Kamalika Mojumdar1, Feng Liang1, Christian Giordano1, Christian Lemaire1, Gawiyou Danialou1, Tatsuma Okazaki1, Johanne Bourdon1, Moutih Rafei2, Jacques Galipeau3, Maziar Divangahi1, Basil J Petrof4. 1. Meakins-Christie Laboratories and Respiratory Division, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Meakins-Christie Laboratories and Respiratory Division, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada basil.petrof@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
Myofiber necrosis and fibrosis are hallmarks of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), leading to lethal weakness of the diaphragm. Macrophages (MPs) are required for successful muscle regeneration, but the role of inflammatory monocyte (MO)-derived MPs in either promoting or mitigating DMD is unclear. We show that DMD (mdx) mouse diaphragms exhibit greatly increased expression of CCR2 and its chemokine ligands, along with inflammatory (Ly6C(high)) MO recruitment and accumulation of CD11b(high) MO-derived MPs. Loss-of-function of CCR2 preferentially reduced this CD11b(high) MP population by impeding the release of Ly6C(high) MOs from the bone marrow but not the splenic reservoir. CCR2 deficiency also helped restore the MP polarization balance by preventing excessive skewing of MPs toward a proinflammatory phenotype. These effects were linked to amelioration of histopathological features and increased muscle strength in the diaphragm. Chronic inhibition of CCR2 signaling by mutated CCL2 secreted from implanted mesenchymal stem cells resulted in similar improvements. These data uncover a previously unrecognized role of inflammatory MOs in DMD pathogenesis and indicate that CCR2 inhibition could offer a novel strategy for DMD management.
Myofiber necrosis and fibrosis are hallmarks of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), leading to lethal weakness of the diaphragm. Macrophages (MPs) are required for successful muscle regeneration, but the role of inflammatory monocyte (MO)-derived MPs in either promoting or mitigating DMD is unclear. We show that DMD (mdx) mouse diaphragms exhibit greatly increased expression of CCR2 and its chemokine ligands, along with inflammatory (Ly6C(high)) MO recruitment and accumulation of CD11b(high) MO-derived MPs. Loss-of-function of CCR2 preferentially reduced this CD11b(high) MP population by impeding the release of Ly6C(high) MOs from the bone marrow but not the splenic reservoir. CCR2 deficiency also helped restore the MP polarization balance by preventing excessive skewing of MPs toward a proinflammatory phenotype. These effects were linked to amelioration of histopathological features and increased muscle strength in the diaphragm. Chronic inhibition of CCR2 signaling by mutated CCL2 secreted from implanted mesenchymal stem cells resulted in similar improvements. These data uncover a previously unrecognized role of inflammatory MOs in DMD pathogenesis and indicate that CCR2 inhibition could offer a novel strategy for DMD management.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common X-linked lethal disorder in humans, is caused by defects of the gene encoding dystrophin, a 427 kDa cytoskeletal protein found at the inner surface of the skeletal muscle surface membrane. The binding between dystrophin and its associated glycoprotein complex confers important structural and signal transduction properties to the muscle fiber (Petrof, 2002), the absence of which leads to muscle fiber necrosis that is followed by progressive fibrosis. The diaphragm and other respiratory muscles are also subjected to this process, and most patients with DMD die of respiratory muscle failure in early adulthood unless artificially supported by mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, in the naturally occurring murine model of DMD (the mdxmouse), which also lacks dystrophin, the diaphragm is severely affected from an early age and closely resembles the human phenotype with respect to relentless fiber loss, fibrosis, and reduced muscle strength (Stedman et al, 1991).The lack of dystrophin in skeletal muscles leads to multiple cellular defects, such as increased mechanical fragility of the muscle fiber membrane, increased calcium entry into the cell, and dysregulated nitric oxide signaling (Petrof, 2002). In addition, activated NF-κB and proinflammatory genes are upregulated within DMD muscles from shortly after birth (Chen et al, 2005). This early inflammatory response is followed in later stages by a failure of muscle regeneration with associated muscle fibrosis. In mdxmice, blockade of the NF-κB pathway (Messina et al, 2006; Acharyya et al, 2007) or inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Radley et al, 2008; Villalta et al, 2009) reduces muscle necrosis, suggesting that the host inflammatory response plays an important role in promoting muscle injury and subsequent fibrosis.Myeloid cells of the monocyte/macrophage (MO/MP) lineage constitute by far the predominant inflammatory cell type within DMD and mdx muscles (Spencer et al, 2001; Wehling et al, 2001). MOs originate from the bone marrow and traffic to peripheral tissues, where they differentiate into MPs with different functional characteristics (Ingersoll et al, 2011; Shi & Pamer, 2011). In mice, the cell surface marker Ly6C identifies a MO subset expressing high levels of CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), which binds members of the monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP) family of CC chemokines that are critically involved in MO/MP recruitment (Geissmann et al, 2003). In the setting of acute infectious or sterile tissue injury, Ly6Chigh (often referred to as ‘inflammatory’) MOs exit the bone marrow under the regulation of CCR2 (Ingersoll et al, 2011). Upon entry into tissues, these cells differentiate into MPs which may then become polarized toward a ‘classical inflammatory’ or alternatively activated ‘anti-inflammatory/wound-healing’ phenotype, depending upon complex environmental and other influences that are as yet poorly understood (Mosser & Edwards, 2008; Martinez et al, 2009; Sica & Mantovani, 2012). Excessive skewing toward inflammatory MPs in dystrophic muscles would be expected to increase their cytolytic effects upon muscle fibers and thus promote necrosis (Villalta et al, 2009). On the other hand, an overabundance of anti-inflammatory/wound-healing MPs can favor the development of muscle fibrosis (Vidal et al, 2008).It is well established that inhibition of CCR2 signaling reduces MP accumulation and impedes successful regeneration in normal muscles that are acutely injured (Warren et al, 2005; Contreras-Shannon et al, 2007; Sun et al, 2009). This is consistent with data indicating that MPs produce trophic factors which play an important supportive role in the repair and functional recovery of normal skeletal muscle (Saclier et al, 2013). However, the latter situation differs greatly from dystrophic muscles, which are characterized by a state of smoldering inflammation with chronically increased MP accumulation (Porter et al, 2002). It is unknown whether these abnormally abundant MPs are derived from CCR2-dependent blood-borne inflammatory Ly6Chigh MOs or a non-hematopoietic lineage of MPs that normally gives rise to the resident MP population (Schulz et al, 2012). In either case, the sustained MP infiltration of dystrophic muscles could be maladaptive and thus contribute to disease progression (Vidal et al, 2008; Villalta et al, 2009).In the present study, we sought to determine whether and how CCR2 inhibition might influence the recruitment pattern of inflammatory MOs and polarization features of MPs in dystrophic muscles, as well as the impact upon overall disease severity. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that in diametric opposition to the situation observed in previously healthy muscles subjected to injury, loss of CCR2 function in dystrophicmice (either genetically or pharmacologically induced) improves characteristic histopathological features of the disease and more importantly substantially increases the force-generating capacity of the diaphragm. CCR2 deficiency in mdxmice preferentially reduced the CD11bhigh population of MPs derived from recently recruited Ly6Chigh inflammatory MOs and promoted recovery of normal MP polarization characteristics. These findings represent the first direct evidence of a critical role for CCR2-driven inflammatory MO recruitment in DMD pathogenesis and additionally identify CCR2 as an important modulator of disease severity, thus indicating its potential to serve as a new therapeutic target in DMD.
