Literature DB >> 25311642

The consequences of co-infections for parasite transmission in the mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Alison B Duncan1, Philip Agnew1, Valérie Noel1, Yannis Michalakis1.   

Abstract

Co-infections may modify parasite transmission opportunities directly as a consequence of interactions in the within-host environment, but also indirectly through changes in host life history. Furthermore, host and parasite traits are sensitive to the abiotic environment with variable consequences for parasite transmission in co-infections. We investigate how co-infection of the mosquito Aedes aegypti with two microsporidian parasites (Vavraia culicis and Edhazardia aedis) at two levels of larval food availability affects parasite transmission directly, and indirectly through effects on host traits. In a laboratory infection experiment, we compared how co-infection, at low and high larval food availability, affected the probability of infection, within-host growth and the transmission potential of each parasite, compared to single infections. Horizontal transmission was deemed possible for both parasites when infected hosts died harbouring horizontally transmitting spores. Vertical transmission was judged possible for E. aedis when infected females emerged as adults. We also compared the total input number of spores used to seed infections with output number, in single and co-infections for each parasite. The effects of co-infection on parasite fitness were complex, especially for V. culicis. In low larval food conditions, co-infection increased the chances of mosquitoes dying as larvae or pupae, thus increasing opportunities for V. culicis' horizontal transmission. However, co-infection reduced larval longevity and hence time available for V. culicis spore production. Overall, there was a negative net effect of co-infection on V. culicis, whereby the number of spores produced was less than the number used to seed infection. Co-infections also negatively affected horizontal transmission of the more virulent parasite, E. aedis, through reduced longevity of pre-adult hosts. However, its potential transmission suffered less relative to V. culicis. Our results show that co-infection can negatively affect parasite transmission opportunities, both directly as well as indirectly via effects on host life history. We also find that transmission is contingent on the combined effect of the abiotic environment.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; Edhazardia aedis; Vavraia culicis; co‐infection; horizontal transmission; vertical transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311642     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Interactions among bacterial strains and fluke genotypes shape virulence of co-infection.

Authors:  Katja-Riikka Louhi; Lotta-Riina Sundberg; Jukka Jokela; Anssi Karvonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Pathogen communities of songbird-derived ticks in Europe's low countries.

Authors:  Dieter Heylen; Manoj Fonville; Arieke Docters van Leeuwen; Arjan Stroo; Martin Duisterwinkel; Sip van Wieren; Maria Diuk-Wasser; Arnout de Bruin; Hein Sprong
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  The evolution of transmission mode.

Authors:  Janis Antonovics; Anthony J Wilson; Mark R Forbes; Heidi C Hauffe; Eva R Kallio; Helen C Leggett; Ben Longdon; Beth Okamura; Steven M Sait; Joanne P Webster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sequential infection can decrease virulence in a fish-bacterium-fluke interaction: Implications for aquaculture disease management.

Authors:  Anssi Karvonen; Andy Fenton; Lotta-Riina Sundberg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Sequential co-infections drive parasite competition and the outcome of infection.

Authors:  Giacomo Zilio; Jacob C Koella
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Resource limitation has a limited impact on the outcome of virus-fungus co-infection in an insect host.

Authors:  Pauline S Deschodt; Jenny S Cory
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Mapping the virome in wild-caught Aedes aegypti from Cairns and Bangkok.

Authors:  Martha Zakrzewski; Gordana Rašić; Jonathan Darbro; Lutz Krause; Yee S Poo; Igor Filipović; Rhys Parry; Sassan Asgari; Greg Devine; Andreas Suhrbier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.