| Literature DB >> 25312308 |
Solomon Yared1,2, Kebede Deribe3,4, Araya Gebreselassie5,6, Wessenseged Lemma7, Essayas Akililu8, Oscar D Kirstein9, Meshesha Balkew10, Alon Warburg11, Teshome Gebre-Michael12, Asrat Hailu13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL, also called ''kala-azar"), is a life threatening neglected tropical infectious disease which mainly affects the poorest of the poor. VL is prevalent in Ethiopia particularly in the northwest of the country. Understanding the risk factors of VL infection helps in its prevention and control. The aim of the present study was to identify the factors associated with VL.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25312308 PMCID: PMC4205297 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0470-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Monthly VL admitted and treated at KahsayAbera Hospital, NW Ethiopia.
Figure 2Distribution of VL cases by age and sex, amongst VL patients from KahsayAbera Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, July 2011– August 2013.
Socio demographic characteristics of participants in case–control study in the visceral leshmaniasis endemic foci of the Adebay and Hagereselam, North -West Ethiopia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.810 | |||
| Male | 77(85.6%) | 163(84.5%) | 240(84.8%) | |
| Female | 13(14.4%) | 30(15.5%) | 43(15.2%) | |
| Age in years | 0.975 | |||
| <5 | 3(3.3%) | 6(3.1%) | 9(3.2%) | |
| 5-14 | 24(26.7%) | 49(25.4%) | 73(25.8%) | |
| 15-39 | 56(62.2%) | 120(62.2%) | 176(62.2%) | |
| > = 40 | 7(7.8%) | 18(9.3%) | 25(8.8%) | |
| Relation to household head | 0.973 | |||
| Head | 22(24.4%) | 55(28.5%) | 77(27.2%) | |
| Spouse | 5(5.6%) | 13(6.7%) | 18(6.4% | |
| Female child | 7(7.8%) | 15(7.8%) | 22(7.8%) | |
| Male child | 45(50.0%) | 88(45.6%) | 133(47.0%) | |
| Distantly related | 6(6.7%) | 13(6.7%) | 19(6.7%) | |
| Others (dependent, servant) | 5(5.6%) | 9(4.7%) | 14(4.9%) | |
| Current marital status | 0.334 | |||
| Single | 61(67.8%) | 129(67.2%) | 190(67.4%) | |
| Married | 28(31.1%) | 63(32.8%) | 91(32.3%) | |
| Divorced | 1(1.1%) | 0(.0%) | 1(.4%) | |
| Family size | 0.025 | |||
| 1-2 | 9(10.0%) | 36(18.7%) | 45(15.9%) | |
| 3-5 | 29(32.2%) | 76(39.4%) | 105(37.1%) | |
| 6-8 | 39(43.3%) | 69(35.8%) | 108(38.2%) | |
| > = 9 | 13(14.4%) | 12(6.2%) | 25(8.8%) | |
| Ethnic group | 0.026 | |||
| Tigre | 83(92.2%) | 188(97.4%) | 271(95.8%) | |
| Amhara | 4(4.4%) | 5(2.6%) | 9(3.2%) | |
| Others | 3(3.3%) | 0(.0%) | 3(1.1%) | |
| Major occupation currently do earn money | 0.045 | |||
| Employed | 0(0%) | 1(.5%) | 1(.4%) | |
| Business man/women | 3(3.4%) | 6(3.1%) | 9(3.2%) | |
| Farmer | 25(28.1%) | 56(29.3%) | 81(28.9%) | |
| Housewife | 8(9.0%) | 13(6.8%) | 21(7.5%) | |
| Daily labourer | 15(16.9%) | 29(15.2%) | 44(15.7%) | |
| Student | 27(30.3%) | 73(38.2%) | 100(35.7%) | |
| Have no Job | 1(1.1%) | 9(4.7%) | 10(3.6%) | |
| Others (keeping Animal) | 10(11.2%) | 4(2.1%) | 14(5.0%) | |
| Able to read and write in any language (Yes) | 60(66.7%) | 144(74.6%) | 204(72.1%) | 0.165 |
| School grade completed | 0.001 | |||
| Grade <5 | 60(66.7%) | 89(46.1%) | 149(52.7%) | |
| Grade > =5 | 30(33.3%) | 104(53.9%) | 134(47.3%) | |
| Permanent residence | 0.676 | |||