Results
Upregulation of CCR2 and its ligands in dystrophic muscles
Because the diaphragm exhibits the most severe dystrophic features in mdxmice, we compared the mRNA expression levels of CCR2 and its ligands (CCL2, CCL7, CCL8, CCL12) in mdx diaphragm and limb muscle (tibialis anterior, TA). This was done at 6 weeks (Fig 1A) and 12 weeks (Fig 1B); the younger age represents the acute inflammatory stage of the disease, whereas older age group muscles have entered a less intense chronic inflammatory phase. In both age groups, mdx diaphragms demonstrated CCR2 expression levels which were significantly increased above WT values (elevated 2.4-fold at 6 weeks and 6.3-fold at 12 weeks). In the TA limb muscle, CCR2 expression was similarly upregulated at 12 weeks (5.8-fold increase over WT).
Figure 1
Upregulation of CCR2 and its chemokine ligands in dystrophic muscles
Transcript levels of CCR2 and its ligands in diaphragm (DIA) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of mdx mice. Data are expressed as fold change compared to age-matched WT controls; the dashed line represents WT expression levels for each gene (n = 9 mice per group, three independent experiments).
At 6 weeks of age, asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between WT and mdx as follows: P = 8.2e-6 (for DIA CCR2), P = 1.2e-13 (for DIA CCL2), P = 5.8e-9 (for TA CCL2), P = 2.8e-17 (for DIA CCL7), P = 5.3e-6 (for TA CCL7), P = 3.6e-7 (for DIA CCL8), P = 2.9e-5 (for TA CCL8), P = 7.7e-9 (for DIA CCL12), P = 0.001 (for TA CCL12); cross (†) indicates significant difference between DIA and TA as follows: P = 0.0003 (for CCR2), P = 8.1e-7 (for CCL2), P = 2.2e-7 (for CCL7), P = 0.008 (for CCL8), P = 2.2e-6 (for CCL12).
At 12 weeks of age, * comparison between WT and mdx as follows: P = 2.5e-6 (for DIA CCR2), P = 7.5e-6 (for TA CCR2), P = 0.0004 (for DIA CCL2), P = 0.001 (for TA CCL2), P = 0.0003 (for DIA CCL7), P = 0.0005 (for TA CCL7), P = 8e-14 (for DIA CCL8), P = 2.3e-7 (for TA CCL8), P = 3.9e-14 (for DIA CCL12), P = 0.004 (for TA CCL12); † comparison between DIA and TA as follows: P = 0.049 (for CCL2), P = 0.008 (for CCL7), P = 5.3e-9 (for CCL8), P = 0.004 (for CCL12).
Upregulation of CCR2 and its chemokine ligands in dystrophic muscles
Transcript levels of CCR2 and its ligands in diaphragm (DIA) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of mdxmice. Data are expressed as fold change compared to age-matched WT controls; the dashed line represents WT expression levels for each gene (n = 9 mice per group, three independent experiments).At 6 weeks of age, asterisk (*) indicates significant difference between WT and mdx as follows: P = 8.2e-6 (for DIA CCR2), P = 1.2e-13 (for DIA CCL2), P = 5.8e-9 (for TA CCL2), P = 2.8e-17 (for DIA CCL7), P = 5.3e-6 (for TA CCL7), P = 3.6e-7 (for DIA CCL8), P = 2.9e-5 (for TA CCL8), P = 7.7e-9 (for DIA CCL12), P = 0.001 (for TA CCL12); cross (†) indicates significant difference between DIA and TA as follows: P = 0.0003 (for CCR2), P = 8.1e-7 (for CCL2), P = 2.2e-7 (for CCL7), P = 0.008 (for CCL8), P = 2.2e-6 (for CCL12).At 12 weeks of age, * comparison between WT and mdx as follows: P = 2.5e-6 (for DIA CCR2), P = 7.5e-6 (for TA CCR2), P = 0.0004 (for DIA CCL2), P = 0.001 (for TA CCL2), P = 0.0003 (for DIA CCL7), P = 0.0005 (for TA CCL7), P = 8e-14 (for DIA CCL8), P = 2.3e-7 (for TA CCL8), P = 3.9e-14 (for DIA CCL12), P = 0.004 (for TA CCL12); † comparison between DIA and TA as follows: P = 0.049 (for CCL2), P = 0.008 (for CCL7), P = 5.3e-9 (for CCL8), P = 0.004 (for CCL12).The upregulation of CCR2 ligand expression in mdx muscles was even more prominent than of the CCR2 receptor. This was particularly striking for CCL2 and CCL7, which were greatly increased above WT at 6 weeks (23.5-fold and 37.2-fold, respectively), and even more so at 12 weeks (45.5-fold and 75.9-fold, respectively) in the mdx diaphragm. Importantly, both CCL2 and CCL7 have been shown to play critical roles in the mobilization of MOs from bone marrow to blood (Tsou et al, 2007). A similar pattern of CCR2 ligand upregulation was also observed in the mdx TA muscle, albeit at a lower level than in the diaphragm. Taken together, these data show that CCR2 and its associated chemokine ligands are greatly elevated in dystrophicmdx muscles during both the acute and the chronic inflammatory stages of the disease.
CCR2 deficiency reduces macrophage accumulation in dystrophic muscle
To evaluate the role of CCR2 and its ligands in muscular dystrophy pathogenesis, we generated CCR2-deficientmdxmice (mdx-CCR2−/−). Flow cytometry was performed on cell suspensions from the entire diaphragm muscle, and intramuscular MPs were identified on the basis of their prototypical markers CD11b and F4/80 (Fig 2A and Supplementary Fig S1). Mdxmice contained higher numbers of intramuscular MPs than WT mice, and this was particularly evident at 6 weeks of age (Fig 2B and C). The mdx-CCR2−/− mice demonstrated a group mean of 57% reduction in overall MP numbers (as well as a 40% reduction of CD45+ cells) relative to the mdx group at 6 weeks, whereas no significant difference in total MP numbers or CD45+ cells was found between these two groups at 12 weeks.
Figure 2
CCR2 deficiency reduces macrophage accumulation in dystrophic diaphragms
Representative flow cytometry plots of CD45+ cells from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups at 6 weeks (left panel) and 12 weeks (right panel), showing percentages of infiltrating MPs in the diaphragm.
Total numbers of diaphragm MPs (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+) in the three mouse strains. For 6 weeks of age (upper panel), * comparison with WT: P = 1.3e-8 (for mdx) and P = 0.006 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 2.7e-6. For 12 weeks of age (lower panel), * comparison with WT: P = 0.001 (for mdx) and P = 0.01 (for mdx-CCR2−/−).
Infiltrating MPs detected by F4/80 immunostaining (brown staining) in mdx (left panel) and mdx-CCR2−/− (right panel) mice at 6 weeks of age. Magnification 20×, scale bars represent 50 μm.
Correlation (r = 0.79, P = 5.2e-7) between mean fluorescent intensities (MFI) of Ly6C and CD11b on diaphragm MPs from combined WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.
Representative flow cytometry dot plots of MPs classified as CD11bhigh and CD11blow based on CD11b expression level.
Ratio of CD11bhigh to CD11blow MPs in the three mouse strains; data are group means ± SE (n = 7 mice per group, three independent experiments). At 6 weeks (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.034; # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.022. For 12 weeks of age (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.01 (for mdx) and P = 0.046 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0001.
