Literature DB >> 25312672

Endoscopic versus stereotactic procedure for pineal tumour biopsies: Comparative review of the literature and learning from a 25-year experience.

A Balossier1, S Blond2, G Touzet3, M Lefranc4, T de Saint-Denis3, C-A Maurage5, N Reyns3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Pineal tumours account for 1% to 4% of brain tumours in adults and for around 10% in children. Except in a few cases where germ cell markers are elevated, accurate histological samples are mandatory to initiate the treatment. Open surgery still has a high morbidity and is often needless. Biopsies can either be obtained by endoscopic or stereotactic procedures.
METHODS: Following an extensive review of the literature (PubMed 1970-2013; keywords pineal tumour, biopsy; English and French), 33 studies were analysed and relevant data compared regarding the type of procedure, diagnosis rate, cerebrospinal fluid diversion type and rate, perioperative mortality, morbidity.
RESULTS: Endoscopic and stereotactic biopsies showed a diagnosis rate of 81.1% (20%-100%) and 93.7% (82%-100%), respectively. Endoscopic biopsies involved 21.0% of minor and 2.0% of major complications whereas stereotactic biopsies involved 6.4% of minor and 1.6% of major complications. The most frequently reported complication was haemorrhage for both endoscopic and stereotactic procedures, accounting for 4.8% and 4.3%, respectively. Mortality rate was low for both endoscopic and stereotactic procedures, equal to 0.4% and 1.3%, respectively. Local experience of stereotactic biopsies was also reported and corroborated the previous data.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference between both procedures is not statistically significant (p>0.05) across large series (≥20patients). Nevertheless, tissue diagnosis appears less accurate with endoscopic procedures than with stereotactic procedures (81.1% versus 93.7%, weighted mean across all series). In our opinion, the neuroendoscopic approach is the best tool for managing hydrocephalus, whereas stereotactic biopsies remain the best way to obtain a tissue diagnosis with accuracy and low morbidity.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsie endoscopique; Biopsie stéréotaxique; Complication; Diagnosis accuracy; Endoscopic biopsy; Minimally invasive neurosurgery; Neurochirurgie mini-invasive; Pineal tumour; Précision diagnostique; Stereotactic biopsy; Tumeur de la région pinéale

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312672     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  13 in total

1.  A multiport MR-compatible neuroendoscope: spanning the gap between rigid and flexible scopes.

Authors:  Sunil Manjila; Margherita Mencattelli; Benoit Rosa; Karl Price; Georgios Fagogenis; Pierre E Dupont
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Outcome of single-trajectory rigid endoscopic third ventriculostomy and biopsy in the management algorithm of pineal region tumors: a case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abbassy; Khaled Aref; Ahmed Farhoud; Anwar Hekal
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  MRI features of pediatric intracranial germ cell tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Chih-Chun Wu; Wan-Yuo Guo; Feng-Chi Chang; Chao-Bao Luo; Han-Jui Lee; Yi-Wei Chen; Yi-Yen Lee; Tai-Tong Wong
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Neuroendoscopy in the management of pineal region tumours in children.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Deopujari; Krishna Shroff; Vikram Karmarkar; Chandan Mohanty
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Radiotherapy After Endoscopic Biopsy in an Adult with Pineocytoma, the Rare Brain Tumor in an Adult: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Chi-Chih Hsieh; Jui-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2022-06-18

6.  Endoscopic versus stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions involving the ventricles.

Authors:  Marcin Birski; Jacek Furtak; Kamil Krystkiewicz; Julita Birska; Karolina Zielinska; Paweł Sokal; Marcin Rusinek; Dariusz Paczkowski; Lukasz Szylberg; Marek Harat
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Management of pineal region tumors in a pediatric case series.

Authors:  Matthias Schulz; Melissa Afshar-Bakshloo; Arend Koch; David Capper; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Anna Tietze; Arne Grün; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  A bi-foraminal craniometric-guided approach to endoscopic third ventriculostomy and biopsy of a pineal tumour.

Authors:  Panduranga Seetahal-Maraj; Patrick Knight; Narindra Ramnarine
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-11-30

9.  Surgical strategy for symptomatic pineal cyst: is endoscopit third ventriculostomy necessary in addition to cyst fenestration?

Authors:  Kelechi Ndukuba; Toshihiro Ogiwara; Takuya Nakamura; Keisuke Kamiya; Yoshiki Hanaoka; Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi; Samuel Ohaegbulam; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.131

10.  Complications of stereotactic biopsy of lesions in the sellar region, pineal gland, and brainstem: A retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Xin Yu; Hulin Zhao; Weidong Cao; Hailong Li; Qinggang Li; Zhicaho Li; Feng Yin; Rui Liu; Jianning Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.