| Rural | 17(18.9%) | 30(15.5%) | 47(16.6%) | |
| Semi-urban | 72(80.0%) | 157(81.3%) | 229(80.9%) | |
| Urban | 1(1.1%) | 5(2.6%) | 6(2.1%) | |
| Study area (villages) | 0.888 | |||
| Adebay | 69(76.7%) | 152(78.8%) | 222(78.1%) | |
| Hagereselam/Endris | 10(11.1%) | 18(9.3%) | 28(9.9%) | |
| Migrant workers | 11(12.2%) | 23(11.9%) | 34(12.0%) | |
| Own farm land (Yes) | 66(73.3%0 | 140(72.5%) | 206(72.8%) | 0.889 |
| Months sleep in the farm field | 0.000 | |||
| June-November | 55(77.5%) | 104(95.4%) | 159(88.3%) | |
| December-May | 0(.0%) | 5(4.6%) | 5(2.8%) | |
| Throughout the year | 16(22.5%) | 0(.0%) | 16(8.9%) |
Knowledge of the participants on VL and sand flies vector
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | ||
| knowledge on VL | ||
| Awareness about kala-azar | 266 | 94.0% |
| Know the signs and symptoms of kala-azar | 171 | 60.4% |
| Mode of transmission | ||
| By the bite of sand fly | 85 | 30.0% |
| By the bite of mosquitoes | 148 | 52.3% |
| Do not know | 50 | 17.7% |
| Knowledge on sand fly | ||
| Identify or recognize the vector | 30 | 10.6% |
| Know about the breeding habitat of the vector | ||
| Dirty place | 41 | 14.5% |
| Cervices in the house | 20 | 7.1% |
| Thatched roof | 2 | .7% |
| Damp and dark areas | 51 | 18.0% |
|
| 70 | 24.7% |
| Cracked black cotton soil | 21 | 7.4% |
| Sand soil | 22 | 7.8% |
| Near animal burrow | 14 | 4.9% |
| Do not know | 42 | 14.8% |
Attitude and practice of the participants on VL and sand flies vector
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| The degree of severity of kala-azar as compared to malaria, kala-azar is | ||
| Very serious | 182 | 64.3% |
| Serious | 95 | 33.6% |
| Ordinary | 6 | 2.1% |
| Kala-azar is an important problem of disease | ||
| Yes | 227 | 80.2% |
| No | 56 | 19.8% |
| Kala-azar can be controlled through community participation | ||
| Yes | 131 | 46.3% |
| No | 152 | 53.7% |
| Kala-azar can affect family income | ||
| Yes | 252 | 89.0% |
| No | 31 | 11.0% |
| Kala-azar is fatal disease if it is untreated | ||
| Yes | 280 | 98.9% |
| No | 3 | 1.1% |
|
| ||
| Drug preference for treatment VL | ||
| Specific medicine | 268 | 94.7 |
| Indigenous medicine | 4 | 1.4 |
| Do not know | 11 | 3.9 |
| Prevention measures from mosquito/sand fly bite | ||
| Use of bed net | 197 | 69.6 |
| Insecticide spraying | 24 | 8.5 |
| Repellents | 15 | 5.3 |
| Cleanliness | 45 | 15.9 |
| Do not know | 2 | .7 |
| Source of information | ||
| Health personnel | 129 | 45.6 |
| Friends and neighbours | 132 | 46.6 |
| Television | 12 | 4.2 |
| Magazines | 2 | .7 |
| Radio | 4 | 1.4 |
| School | 4 | 1.4 |
Factors associated with transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in univariate analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||||
| Family size (mean, 95% Cl)** | 5.8(5.3-6.4) | 4.8(4.4-5.1) | 1.257 | 1.110 | 1.423 | 0.000 |
| Own farm land | 66(73.3%) | 140(72.5%) | 1.038 | 0.555 | 1.943 | 0.907 |
| Able to read and write | 60(66.7%) | 144(74.6%) | 0.598 | 0.319 | 1.121 | 0.109 |
| School grade <5 | 60(66.7%) | 89(46.1%) | 3.432 | 1.760 | 6.693 | 0.000 |
|
| ||||||
| Separate kitchen | 43(47.8%) | 122(63.2%) | 0.534 | 0.320 | 0.892 | 0.016 |
| Animal barn inside compound | 45(50.0%) | 79(40.9%) | 0.622 | 0.350 | 1.106 | 0.106 |