CCR2 deficiency reduces macrophage accumulation in dystrophic diaphragms
Representative flow cytometry plots of CD45+ cells from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups at 6 weeks (left panel) and 12 weeks (right panel), showing percentages of infiltrating MPs in the diaphragm.Total numbers of diaphragm MPs (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+) in the three mouse strains. For 6 weeks of age (upper panel), * comparison with WT: P = 1.3e-8 (for mdx) and P = 0.006 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 2.7e-6. For 12 weeks of age (lower panel), * comparison with WT: P = 0.001 (for mdx) and P = 0.01 (for mdx-CCR2−/−).Infiltrating MPs detected by F4/80 immunostaining (brown staining) in mdx (left panel) and mdx-CCR2−/− (right panel) mice at 6 weeks of age. Magnification 20×, scale bars represent 50 μm.Correlation (r = 0.79, P = 5.2e-7) between mean fluorescent intensities (MFI) of Ly6C and CD11b on diaphragm MPs from combined WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− at 6 weeks and 12 weeks.Representative flow cytometry dot plots of MPs classified as CD11bhigh and CD11blow based on CD11b expression level.Ratio of CD11bhigh to CD11blow MPs in the three mouse strains; data are group means ± SE (n = 7 mice per group, three independent experiments). At 6 weeks (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.034; # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.022. For 12 weeks of age (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.01 (for mdx) and P = 0.046 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0001.Recent work has provided evidence for the existence of two major MP lineages in mice: a hematopoietic MO-derived lineage which is the major contributor to CD11bhigh tissue MPs and a non-hematopoietic embryonic yolk sac-derived lineage which gives rise to CD11blow resident tissue MPs (Schulz et al, 2012). We found a strong correlation between the mean fluorescent intensities of Ly6C and CD11b expression in MPs extracted from muscle (Fig 2D), consistent with the CD11bhigh MPs being derived from recently recruited Ly6Chigh inflammatory MOs. Furthermore, the great majority (over 90%) of Ly6Chigh MOs in the blood expressed CCR2 (Supplementary Fig S2). A closer analysis of intramuscular MPs within the diaphragm revealed discernible CD11bhigh and CD11blow subpopulations (Fig 2E). In mdxmice, the numbers of both CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs were increased compared to WT muscles. Most strikingly, in mdx-CCR2−/− mice, the ratio of CD11bhigh to CD11blow MPs was greatly reduced not only relative to the mdx group, but also in comparison with WT mice (Fig 2F). This was found to be true during both the acute (6 weeks) and the chronic (12 weeks) inflammatory stages of the disease. The findings are thus consistent with a scenario in which CCR2 deficiency preferentially inhibits intramuscular accumulation of the recruited, blood-derived MO/MP population.Figure3A–D show the absolute numbers of CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs present in diaphragms of the three mouse strains. In comparison with mdx, absolute numbers of CD11bhigh MPs in the mdx-CCR2−/− group were significantly reduced at both 6 weeks (6.2-fold) and 12 weeks (4.2-fold) of age. However, while CD11blow MPs were decreased at 6 weeks in the mdx-CCR2−/− group (1.8-fold), there was actually a twofold increase of CD11blow MPs in these mice at 12 weeks. Differences in MP numbers within the muscle could potentially be related to altered levels of MP recruitment, survival, or proliferation. To determine whether lack of CCR2-dependent MO/MP recruitment affects the local proliferation rate of CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs in dystrophic muscle, Ki67 staining was evaluated on these MP subpopulations (gating shown in Supplementary Fig S3). As demonstrated in Fig 3E–I, mdx-CCR2−/− mice muscles contained a significantly higher percentage of Ki67+ cells for both CD11bhigh (at 6 and 12 weeks) and CD11blow (at 12 weeks) MPs, relative to the WT and mdx groups. Therefore, despite a major reduction in recruited MPs in mdx-CCR2−/− compared to mdxmice, there is a higher level of local intramuscular MP proliferation in the former group.
Figure 3
Effects of CCR2 deficiency on macrophage proliferation in dystrophic muscles
Absolute number of CD11bhigh MPs in the diaphragm at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 6.1e-7, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 7.1e-7.
Absolute number of CD11blow MPs at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 6.6e-5 (for mdx) and P = 0.02 (for mdx-CCR2−/−), # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.01.
Absolute counts of CD11bhigh MPs in the diaphragm at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 9.1e-8, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 6.1e-7.
Absolute number of CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.0003, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.
Percentage of proliferating (Ki67+) cells among CD11bhigh MPs in the three mouse strains at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.03, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.
Percentage of Ki67+ proliferating cells in CD11blow MPs at 6 weeks.
Percentage of Ki67+ cells in CD11bhigh MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.002, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0002.
Percentage of proliferating cells in CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.02, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.
Representative histograms demonstrating Ki67+ proliferating CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks.
Data information: Data are group means ± SE (n = 5 (A–D), 6 (E, F) and 7 (G, H) mice per group; three independent experiments).
Effects of CCR2 deficiency on macrophage proliferation in dystrophic muscles
Absolute number of CD11bhigh MPs in the diaphragm at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 6.1e-7, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 7.1e-7.Absolute number of CD11blow MPs at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 6.6e-5 (for mdx) and P = 0.02 (for mdx-CCR2−/−), # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.01.Absolute counts of CD11bhigh MPs in the diaphragm at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 9.1e-8, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 6.1e-7.Absolute number of CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.0003, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.Percentage of proliferating (Ki67+) cells among CD11bhigh MPs in the three mouse strains at 6 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.03, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.Percentage of Ki67+ proliferating cells in CD11blow MPs at 6 weeks.Percentage of Ki67+ cells in CD11bhigh MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.002, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0002.Percentage of proliferating cells in CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks, * comparison to WT: P = 0.02, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02.Representative histograms demonstrating Ki67+ proliferating CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs at 12 weeks.Data information: Data are group means ± SE (n = 5 (A–D), 6 (E, F) and 7 (G, H) mice per group; three independent experiments).
CCR2 deficiency alters inflammatory monocyte compartmental distribution in dystrophic mice
Previous work has shown that inflammatory Ly6Chigh MOs which are able to infiltrate into injured tissues and convert to MPs can be mobilized into the bloodstream from both bone marrow and splenic reservoirs (Geissmann et al, 2003; Arnold et al, 2007; Nahrendorf et al, 2007; Swirski et al, 2009). To examine this question in more detail, we determined the frequency of inflammatory Ly6Chigh MO/MPs in the splenic, bone marrow, and blood compartments by flow cytometry (Fig 4 and Supplementary Fig S4). At 6 weeks of age in both mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− mice, the absolute numbers of Ly6Chigh MO/MPs within the spleen were significantly reduced compared to WT mice, suggesting that the splenic reservoir might have been called upon to supply these cells to injured dystrophic muscles. This persisted at 12 weeks in mdxmice lacking CCR2, and increased numbers of Ly6Chigh MOs in the bone marrow at this time as well as reduced MOs in the blood also indicated the possibility of impaired bone marrow exit as previously described in CCR2-deficientmice (Serbina & Pamer, 2006). Because spleen-derived MO/MPs can play a role in tissue injury or healing (Swirski et al, 2009), we next performed surgical removal of the spleen at 3 weeks of age, immediately prior to onset of the acute inflammatory phase in mdxmice. This did not significantly impact upon the level of MPs in the muscle (Fig 5A and B) or the development of dystrophic histopathology and impaired diaphragmatic strength 6 weeks later (Fig 5C–G). Accordingly, these data suggest that spleen-derived MO/MPs do not play a major role in modulating early disease evolution in this model.
Figure 4
Effects of CCR2 deficiency on inflammatory monocyte dynamics in non-muscle tissues of dystrophic mice
Representative flow cytometry plots of CD45+ cells from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups at 6 weeks, showing percentages of Ly6Chigh CD11b+ MOs within spleen, bone marrow (expressed per femur), and blood.
Total number of MOs at 6 weeks in spleen (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.03 (for mdx) and P = 0.004 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); bone marrow (middle panel); and blood (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.02.
