Literature DB >> 25312749

Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians.

Alexa Hayley1, Lucy Zinkiewicz2, Kate Hardiman2.   

Abstract

Reduced consumption of meat, particularly red meat, is associated with numerous health benefits. While past research has examined demographic and cognitive correlates of meat-related diet identity and meat consumption behaviour, the predictive influence of personal values on meat-consumption attitudes and behaviour, as well as gender differences therein, has not been explicitly examined, nor has past research focusing on 'meat' generally addressed 'white meat' and 'fish/seafood' as distinct categories of interest. Two hundred and two Australians (59.9% female, 39.1% male, 1% unknown), aged 18 to 91 years (M = 31.42, SD = 16.18), completed an online questionnaire including the Schwartz Values Survey, and measures of diet identity, attitude towards reduced consumption of each of red meat, white meat, and fish/seafood, as well as self-reported estimates of frequency of consumption of each meat type. Results showed that higher valuing of Universalism predicted more positive attitudes towards reducing, and less frequent consumption of, each of red meat, white meat, and fish/seafood, while higher Power predicted less positive attitudes towards reducing, and more frequent consumption of, these meats. Higher Security predicted less positive attitudes towards reducing, and more frequent consumption, of white meat and fish/seafood, while Conformity produced this latter effect for fish/seafood only. Despite men valuing Power more highly than women, women valuing Universalism more highly than men, and men eating red meat more frequently than women, gender was not a significant moderator of the value-attitude-behaviour mediations described, suggesting that gender's effects on meat consumption may not be robust once entered into a multivariate model of MRD attitudes and behaviour. Results support past findings associating Universalism, Power, and Security values with meat-eating preferences, and extend these findings by articulating how these values relate specifically to different types of meat. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Behaviour; Diet; Fish; Meat; Values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312749     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Importance of Health Values Among Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Aliye B Cepni; Cherine Hatem; Tracey A Ledoux; Craig A Johnston
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2021-02-22

2.  Socio-Psychological Factors Associated with Young Australian Adults' Consumption of Energy Dense and Nutrient Poor (EDNP) Foods.

Authors:  Krupa Thammaiah Kombanda; Claire Margerison; Alison Booth; Anthony Worsley
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Consumer Preference Segments for Plant-Based Foods: The Role of Product Category.

Authors:  Armand V Cardello; Fabien Llobell; Davide Giacalone; Sok L Chheang; Sara R Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-01

4.  Residents' Physical Activities in Home Isolation and Its Relationship with Health Values and Well-Being: A Cross-Sectional Survey during the COVID-19 Social Quarantine.

Authors:  Yifan Zuo; Mu Zhang; Jiayu Han; Kevin W Chen; Zhanbing Ren
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Consumption patterns of meat, poultry, and fish after disaggregation of mixed dishes: secondary analysis of the Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011-12.

Authors:  Zhixian Sui; David Raubenheimer; Anna Rangan
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2017-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.