| Damp house floor | 24(26.7%) | 15(7.8%) | 4.328 | 2.097 | 8.932 | 0.000 |
| Sleeping on bed | 74(82.2%) | 183(94.8%) | 0.287 | 0.128 | 0.642 | 0.002 |
| Thatched roof | 56(62.2%) | 113(59.5%) | 0.899 | 0.523 | 1.546 | 0.701 |
| Cracked house wall | 60 (66.7%) | 84 (44.4%) | 2.768 | 1.549 | 4.946 | 0.001 |
| Cracked black soil near house | 64(71.1%) | 60(31.1%) | 6.266 | 3.308 | 11.871 | 0.000 |
|
| ||||||
| Presence of cattle (mean, 95% Cl for mean)** | 5.9(3.4-8.3) | 1.8(1.3-2.3) | 1.114 | 1.047 | 1.185 | 0.001 |
| Dog ownership | 47(52.2%) | 48(24.9%) | 3.544 | 1.970 | 6.376 | 0.000 |
| Goats ownership | 37(41.1%) | 43(22.3%) | 2.500 | 1.407 | 4.443 | 0.002 |
| Number of goats per household (Mean,95% Cl for mean)** | 4.01(2.4-5.6) | 2.1(1.3-3) | 1.041 | 1.002 | 1.083 | 0.039 |
| Sheep ownership | 38(42.2%) | 72(37.3%) | 1.183 | 0.710 | 1.971 | 0.519 |
| Number of sheep per household (Mean,95% Cl for mean)** | 3.9(2.1-5.6) | 3.4(2.4-4.5) | 1.006 | 0.975 | 1.038 | 0.704 |
| Donkey ownership | 59(65.6%) | 98(50.8%) | 1.971 | 1.117 | 3.477 | 0.019 |
| Dumping animal dung near house | 38(42.2%) | 30(15.5%) | 4.170 | 2.215 | 7.849 | 0.000 |
| Apply insecticide to livestock | 21(23.3%) | 64(33.2%) | 0.603 | 0.339 | 1.072 | 0.085 |
|
| ||||||
| Sleeping outside the house near animal shelter | 43(47.8%) | 46(23.8%) | 3.062 | 1.725 | 5.437 | 0.000 |
| Sleeping under | 64(71.1%) | 96(49.7%) | 2.613 | 1.453 | 4.702 | 0.001 |
| Sleeping outside the house under bed net | 16(17.8%) | 118(61.1%) | 0.130 | 0.066 | 0.258 | 0.000 |
| House sprayed with insecticides | 16(17.8%) | 49(25.5%) | 0.577 | 0.290 | 1.148 | 0.117 |
| Smoking house | 50(56.2%) | 168(87.0%) | 0.093 | 0.038 | 0.225 | 0.000 |
| Period of days stayed in the farm field | ||||||
| Mean ( 95% Cl for mean)** | 91.3(61.7-120.9) | 8(5.9-10) | 1.035 | 1.009 | 1.062 | 0.008 |
| Sleeping in the farm field over night | 66(76.7%) | 109(56.5%) | 4.159 | 1.745 | 9.913 | 0.001 |
Odd ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (Cl), and P values derived from univariate conditional logistic regression models. **refers to calculated means.
Factors associated with VL in a ‘multivariate conditional logistic regression model among the community in Northwest Ethiopia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Family size (mean 95% Cl) | 5.8(5.3-6.4) | 4.8(4.4-5.1) | 1.359(1.026-1.799) | 0.032 |
| Sleeping on bed | 74(82.2%) | 183(94.8%) | 0.158(0.028-0.898) | 0.037 |
| Ref. ground | 16(17.8%) | 10(5.2%) | 1 | |
| Cracked house wall (Yes) | 60 (66.7%) | 84 (44.4%) | 6.368(1.585-25.580) | 0.009 |
| Ref. (un-cracked) | 30(33.3%) | 105(55.6%) | 1 | |
| Own goats (Yes) | 37(41.1%) | 43(22.3%) | 6.445(1.463-28.384) | 0.014 |
| Ref. (No) | 53(58.9%) | 150(77.7%) | 1 | |
| Sleeping outside the house under bed net | 16(17.8%) | 118(61.1%) | 0.093(0.024-0.357) | 0.001 |
| Ref. (without bed net) | 74(82.2%) | 75(38.9%) | 1 | |
| Smoking house (Yes) | 50(56.2%) | 168(87.0%) | 0.082(0.011-0.630) | 0.016 |
| Ref. (No) | 39(43.8%) | 25(13.0%) | 1 | |
| Number of days stayed in the farm field (mean 95% CL) | 91.3(61.7-120.9) | 8(5.9-10) | 1.100(1.015-1.192) | 0.020 |
Odd ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (Cl), and P values derived from multivariable conditional logistic regression models.