Absolute MO counts in the three mouse strains at 12 weeks in spleen (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.0001, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.002; in bone marrow (middle panel), # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.006; and in blood (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.002, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.008.
Data information: Data are group means ± SE (n = 5 mice per group, three independent experiments).
Figure 5
Splenic monocytes do not contribute to early dystrophic pathology
Quantification of MPs as a percentage of CD45+ leukocytes in control and splenectomized groups.
Total diaphragm MP number quantification.
Percentage of centrally nucleated fibers in diaphragms of control and splenectomized animals.
Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated diaphragm fibers.
Diaphragm fiber size distribution.
Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of diaphragm muscle bundles.
Eccentric contraction-induced force drop of diaphragm muscle from the two groups. There were no significant differences between control and splenectomized groups for any of the above parameters.
Data information: Data are group means ± SE (control n = 6, splenectomy n = 7; three independent experiments).
Effects of CCR2 deficiency on inflammatory monocyte dynamics in non-muscle tissues of dystrophic mice
Representative flow cytometry plots of CD45+ cells from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups at 6 weeks, showing percentages of Ly6Chigh CD11b+ MOs within spleen, bone marrow (expressed per femur), and blood.Total number of MOs at 6 weeks in spleen (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.03 (for mdx) and P = 0.004 (for mdx-CCR2−/−); bone marrow (middle panel); and blood (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.02.Absolute MO counts in the three mouse strains at 12 weeks in spleen (upper panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.0001, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.002; in bone marrow (middle panel), # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.006; and in blood (lower panel), * comparison to WT: P = 0.002, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.008.Data information: Data are group means ± SE (n = 5 mice per group, three independent experiments).
Splenic monocytes do not contribute to early dystrophic pathology
Quantification of MPs as a percentage of CD45+ leukocytes in control and splenectomized groups.Total diaphragm MP number quantification.Percentage of centrally nucleated fibers in diaphragms of control and splenectomized animals.Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated diaphragm fibers.Diaphragm fiber size distribution.Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of diaphragm muscle bundles.Eccentric contraction-induced force drop of diaphragm muscle from the two groups. There were no significant differences between control and splenectomized groups for any of the above parameters.Data information: Data are group means ± SE (control n = 6, splenectomy n = 7; three independent experiments).
CCR2-deficient mdx mice are shifted away from exaggerated inflammatory macrophage polarization
It has been reported that Ly6Chigh inflammatory MOs released into the blood enter into injured muscles and initially undergo differentiation into phagocytic inflammatory MPs, which later switch their phenotype to an anti-inflammatory (alternative) profile that favors muscle regeneration (Arnold et al, 2007). In addition to blunting the overall accumulation of MPs within dystrophic diaphragms during the acute inflammatory phase of the disease, we posited that the balance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory MPs could also be altered by CCR2 deficiency. We assessed this aspect of MP phenotype by flow cytometry (Fig 6A and Supplementary Fig S5), using the classical MP polarization markers iNOS and CD206 (Mantovani et al, 2004).
Flow cytometry was employed to assess iNOS and CD206 expression in CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages (MPs) at 6 weeks.
Representative dot plots showing diaphragm MPs with CD206neg iNOSpos and CD206pos iNOSneg profiles in WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups.
Quantification of total numbers of CD206neg iNOSpos MPs in the diaphragm, * comparison to WT: P = 6.5e–5, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0002.
Quantification of total numbers of CD206pos iNOSneg MPs in the diaphragm.
Overlay histograms of iNOS expression in the three groups. Shaded curve represents isotype control.
iNOS median fluorescence intensity (MFI) quantification on diaphragm MPs.
Overlay histograms of CD206 expression in the three groups.
CD206 MFI quantification on diaphragm MPs, * comparison to WT: P = 0.005, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.004.
Data information: All data are group means ± SE (WT and mdx: n = 4; mdx-CCR2−/−: n = 3; two independent experiments).
Flow cytometry was employed to assess iNOS and CD206 expression in CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages (MPs) at 6 weeks.Representative dot plots showing diaphragm MPs with CD206neg iNOSpos and CD206pos iNOSneg profiles in WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− groups.Quantification of total numbers of CD206neg iNOSpos MPs in the diaphragm, * comparison to WT: P = 6.5e–5, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.0002.Quantification of total numbers of CD206pos iNOSneg MPs in the diaphragm.Overlay histograms of iNOS expression in the three groups. Shaded curve represents isotype control.iNOS median fluorescence intensity (MFI) quantification on diaphragm MPs.Overlay histograms of CD206 expression in the three groups.CD206 MFI quantification on diaphragm MPs, * comparison to WT: P = 0.005, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.004.Data information: All data are group means ± SE (WT and mdx: n = 4; mdx-CCR2−/−: n = 3; two independent experiments).In mdxmice, CD206neg iNOSpos MPs were significantly increased in number compared to WT mice (Fig 6A and B). Conversely, the percentage of CD206pos iNOSneg was decreased in mdxmice, but their absolute number (Fig 6C) remained similar to the WT group by virtue of the fact that mdx diaphragms contained a much higher total number of MPs. In the mdx-CCR2−/− group, there was a 4.3-fold reduction in the number of CD206neg iNOSpos MPs relative to the mdx group (Fig 6B), whereas the total number of CD206pos iNOSneg did not differ (Fig 6C). Because many of the cells did not clearly segregate into these two discrete populations (particularly in mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− mice), we also evaluated the mean fluorescent intensities of iNOS and CD206 expression (Fig 6D–G) in all MPs. This analysis revealed that CD206 expression in MPs was significantly reduced in mdx compared to WT, but recovered to normal values in the mdx-CCR2−/− group (Fig 6F and G). Taken together, the above findings suggest that CCR2 ablation in mdxmice significantly restores the normal intramuscular MP polarization balance.
CCR2 deficiency reduces dystrophic histopathology
Since intramuscular MP accumulation and excessive skewing (in either direction) of the MP polarization balance have been implicated in muscular dystrophy pathogenesis, we next determined whether CCR2 deficiency affected the severity of muscle disease. A hallmark of DMD is the presence of regenerated muscle fibers containing centrally located nuclei (see Fig 7A), which are almost entirely absent in WT mice and can thus be used as a semi-quantitative marker for prior necrosis-regeneration cycles in mdx muscles (Karpati et al, 1988). At 6 weeks of age, there was no difference between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− groups in the percentage of centrally nucleated regenerated fibers (Fig 7B). However, by 12 weeks of age, centrally nucleated fibers were less prevalent in mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms (Fig 7C). Furthermore, the average (mean) cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated fibers (Fig 7D and E) was larger in the mdx-CCR2−/− mice at 12 weeks, suggesting more effective reconstitution of regenerated fiber size in this group. A size distribution analysis for all fibers (Fig 7F and G) confirmed an overall shift toward larger fiber sizes in mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms as well as increased expression of the regeneration-promoting growth factor IGF-1 (Fig 7H). In addition, IgG staining and hydroxyproline assays indicated reduced necrosis (Fig 7I) and decreased collagen content (Fig 7J), respectively, in the mdx-CCR2−/− group in comparison with mdxmice at 12 weeks of age. Interestingly, bone marrow-derived MPs from mdx-CCR2−/− mice also expressed lower osteopontin and higher MMP2/9 mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig S6), which is consistent with a less fibrogenic phenotype (Vetrone et al, 2009; Onozuka et al, 2011). Similar improvements in dystrophic pathology were also found in the TA muscles of mdx-CCR2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig S7). The above findings collectively suggest that CCR2 ablation reduced cycles of necrosis while at the same time promoting more effective muscle repair with less associated fibrosis.
