| Literature DB >> 25311914 |
Tadatoshi Ohtaki1, Yasuna Koga, Mamiko Ono, Gen Watanabe, Kazuyoshi Taya, Shigehisa Tsumagari.
Abstract
Reproductive parameters were evaluated in 19 and 14 estrous beagles that received 100 µg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and saline treatment, respectively, on the day of luteinizing hormone (LH) surge (Day 0; estimated by serial progesterone assay) and balloon catheter-aided single transvaginal artificial insemination of frozen semen on Day 5. Although the conception rate and litter size were similar between the GnRH and saline groups, the concentration of LH peak was significantly higher in GnRH-treated bitches (P<0.01). In addition, the actual LH surge did not occur on the estimated Day 0 in one saline-treated bitch. In clinical practice that daily progesterone assay is difficult, administration of GnRH on estimated Day 0 would be recommended to induce or enhance the LH surge for timely and successful insemination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25311914 PMCID: PMC4349550 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Comparison of hormone levels and reproductive performances between 19 GnRH- and 14 saline-treated bitches in Foley catheter-assisted transvaginal artificial insemination of frozen semen
| GnRH treatment | Saline treatment | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitches | Progressive | P4 concentrations | Concentrations of LH peak | Number of | Bitches | Progressive | P4 concentrations | Concentrations of LH peak | Number of | ||
| Day 0 | Day 5 | Day 0 | Day 5 | ||||||||
| 1 | 50 | 2.73 | 22.00 | 61.67 | 7 | A | 50 | 2.94 | 22.00 | 11.64 | 3 |
| 2 | 60 | 2.51 | 24.09 | 24.72 | 5 | B | 55 | 2.51 | 24.09 | 5.72 | 9 |
| 3 | 55 | 4.24 | 40.16 | 26.28 | 7 | C | 50 | 4.24 | 40.16 | 29.46 | 7 |
| 4 | 50 | 2.00 | 30.35 | 26.46 | 6 | D | 50 | 2.00 | 30.35 | 6.83 | 4 |
| 5 | 55 | 3.57 | 37.29 | 28.60 | 1 | E | 50 | 3.57 | 37.29 | 5.57 | 3 |
| 6 | 60 | 5.53 | 42.57 | 22.16 | 7 | F | 55 | 5.53 | 42.57 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 7 | 50 | 3.34 | 42.39 | 27.41 | 5 | G | 65 | 3.34 | 42.39 | 0.90 | Non-con-ception |
| 8 | 60 | 4.66 | 45.37 | 37.30 | 6 | H | 60 | 4.66 | 45.37 | 26.04 | 7 |
| 9 | 60 | 3.41 | 37.26 | 23.64 | 7 | I | 60 | 3.41 | 37.26 | 14.64 | Non-con-ception |
| 10 | 50 | 3.55 | 51.04 | 23.74 | 7 | J | 50 | 3.55 | 51.04 | 5.83 | 8 |
| 11 | 50 | 3.75 | 46.78 | 19.42 | Non-conception | K | 60 | 3.75 | 46.78 | 3.07 | 2 |
| 12 | 60 | 3.63 | 6.69 | 29.41 | 1 | L | 50 | 3.63 | 6.69 | 4.98 | 4 |
| 13 | 40 | 2.92 | 17.62 | 21.74 | 7 | M | 50 | 2.92 | 17.62 | 5.76 | 4 |
| 14 | 60 | 3.06 | 27.08 | 24.15 | Non-conception | N | 60 | 3.06 | 27.08 | 1.53 | 7 |
| 15 | 40 | 3.09 | 18.76 | 24.37 | 3 | ||||||
| 16 | 60 | 4.49 | 14.74 | 27.79 | 8 | ||||||
| 17 | 55 | 2.77 | 18.21 | 22.80 | 4 | ||||||
| 18 | 70 | 3.54 | 36.66 | 21.80 | 8 | ||||||
| 19 | 60 | 2.20 | 12.78 | 22.89 | 3 | ||||||
| Mean ± SEM | 55.0 ± 1.8 | 3.06 ± 0.12 | 30.10 ± 3.02 | 27.18 ± 9.22* | 5.4 ± 0.6 | Mean ± SEM | 54.6 ± 1.5 | 2.72 ± 0.13 | 29.78 ± 2.68 | 8.88 ± 8.82 | 5.3 ± 0.7 |
P<0.01, in comparison with the Saline treatment.
Fig. 1.Changes of P4 concentration before and after estimated LH surge in GnRH- and saline-treated bitches. GnRH conception (—●—, n=17), Saline conception (...○..., n=17), GnRH non-conception (■or♦): solid line, Saline non-conception (□or◊): dashed line, Conception represents mean ± SEM.
Fig. 2.Changes of LH concentration before and after GnRH- and saline-treated bitches. GnRH conception (—●—, n=17), Saline conception (...○..., n=17), GnRH non-conception (■or♦): solid line, Saline non-conception (□or◊): dashed line, Conception represents mean ± SEM.