| Literature DB >> 25311271 |
Marta Stelmach-Mardas1, Marcin Mardas2, Wojciech Warchoł3, Małgorzata Jamka1, Jarosław Walkowiak4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of individualized dietary counseling in obese subjects based on narrative interview technique on the maintenance of body weight reduction, changes in dietary behaviors, including type of cooking and physical activity. One-hundred subjects out of four-hundred patients met the inclusion criteria. Individually, 45-minute educational program with motivation counseling was performed in 0, 6 and 12 weeks of the study. Patients were advised to follow individually well-balanced diet for 12 weeks. The individuals were asked about the changes in their dietary habits (Food Frequency Questionnaire). The mean percentage of body weight changes from the baseline were as follows: in 6th week- 5.9%, in 12th week - 10.9% and in 52th week - 9.7% (P < 0.0001), however there were no statistically significant changes while comparing body weight in 12th and 52th week. The maintenance of body weight reduction was connected with the dietary habits changes, mainly the type of cooking and increased consumption of vegetable oils. In conclusion, individualized dietary counseling, based on narrative interview technique is an effective intervention for obesity treatment that may help maintain body weight reduction and adapt the pro-healthy changes in type of cooking and sources of dietary fat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25311271 PMCID: PMC4340361 DOI: 10.1038/srep06620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The characteristics of analyzed population (n = 100)
| Group | All | Female | Male | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzed parameter | Median | Q1–Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | ||
| Age [y] | A | 38.0 | 32.2–52.7 | 38.0 | 31.2–52.2 | 41.5 | 34.0–52.7 | ns |
| B | 38.4 | 32.1–54.3 | 37.8 | 30.9–50.7 | 43.4 | 35.2–54.5 | ||
| Weight [kg] | A | 95.0 | 82.1–106.2 | 88.0 | 81.1–100.0 | 116.2 | 99.4–135.9 | ns |
| B | 96.4 | 83.4–106.9 | 88.8 | 80.6–103.4 | 118.1 | 98.3–140.2 | ||
| Height [cm] | A | 166.0 | 161.1–172.0 | 163.5 | 159.0–167.0 | 176.0 | 171.1–181.8 | ns |
| B | 165.5 | 160.8–172.2 | 162.7 | 158.4–166.6 | 176.8 | 172.1–182.1 | ||
| Ethnicity [%] | ||||||||
| Caucasian | A | 100 | 100 | 100 | ns | |||
| B | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||
| Education [%] | ||||||||
| University degree | A | 7.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | ||||
| B | 31.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | |||||
| High school | A | 35.0 | 31.0 | 45.0 | <0.001 | |||
| B | 31.0 | 40.0 | 17.0 | |||||
| Primary school | A | 58.0 | 63.0 | 45.0 | ||||
| B | 38.0 | 40.0 | 33.0 | |||||
| Marital status [%] | ||||||||
| Never married | A | 31.0 | 36.0 | 15.0 | ||||
| B | 19.0 | 20.0 | 16.5 | |||||
| Married | A | 67.0 | 63.0 | 80.0 | ||||
| B | 69.0 | 70.0 | 67.0 | <0.05 | ||||
| Divorced | A | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | ||||
| B | 6.0 | 0.0 | 16.5 | |||||
| Widowed | A | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| B | 6.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | |||||
Q1, quartile 1; Q3, quartile 3; A, studied group (All: n = 84, female: n = 64; male: n = 20); B, control group (All: n = 16, female: n = 10, male: n = 6); ns, not significant.
Figure 1The percentage changes in body mass among studied individuals.
*Friedman test showing summarized effect for the all time points; comparisons between each time points showed Dunn's Multiple Comparison test: 0 wk vs 6 wk P < 0.05; 0 wk vs 12 wk P < 0.05; 0 wk vs 52 wk P < 0.05; 6 wk vs 12 wk P < 0.05; 6 wk vs 52 wk P < 0.05; 12 wk vs 52 wk P > 0.05.