Figure 7
Genetic ablation of CCR2 decreases dystrophic diaphragm histopathology
A Representative images of transverse diaphragm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin at 6 weeks (left panel) and 12 weeks (right panel) in mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− mice (scale bars represent 50 μm).
B, C Percentage of fibers with central nucleation at (B) 6 weeks and (C) 12 weeks, #P = 8.7e-6.
D, E Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated fibers at (D) 6 weeks and (E) 12 weeks, #P = 0.002.
F, G Fiber size distribution in WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms at (F) 6 weeks and (G) 12 weeks, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx; †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx-CCR2−/−; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 for mdx compared to mdx-CCR2−/−.
H–J In diaphragms at 12 weeks: (H) insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 mRNA levels (dashed line represents WT level), #P = 0.004; (I) muscle necrosis quantification expressed relative to mdx, #P = 0.001; and (J) hydroxyproline content, * comparison to WT: P = 1.7e-8, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 1e-8.
Data information: Data are group means ± SE (6 weeks: WT n = 5, mdx n = 5, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 6; 12 weeks: WT n = 5, mdx n = 5, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 7; three independent experiments).
Genetic ablation of CCR2 decreases dystrophic diaphragm histopathology
A Representative images of transverse diaphragm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin at 6 weeks (left panel) and 12 weeks (right panel) in mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− mice (scale bars represent 50 μm).B, C Percentage of fibers with central nucleation at (B) 6 weeks and (C) 12 weeks, #P = 8.7e-6.D, E Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated fibers at (D) 6 weeks and (E) 12 weeks, #P = 0.002.F, G Fiber size distribution in WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms at (F) 6 weeks and (G) 12 weeks, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx; †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx-CCR2−/−; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 for mdx compared to mdx-CCR2−/−.H–J In diaphragms at 12 weeks: (H) insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 mRNA levels (dashed line represents WT level), #P = 0.004; (I) muscle necrosis quantification expressed relative to mdx, #P = 0.001; and (J) hydroxyproline content, * comparison to WT: P = 1.7e-8, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 1e-8.Data information: Data are group means ± SE (6 weeks: WT n = 5, mdx n = 5, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 6; 12 weeks: WT n = 5, mdx n = 5, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 7; three independent experiments).
Force-generating capacity is increased in CCR2-deficient mdx mice
To determine whether the above histopathological amelioration translated into functional improvements, we evaluated the force-generating capacity of the diaphragm by electrical stimulation ex vivo. As anticipated, mdx diaphragms generated less force than WT at both 6 weeks (Fig 8A) and 12 weeks (Fig 8B) of age. Importantly, the diaphragms of mdx-CCR2−/− mice showed significant improvements in maximal force-generating capacity at both ages, amounting to average increases of 43 and 47% over mdx values at 6 weeks (Fig 8C) and 12 weeks (Fig 8D), respectively. In addition, we determined the extent of the force drop resulting from the repeated imposition of eccentric contractions, a method used for evaluating the ability of dystrophic muscles to resist contraction-induced mechanical damage (Petrof et al, 1993; Dudley et al, 2006). CCR2 deficiency significantly reduced the magnitude of the contraction-induced force drop in mdx diaphragms at both 6 weeks (Fig 8E) and 12 weeks (Fig 8F). Therefore, in addition to improved muscle histology, genetic ablation of CCR2 conferred significant functional benefits upon the muscles of mdxmice.
Figure 8
CCR2 ablation improves force-generating capacity of the dystrophic diaphragm
A, B Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of diaphragms from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− mice at (A) 6 weeks and (B) 12 weeks.
C, D Quantification of maximum force-generating capacity of diaphragms at (C) 6 weeks and (D) 12 weeks.
E, F Eccentric contraction-induced force drop quantification for the diaphragm at (E) 6 weeks and (F) 12 weeks.
Data information: In panels (A–B) and (E–F): *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx; †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx-CCR2−/−; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 for mdx compared to mdx-CCR2−/−. For panel (C): * comparison between WT and mdx: P = 1.8e-5; † comparison between WT and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02; # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02. For panel (D): * comparison between WT and mdx: P = 2.1e-8; † comparison between WT and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 1.2e-5, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.01. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (6 weeks: n = 8 per group; 12 weeks: WT n = 8, mdx n = 7, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 6; three independent experiments).
CCR2 ablation improves force-generating capacity of the dystrophic diaphragm
A, B Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of diaphragms from WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− mice at (A) 6 weeks and (B) 12 weeks.C, D Quantification of maximum force-generating capacity of diaphragms at (C) 6 weeks and (D) 12 weeks.E, F Eccentric contraction-induced force drop quantification for the diaphragm at (E) 6 weeks and (F) 12 weeks.Data information: In panels (A–B) and (E–F): *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx; †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001 for WT compared to mdx-CCR2−/−; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 for mdx compared to mdx-CCR2−/−. For panel (C): * comparison between WT and mdx: P = 1.8e-5; † comparison between WT and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02; # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.02. For panel (D): * comparison between WT and mdx: P = 2.1e-8; † comparison between WT and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 1.2e-5, # comparison between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/−: P = 0.01. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (6 weeks: n = 8 per group; 12 weeks: WT n = 8, mdx n = 7, mdx-CCR2−/−
n = 6; three independent experiments).
Pharmacological blockade of CCR2 is beneficial in mdx mice
Finally, to assess the potential for pharmacologic intervention, we treated mdxmice with a CCR2-inhibiting ‘fusokine’ molecule (truncated CCL2/GM-CSF fusion protein) which was secreted systemically by retrovirally engineered mesenchymal stromal cells (Rafei et al, 2009, 2011) implanted subcutaneously into mdxmice at 3 weeks of age. High levels of the fusokine molecule were measured in the serum at 6 weeks after initiation of the treatment (Fig 9A), and there was a decrease in MP infiltration of the diaphragm (Fig 9B). At this time in the diaphragms of fusokine- versus sham-treated mdxmice, there was a trend (P = 0.098) toward reduced percentage of centrally nucleated fibers (Fig 9C), a significant increase in the size of centrally nucleated fibers (Fig 9D), a shift in overall fiber size distribution toward larger fibers (Fig 9E), and reduced fibrosis (Fig 9F). In addition, the diaphragms of fusokine-treated mdxmice exhibited improvements in maximal force-generating capacity (Fig 9G and H) and greater resistance to contraction-induced mechanical damage (Fig 9I). Therefore, pharmacological blockade of CCR2 at an early stage of the disease resulted in a significant amelioration of the dystrophic phenotype in a manner which was similar to that observed in the genetic CCR2 ablation model.
Figure 9
Pharmacological blockade with an anti-CCR2 fusokine ameliorates the dystrophic diaphragm phenotype
At 6 weeks after initiation of treatment, comparisons between fusokine (n = 7) and sham (n = 5) treated mice are shown for:
Fusokine protein (truncated CCL2) levels in serum, *P = 3.8e-9.
Diaphragm MP infiltration, *P = 0.03.
Percentage of centrally nucleated diaphragm fibers.
Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated fibers, *P = 0.0002.
Fiber size distribution, *P = 0.03 (for 1–500 μm2), P = 0.02 (for 1,001–1,500 μm2), and P = 0.02 (for 2,001–2,500 μm2).
Fibrosis quantification, *P = 0.049.
Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of the diaphragm, *P = 0.0009 (for 30 Hz), P = 2.7e-5 (for 50 Hz), P = 1.2e-5 (for 100 Hz), and P = 8.8e-6 (for 150 Hz).
Maximal force-generating capacity of the diaphragm, *P = 1.1e-5.
