cooperation enforcement and violation: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhong Yang; Ya Zheng; Guochun Yang; Qi Li; Xun Liu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  A quantitative method for benchmarking fair income distribution.

Authors:  Thitithep Sitthiyot; Kanyarat Holasut
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-03

9.  Inequality signals in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inform social preference models.

Authors:  Lisa Holper; Christopher J Burke; Christoph Fausch; Erich Seifritz; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.