The changes in body mass and Body Mass Index during dietary modification among analyzed individuals (n = 100)
| Group | Weight [kg] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 6-week | 12-week | 52-week | p | |||||
| Median | Q1–Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | ||
| Studied group (n = 84) | 95.0 | 82.1–106.2 | 88.9 | 77.1–99.5 | 84.0 | 72.0–94.9 | 88.0 | 73.5–97.0 | <0.0001 |
| Female (n = 64) | 88.0 | 81.1–100.0 | 82.5 | 75.6–94.0 | 77.9 | 71.0–90.0 | 78.0 | 72.0–91.0 | <0.0001 |
| Male (n = 20) | 116.2 | 99.4–135.9 | 109.5 | 92.8–127.0 | 102.6 | 88.2–122.6 | 104.4 | 93.0–115.0 | <0.0001 |
| Control group (n = 16) | 96.4 | 83.4–106.9 | - | - | - | - | 96.7 | 83.7–107 | ns |
| Female (n = 10) | 88.8 | 80.6–103.4 | - | - | - | - | 88.9 | 80.4–103.7 | ns |
| Male (n = 6) | 118.1 | 98.3–140.2 | - | - | - | - | 118.4 | 98.4–140.5 | ns |
Q1, quartile 1; Q3, quartile 3; BMI, Body Mass Index; ns, not significant.
*Friedman test showing summarized effect for the all time points; comparisons between each time points showed Dunn's Multiple Comparison test: 0 wk vs 6 wk P < 0.05; 0 wk vs 12 wk P < 0.05; 0 wk vs 52 wk P < 0.05; 6 wk vs 12 wk P < 0.05; 6 wk vs 52 wk P < 0.05; 12 wk vs 52 wk P > 0.05.
Percentage changes of food frequency intake in relation to weight loss after 52-week follow up
| % changes in eating behavior | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >10% weight loss (n = 39) | <10% weight loss (n = 45) | ||||||
| Product | less | Unchanged | more | less | unchanged | more | p |
| Wholemeal bread | 7.7 | 0.0 | 92.3 | 4,4 | 0.0 | 95.6 | ns |
| White bread | 94.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 84.4 | 11.2 | 4.4 | ns |
| Milk and dairy products | 20.5 | 56.4 | 23.1 | 26.7 | 48.9 | 24.4 | ns |
| Cheeses | 87.2 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 73.3 | 11.1 | 15.6 | <0.05 |
| Vegetable | 7.6 | 82.1 | 10.3 | 4.4 | 84.4 | 11.2 | ns |
| Fruit | 10.3 | 79.4 | 10.3 | 15.6 | 64.4 | 20.0 | <0.05 |
| Pork | 41.0 | 5.2 | 53.8 | 28.9 | 6.7 | 64.4 | ns |
| Poultry | 2.6 | 25.6 | 71.8 | 4.4 | 24.4 | 71.2 | ns |
| Eggs | 5.1 | 94.9 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 80.0 | 8.9 | <0.01 |
| Fish | 15.4 | 56.4 | 28.2 | 8.9 | 60.0 | 31.1 | ns |
| Organ meats | 94.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 93.4 | 2.2 | 4.4 | ns |
| Margarine | 15.3 | 46.2 | 38.5 | 17.8 | 26.6 | 55.6 | <0.05 |
| Butter | 82.1 | 17.9 | 0.0 | 77.8 | 17.8 | 4.4 | ns |
| Vegetable oils | 2.6 | 30.7 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 37.8 | 62.2 | ns |
| Sweets | 28.2 | 0.0 | 71.8 | 13.3 | 0.0 | 86.7 | <0.01 |
| Snacks | 79.6 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 57.8 | 17.8 | 24.4 | <0.001 |
| Fast food | 71.8 | 28.2 | 0.0 | 53.3 | 37.8 | 8.9 | <0.05 |
| Tea | 5.1 | 35.9 | 59.0 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | ns |
| Coffee | 5.1 | 59.0 | 35.9 | 8.9 | 53.3 | 37.8 | ns |
| Juice | 84.6 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 66.7 | 6.6 | 26.7 | <0.01 |
| Water | 0.0 | 5.1 | 94.9 | 4.4 | 15.6 | 80.0 | <0.01 |
| Boiling and steaming | 2.6 | 5.1 | 92.3 | 17.8 | 11.1 | 71.1 | <0.001 |
| Frying, roasting, grilling | 71.8 | 0.0 | 28.2 | 60.0 | 4.4 | 35.6 | <0.05 |
| Alcohol | 46.2 | 41.0 | 12.8 | 44.4 | 31.2 | 24.4 | ns |
| Physical activity | 61.5 | 20.5 | 18.0 | 64.4 | 15.6 | 20.0 | ns |
ns, not significant.
Figure 2Predictors influencing body weight maintenance after 52-week follow up.
*P < 0.05.
Figure 3The study flow diagram.