Force drop in the diaphragm following eccentric contractions, *P = 3.1e-5 (for contraction 1), P = 4.7e-6 (for contraction 2), P = 9.2e-5 (for contraction 3), P = 6.3e-5 (for contraction 4), and P = 2.5e-5 (for contraction 5).
Data information: Data are group means ± SE from three independent experiments.
Pharmacological blockade with an anti-CCR2 fusokine ameliorates the dystrophic diaphragm phenotype
At 6 weeks after initiation of treatment, comparisons between fusokine (n = 7) and sham (n = 5) treated mice are shown for:Fusokine protein (truncated CCL2) levels in serum, *P = 3.8e-9.Diaphragm MP infiltration, *P = 0.03.Percentage of centrally nucleated diaphragm fibers.Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated fibers, *P = 0.0002.Fiber size distribution, *P = 0.03 (for 1–500 μm2), P = 0.02 (for 1,001–1,500 μm2), and P = 0.02 (for 2,001–2,500 μm2).Fibrosis quantification, *P = 0.049.Force–frequency curves during electrical stimulation of the diaphragm, *P = 0.0009 (for 30 Hz), P = 2.7e-5 (for 50 Hz), P = 1.2e-5 (for 100 Hz), and P = 8.8e-6 (for 150 Hz).Maximal force-generating capacity of the diaphragm, *P = 1.1e-5.Force drop in the diaphragm following eccentric contractions, *P = 3.1e-5 (for contraction 1), P = 4.7e-6 (for contraction 2), P = 9.2e-5 (for contraction 3), P = 6.3e-5 (for contraction 4), and P = 2.5e-5 (for contraction 5).Data information: Data are group means ± SE from three independent experiments.
Discussion
DMD is the most common X-linked lethal disorder in humans, with an incidence of approximately 1 in 3,500 male births. Absence of the dystrophin protein leads to muscle fiber death, principally through necrosis. Because the disease involves the diaphragm and other respiratory muscles, most patients die of respiratory failure by their early 20s unless supported by mechanical ventilation. At the present time, there is very little in the way of effective therapy. Although the ideal treatment would be gene therapy to restore dystrophin expression to all muscles of the body, major biological and technical hurdles will first need to be overcome. In the meanwhile, there is an urgent need for new therapies. Corticosteroids are the only agents known to slow disease progression, but with very limited success and considerable side effects (Manzur et al, 2008).The results of this study reveal a key role for CCR2-dependent inflammatory MO/MP recruitment in promoting disease progression in dystrophin-deficient skeletal muscle. We thus show for the first time that interference with CCR2 function, through either genetic or pharmacologic means, confers substantial therapeutic benefits to mdxmice. At the tissue level, mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms exhibited improved force generation, increased fiber cross-sectional area, and reduced fibrosis. These beneficial effects upon the disease were associated with two principal effects upon MO/MP behavior. Firstly, CCR2 deficiency resulted in a major attenuation of inflammatory MO recruitment to dystrophic muscles. Secondly, MPs within the muscles of CCR2-deficient dystrophicmice exhibited a less proinflammatory phenotype. Taken together, these results suggest that CCR2-dependent chemokine signaling to MO/MPs is critically involved in driving pathological inflammation and tissue injury in DMD.In DMD muscles, the composition of the inflammatory infiltrate, that is, a predominance of MPs, is consistent with the observed upregulation of CCR2 and its ligands. CCR2 binds to several chemokine ligands including CCL2 (MCP-1), CCL8 (MCP-2), CCL7 (MCP-3), CCL13 (MCP-4), and CCL12 (MCP-5). Interestingly, the benefits of blocking CCR2 which we observed in mdxmice are in marked contrast to the situation in acutely injured healthy muscles, where intact CCR2 signaling is essential for effective muscle repair. The latter is highlighted by studies showing that ablation of either CCR2 or CCL2 results in delayed muscle regeneration and impaired muscle strength recovery (Martinez et al, 2010; Contreras-Shannon et al, 2007; Shireman et al, 2007). Although we and others have shown that myoblasts and their precursors (satellite cells) can express CCR2 and respond to CCL2 stimulation in vitro (Warren et al, 2005; Yahiaoui et al, 2008), bone marrow chimera models have indicated that CCR2 signaling in the myeloid lineage rather than myogenic cells is the main prerequisite for successful regeneration of normal muscles following acute injury (Sun et al, 2009).It is important to recognize that dystrophic muscles present an entirely different scenario, which is one of the chronic repetitive injuries with smoldering inflammation. The lack of a concerted switch toward a more anti-inflammatory MP phenotype in mdxmice is in marked contrast to what occurs in acute muscle injury models (Arnold et al, 2007; Lu et al, 2011), thus reiterating the differences between self-limited inflammation following acute injury of normal muscle and the incomplete resolution of inflammation which is characteristic of muscular dystrophy (Porter et al, 2002). In this setting, much of the tissue damage and subsequent fibrotic response of DMD skeletal muscle appears to be driven by the host inflammatory response (Messina et al, 2006; Acharyya et al, 2007; Villalta et al, 2009).In our study, the decreased prevalence of centrally nucleated (regenerated) fibers observed in CCR2-deficientmdxmice is consistent with a reduction in necrosis-regeneration cycles (Karpati et al, 1988). Furthermore, the fact that regenerated fibers were larger in mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms and the reduced level of fibrosis both suggest that mdx muscle fiber repair processes were more effective in the absence of CCR2. Anti-inflammatory MPs in skeletal muscle are known to produce muscle growth-promoting mediators such as IGF-1 (Arnold et al, 2007; Lu et al, 2011). In addition, although these ‘wound-healing’ type MPs can either favor (Vidal et al, 2008) or inhibit (Pesce et al, 2009) tissue fibrosis depending upon the specific context, our data suggest that the tissue injury induced by proinflammatory mediators released from inflammatory MPs (Villalta et al, 2009) is likely to be an important early initiator of muscle fibrosis in mdxmice. Inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species can also directly suppress force production in the absence of detectable histological injury (Whitehead et al, 2008; Bellinger et al, 2009; Piers et al, 2011), and reduced exposure to such proinflammatory mediators is another probable mechanism for improved force generation in mdx-CCR2−/− diaphragms.The cross talk between injured skeletal muscles and recruited inflammatory cells is mediated to a large extent by chemokines such as CCL2 and CCL7, which have important effects in mobilizing MOs from the bone marrow (Tsou et al, 2007). These chemokine ligands of CCR2 are substantially elevated not only within dystrophic muscles but also in the serum of mdxmice (Nelson et al, 2011). In mice, at least two distinct subsets of blood MOs are known to exist. The Ly6Clow subset exhibits low CCR2 expression and appears to mostly play a homeostatic patrolling function within the circulation (Auffray et al, 2007). On the other hand, Ly6Chigh MOs express high levels of CCR2 and are rapidly recruited to sites of acute infection or inflammation, where they give rise to inflammatory MPs (Arnold et al, 2007). Accordingly, the decrease of inflammatory profile MPs within the muscles of mdx-CCR2−/− mice can most readily be explained by two factors. First, the release of Ly6Chigh MOs from the bone marrow is reported to be significantly impeded in mice lacking CCR2 (Serbina & Pamer, 2006; Lu et al, 2011), thus accounting for reduced transit of these cells into the bloodstream. Second, for Ly6Chigh MOs that do achieve exit from the bone marrow, their ability to leave the circulation and gain entrance to injured muscles is additionally impaired by the absence of CCR2 (Serbina & Pamer, 2006; Lu et al, 2011).The mechanisms governing MP fate and polarization in skeletal muscle are only beginning to be understood (Saclier et al, 2013). In several non-muscle tissues, it was recently reported that murine MPs are derived from two major sources: a CD11bhigh hematopoietic lineage derived from blood-borne cells and a CD11blow non-hematopoietic lineage originating from the embryonic yolk sac that gives rise to the resident MP population (Schulz et al, 2012). Although this issue has not to our knowledge been specifically examined in skeletal muscle, we found a strong correlation between expression levels of Ly6C and CD11b in intramuscular MPs. This is consistent with the concept that CD11bhigh MPs are primarily derived from recently recruited Ly6Chigh inflammatory MOs. Importantly, CCR2 deficiency preferentially reduced the accumulation of these CD11bhigh MPs during both the acute and the chronic