Literature DB >> 25312825

Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size.

Eric R Cosman1, Joseph R Dolensky, Ryan A Hoffman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare radiofrequency (RF) heat lesion size across electrodes and generator settings available for interventional pain management.
METHODS: Monopolar lesions are generated ex vivo in animal tissue using sharp cannulae with tip diameters 23, 22, 20, 18, 16 gauge; tip lengths 5, 6, 10, 15 mm; set temperatures 60, 70, 80, 90°C; set times 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10 minutes. Lesions are generated using the RRE electrode, cooled RF, and parallel-tip bipolar RF for comparison. Lesion sizes are assessed by automated photographic temperature inference from over 400 lesions, using multiple lesions per configuration.
RESULTS: Monopolar lesion width and length increase with each factor (P < 0.001). Increasing cannula diameter from 22 to 16 gauge increases average lesion width 58-65% (3-4 mm) at 80°C and 2 minutes. Increasing temperature from 60°C to 90°C increases lesion width 108-152% at 2 minutes. Although dimensions grow most rapidly over the first minute, average lesion width is 11-20% larger at 2 minutes, and 23-32% larger at 3 minutes, compared with 1 minute. Lesion length extends distal and proximal to the tip, and exceeds tip length by 1-5 mm at 80°C and 2 minutes. Conventional 16 gauge cannulae at 80-90°C for 2-3 minutes generate lesions of average width similar to that produced by the cooled RF configuration proposed for sacroiliac joint denervation. Bipolar RF between parallel cannulae produces a rounded brick-shaped lesion of comparable shape to three sequential monopolar lesions generated using the same cannulae and generator settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Tip gauge, tip length, temperature, and time substantially affect RF lesion size. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Bipolar RF; Cooled RF; Neurotomy; Radiofrequency; Sacroiliac Joint; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312825     DOI: 10.1111/pme.12566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  32 in total

Review 1.  [Interventions on facet joints. Techniques of facet joint injection, medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation].

Authors:  J Artner; S Klessinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Use of Spinal Cord Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Quantify Neural Ablation and Evaluate Outcome after Percutaneous Cordotomy for Intractable Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Aditya Vedantam; Ping Hou; T Linda Chi; Patrick M Dougherty; Kenneth R Hess; Ashwin Viswanathan
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Near-infrared spectroscopy integrated catheter for characterization of myocardial tissues: preliminary demonstrations to radiofrequency ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Charles C Marboe; Christine P Hendon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  [Interdisciplinary position paper: the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain].

Authors:  Rudolf Likar; Johann Auer; Albert Chavanne; Wilfried Ilias; Michael Kern; Petra Krepler; Hans-Georg Kress; Ulrike Lischnig; Gernot Maurer; Oliver Sommer; Martin C Spendel; Siegfried Thurnher; Karl Wohak; Andreas Wolf; Michael Wölkhart
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Current Concepts and Future Directions of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Knee Pain.

Authors:  Daryl T Goldman; Rachel Piechowiak; Daniel Nissman; Sandeep Bagla; Ari Isaacson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  [Lumbar CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus of the spinal nerve : Anatomic study and description of a new technique].

Authors:  G C Feigl; C Mattersberger; W Rosmarin; R Likar; C Avila González
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  [Evidence-based interventional pain medicine : Progress over the past 10 years].

Authors:  Stephan Klessinger; Martin Legat; Markus Schneider
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Interventional Pain Management for Sacroiliac Tumors in the Oncologic Population: A Case Series and Paradigm Approach.

Authors:  Nathan Hutson; Joseph C Hung; Vinay Puttanniah; Eric Lis; Ilya Laufer; Amitabh Gulati
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.