L Sosdian1, F Dobson2, T V Wrigley3, K Paterson4, K Bennell5, M Dowsey6, P Choong7, K Allison8, R S Hinman9. 1. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: lsosdian@student.unimelb.edu.au. 2. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: fdobson@unimelb.edu.au. 3. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: timw@unimelb.edu.au. 4. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: kade.paterson@unimelb.edu.au. 5. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: k.bennell@unimelb.edu.au. 6. The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: michelle.svhm@optusnet.com.au. 7. The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: sarcoma@bigpond.net.au. 8. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: kallison1@student.unimelb.edu.au. 9. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia. Electronic address: ranash@unimelb.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knee arthroplasty (KA) is recognized as an effective treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis and up to 90% of patients experience substantial pain relief. There has been no systematic review synthesizing the longitudinal changes in gait following KA. The aims of this systematic review were to determine the effects of KA on (i) frontal plane and (ii) sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters during the stance phase of gait. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, SPORTdiscus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched until April 10th, 2014. 1,765 articles were identified, of which 19 studies describing 3-dimensional gait analysis pre- and post-KA were included. Study quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently using the Downs and Black checklist. FINDINGS: Following KA, in the frontal plane, the maximum knee adduction angle and external knee adduction moment (KAM) tended to decrease. In the sagittal plane, findings suggest that the maximum knee flexion moment is increased. From the ten studies that included a healthy reference group, it was unclear whether gait variables returned to normal following KA. INTERPRETATION: Overall, it appears that KA results in a decreased peak KAM and maximum knee adduction angles, an increased peak knee flexion moment and inconsistent changes in the peak knee flexion angle. Knowledge gaps remain due to methodological inconsistencies across studies, limited statistical analysis, and largely heterogeneous sample populations. More research is needed to determine whether KA restores gait patterns to normal, or if additional rehabilitation may be needed to optimize gait following surgery for osteoarthritis.
BACKGROUND:Knee arthroplasty (KA) is recognized as an effective treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis and up to 90% of patients experience substantial pain relief. There has been no systematic review synthesizing the longitudinal changes in gait following KA. The aims of this systematic review were to determine the effects of KA on (i) frontal plane and (ii) sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters during the stance phase of gait. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, SPORTdiscus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched until April 10th, 2014. 1,765 articles were identified, of which 19 studies describing 3-dimensional gait analysis pre- and post-KA were included. Study quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently using the Downs and Black checklist. FINDINGS: Following KA, in the frontal plane, the maximum knee adduction angle and external knee adduction moment (KAM) tended to decrease. In the sagittal plane, findings suggest that the maximum knee flexion moment is increased. From the ten studies that included a healthy reference group, it was unclear whether gait variables returned to normal following KA. INTERPRETATION: Overall, it appears that KA results in a decreased peak KAM and maximum knee adduction angles, an increased peak knee flexion moment and inconsistent changes in the peak knee flexion angle. Knowledge gaps remain due to methodological inconsistencies across studies, limited statistical analysis, and largely heterogeneous sample populations. More research is needed to determine whether KA restores gait patterns to normal, or if additional rehabilitation may be needed to optimize gait following surgery for osteoarthritis.