stages of inflammation in dystrophic muscles.In addition to inflammatory MO recruitment as a source of intramuscular MPs, the MP population within tissues is able to proliferate and expand itself locally (Jenkins et al, 2013; Hashimoto et al, 2013; Robbins et al, 2013; Yona et al, 2013). In the present study, we found that CCR2 deficiency increased the local proliferation of MPs in dystrophic muscles, initially in the recruited CD11bhigh population (at 6 weeks) and later in both CD11bhigh and CD11blow MPs (at 12 weeks). This suggests that a significant proportion of the accumulated MPs within mdx-CCR2−/− muscles may have originated from local proliferation and helps to explain the fact that total MP numbers did not differ between mdx and mdx-CCR2−/− mice at 12 weeks. Our observations are also consistent with a recent report that clodronate-treated rats (depleted of monocytes) and then subjected to experimental injury, also showed increased proliferation of both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory profile MPs within the affected muscles (Côté et al, 2013). Taken together, the above findings collectively suggest significant adaptive compensation via local MP proliferation for the reduced MO/MP recruitment in dystrophicmice lacking CCR2.Our findings in the dystrophicmouse model are reminiscent of murine experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), in which blockade or genetic deletion of CCR2 also reduces inflammatory MO/MP accumulation and disease severity (Izikson et al, 2000; Mildner et al, 2009). In other experimental models characterized by abnormal inflammatory skewing of MPs such as diabetes (Nio et al, 2012) and obesity (Lumeng et al, 2007), CCL2 or CCR2 deficiency has also been linked to a switch away from excessive proinflammatory MP polarization. In the EAE model, the initial activation of resident tissue MPs (microglia) is believed to be an important early trigger for the accumulation of MPs derived from inflammatory MOs (Ajami et al, 2011). Resident MPs within injured skeletal muscle have also been reported to be a major source of CCL2 (Brigitte et al, 2010) and could thus serve as a trigger for CCR2-driven MO recruitment to dystrophic muscles. In addition, although CCR2 deficiency does not affect the numbers of B or T cells within acutely injured muscles (Lu et al, 2011), we do not exclude a possible role for altered regulatory T-cell (Burzyn et al, 2013) or Th2-type T-lymphocyte responses (Traynor et al, 2000; Kim et al, 2001), which could in turn lead to the production of cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13 that promote anti-inflammatory MP polarization (Sica & Mantovani, 2012). The recruitment of blood-borne fibrocytes implicated in tissue fibrosis is also CCR2 responsive (Moore et al, 2005) and could theoretically play a role in the beneficial effects of CCR2 inhibition observed in our study.In summary, the results of this study reveal that CCR2 is an important driver of persistent inflammation and progressive muscle degeneration in dystrophin-deficient muscles. Interference with CCR2 function in this context not only reduces the absolute numbers of recruited MO/MPs within dystrophic muscles, but also mitigates the exaggerated inflammatory skewing of MPs that can provoke further tissue injury and impede muscle regeneration (Saclier et al, 2013). Pharmacological agents that inhibit CCR2 signaling are already showing promise for other diseases in both humans (Gilbert et al, 2011) and preclinical animal models (Qian et al, 2011). Although corticosteroids have potent anti-inflammatory properties and are currently the only approved pharmacological therapy for DMD, these drugs have substantial side effects and low specificity, which likely explains their poor efficacy (Manzur et al, 2008). The results of this study offer the prospect of a novel therapy for DMD with more specific and targeted anti-inflammatory actions.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All animal procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and ethics committee, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Wild-type (WT; C57BL/10ScSn/J), mdx (C57BL10ScSn-mdx/J), and CCR2−/− (B6.129S4-Ccr2tm1Ifc/J, backcrossed for nine generations to C57BL/6) mice were originally purchased from The Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Male CCR2−/− mice were crossed with homozygous mdx females to produce male mdxmice that were heterozygous for the CCR2 mutation; these animals were then bred with homozygous mdx females to create both male and female mdxmice heterozygous for the CCR2 mutation. The latter were used to generate mdxmice homozygous for the CCR2 mutation (mdx-CCR2−/−) on a mixed BL10 (75%) and BL6 (25%) background, which were used for subsequent experiments. It should be noted that previous work indicates no differences in inflammation, fibrosis or myofiber damage in mdxmice on the BL10 and BL6 backgrounds (Beastrom et al, 2011), and we also found no differences in macrophage infiltration or force generation between BL10 and BL6 mice (Supplementary Fig S8). Mice were screened for the dystrophin mutation by PCR as previously described (Amalfitano & Chamberlain, 1996). To identify CCR2-deficientmice, the PCR reaction (94°C 1 min; 65°C 1.5 min; 72°C 1.5 min; for 35 cycles) used two primer sets amplifying a portion of the wild-type CCR2 allele and the neomycin cassette (see Supplementary Table S1 for primer sequences). The animals were euthanized at either 6 or 12 weeks of age with removal of both the diaphragm and tibialis anterior (TA), the latter being a frequently studied but less severely impaired limb muscle in mdxmice.
Flow cytometry
Diaphragm infiltrating MPs were characterized and quantified in WT, mdx, and mdx-CCR2−/− animals at 6 weeks and 12 weeks of age. Diaphragm, blood, bone marrow, and spleen were harvested. Single cell suspensions were obtained from entire diaphragms (excluding the central tendon) by mincing the muscle into small pieces in ice-cold PBS. The muscle pieces were incubated in buffered 0.2% collagenase B (Roche) solution for 1 h at 37°C followed by filtering of the cell suspension through a 70-μm cell strainer. Bone marrow cells were harvested by flushing both femurs and tibiae with ice-cold PBS. Spleens were ground and passed through 70-μm cell strainers to obtain single cell suspensions. Total viable cell numbers harvested from each organ were determined by Trypan blue stain exclusion and were used to calculate the absolute counts of various cell populations. Following red cell lysis, the cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA) and pre-incubated in blocking solution (anti-CD16/CD32, BD Biosciences). The cells were then surface stained using the following fluorescently labeled antibodies for 20 min at 4°C: VF00-labeled anti-mouseCD45 (clone 30-F11, BD Biosciences), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-mouseCD11b (clone M1/70), PE-Cy7-labeled anti-mouseF4/80 (clone BM8), and Alexa Fluor 647-labeled anti-mouseLy6C or with PE-labeled anti-mouseLy6C (clone HK1.4; all from BioLegend) and APC-labeled anti-mouseCCR2 (clone # 475301, R&D Systems).To assess MP proliferation, diaphragm cells were surface stained for VF00-labeled anti-mouseCD45 (BD Biosciences), APC-Cy7-labeled anti-mouseCD11b, and PE-Cy7-labeled anti-mouseF4/80 (all from BioLegend). Cells were washed, fixed, and permeabilized using Fox-P3 buffer set (BD Pharmingen), followed by staining for intra-nuclear Ki67 (clone SolA 15, FITC-labeled, eBioscience). To characterize MP polarization phenotypes, diaphragm cells were similarly surface stained for CD45, CD11b, F4/80, Ly6C, and CD206 (clone C068C2) (all from BioLegend). Stained cells were washed, fixed in 4% PFA, permeabilized using PBS/0.3% Triton, and then stained intracellularly with FITC-labeled anti-mouseiNOS (clone 6/iNOS/NOS Type II, BD Biosciences). Cells were washed to remove excess antibodies, resuspended in FACS buffer and acquired on a BD LSR-II. For each sample, 100,000–500,000 events were recorded. Data analysis was done using FlowJo software (Treestar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).Cells were gated based on their forward and side scatter properties, followed by gating on CD45+ leukocytes. MPs in diaphragm were characterized as CD11b+F4/80+ cells and were further classified as CD11bhigh or CD11blow MPs based on the level of CD11b expression on non-permeabilized cells. To identify proliferating MPs, intra-nuclear Ki67 expression was assessed in CD11bhigh and CD11blow permeabilized MPs. For MP polarization analysis, CD11b and F4/80 were used to identify intramuscular MPs, followed by gating CD206neg iNOSpos and CD206pos iNOSneg MPs. Inflammatory MOs in bone marrow, blood, and spleen were defined as CD11b+ cells with high expression of Ly6C. Appropriate isotype controls were used to set negative population gates.
Splenectomy
Animals were assigned to the sham and splenectomized groups randomly. At 3 weeks of age, mdxmice were anesthetized by isoflurane gas anesthesia, and a laparotomy was performed under sterile conditions. The spleen was gently removed after surgical ligature of its vascular supply. For the sham-operated control group, laparotomy was performed under identical conditions but without removal of the spleen. Animals were allowed to recover from surgery and then euthanized 6 weeks later for analysis.
Real-time PCR quantification of gene expression
Total RNA was extracted from tissues or cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was treated with DNase I (Gibco, USA), purified using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Germany), and then quantified by spectrophotometric optical density measurement. The purified RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA with random primers and SuperScript II (Invitrogen, USA) reverse transcriptase. Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using 5 ng of cDNA mixed with 10 μl SYBR® Green Master Mixes (SABiosciences, USA) and 1 μl of 10 μM primer mixes. RT–PCR was carried out for 40 cycles at a melting temperature of 95°C for 15 s and an annealing temperature of 60°C for 1 min using a StepOne Plus Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, USA). MouseHPRT1 was used as an internal control. The relative quantification of gene expression was analyzed by the method, and the results are expressed as n-fold difference relative to control. Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Histological analysis
Cryostat tissue sections obtained from the mid-portion of each muscle were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Randomly selected microscopic fields from each tissue section were then photographed using a QImaging Retiga-2000R digital camera mounted on an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus). Quantitative analysis of the cross-sectional areas of individual muscle fibers (mean of 521 and 707 myofibers for diaphragm and TA, respectively) and the percentage of fibers containing central nuclei [an index of previous necrosis and subsequent regeneration (Karpati et al, 1988)] were determined using a commercial software package (Image-Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, MD). To evaluate the level of muscle infiltration by MPs, tissue sections were incubated with anti-F4/80 (Abcam) and quantified using color segregation-based image analysis (Image-Pro Plus). Fibrosis and necrosis were assessed on randomly selected transverse sections (6–7 per group) by staining with Gomori's modified trichrome (Stedman et al, 1991) and HRP-goat anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody (1:500 dilution, Promega) (Weller et al, 1990), respectively. The positively stained areas were quantified (ImageJ, Bethesda, MD) and reported to the total section area. The data were collected and analyzed in a blinded fashion.
Hydroxyproline assay
As described previously (Stedman et al, 1991), muscles were homogenized in 0.5 mol/l glacial acetic acid, dried, and hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl. The samples were then processed using chloramine-T and Ehrlich's solutions, heated, and optical densities were read at 550 nm. Sample hydroxyproline content was referenced to a standard curve and expressed per mg of wet muscle weight. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma.
Bone marrow-derived macrophage cultures
To isolate bone marrow cells, femur and tibiae were cut open at the epiphyses and the marrow flushed out using RPMI. The cells were washed with RPMI and counted using Trypan blue staining. Cells were plated onto 6-well plates at a frequency of 5 × 106 cells/well and cultured for 7 days in complete RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10% L929 conditioned medium (containing M-CSF). The adherent cells at the end of 7 days culture were used for mRNA quantification.
Evaluation of force-generating capacity
The diaphragm was removed and placed into equilibrated (95% O2–5% CO2; pH 7.38) Krebs solution. After attaching the diaphragm strip to a force transducer/length servomotor system (model 300B; dual mode; Cambridge Technology, Watertown, MA), optimal length (Lo) was determined. The force–frequency relationship was measured by sequential supramaximal stimulation for 1 s at 10, 30, 50, 100, and 150 Hz, with 2 min between each stimulation train. A similar procedure was followed for the TA, except that the muscle was studied in situ during surgical anesthesia with ketamine (130 mg/kg) and xylazine (20 mg/kg). After securing the knee and ankle to a platform base, the skin of the lower hindlimb was opened to expose the TA. The distal tendon of the TA was then attached to the force transducer/length servomotor (model 305B dual mode; Cambridge Technology). After determining Lo, the TA was stimulated directly via an electrode placed on the belly of the muscle at 20, 50, 100, and 120 Hz. All muscle force data were acquired to computer at a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz for later analysis. After allowing a 10-min recovery period from the above measurements of isometric contractile properties, the diaphragm and TA muscles were further studied to evaluate the force drop after undergoing eccentric (lengthening) contractions; the protocol has been described in detail previously (Petrof et al, 1993; Dudley et al, 2006). Muscle force was normalized to cross-sectional area to determine specific force, which is expressed in Newtons/cm2.
Pharmacological anti-CCR2 treatment
Mesenchymal stromal cells from CCL2−/− mice were retrovirally transduced to express a CCR2-inhibiting ‘fusokine’ molecule, consisting of GM-CSF and truncated CCL2 (lacking the first five amino acids), also referred to in prior publications as GMME1 (Rafei et al, 2009, 2011). At 3 weeks of age in male mdxmice, approximately 5 million cells were admixed with a matrix substrate and implanted subcutaneously to form a fusokine-secreting organoid. For the control group, an identical organoid composed of non-secreting mesenchymal stromal cells was used. Secretion of the CCR2-inhibiting fusokine by the engineered mesenchymal stromal cells was verified using a standard ELISA for detection of CCL2 (eBioscience). Animals were assigned randomly to the treatment or control groups, and the data were collected and analyzed in a blinded fashion.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as group mean values ± SE. Data were analyzed using commercial software (Minitab 17.1, Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA; SPSS v11.5, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). For each experiment, we evaluated the sample size according to an estimated standard deviation of samples based on pilot experiments and/or prior studies. Collected data were assessed for normality, and significant differences between groups were determined by t-test (if 2 groups), or by ANOVA with post hoc application of the Tukey test to adjust for multiple comparisons (if > 2 groups). Non-normally distributed data sets were first transformed using Box-Cox transformation before the statistical tests were applied. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
Authors: Carlo O Martinez; Matthew J McHale; Jason T Wells; Oscar Ochoa; Joel E Michalek; Linda M McManus; Paula K Shireman Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Richard M Jin; Sarah J Blair; Jordan Warunek; Reid R Heffner; Ira J Blader; Elizabeth A Wohlfert Journal: J Immunol Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Steven S Welc; Michelle Wehling-Henricks; Jacqueline Antoun; Tracey T Ha; Isabella Tous; James G Tidball Journal: J Immunol Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 5.422