Daniel Schwarzkopf1, Isabella Westermann2, Helga Skupin3, Niels C Riedemann4, Konrad Reinhart5, Ruediger Pfeifer6, Michael Fritzenwanger7, Albrecht Günther8, Otto W Witte9, Christiane S Hartog10. 1. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Daniel.Schwarzkopf@med.uni-jena.de. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Isabella.Westermann@med.uni-jena.de. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Helga.Skupin@med.uni-jena.de. 4. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Niels.Riedemann@med.uni-jena.de. 5. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Konrad.Reinhart@med.uni-jena.de. 6. Department of Internal Medicine I, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Ruediger.Pfeifer@med.uni-jena.de. 7. Department of Internal Medicine I, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Michael.Fritzenwanger@med.uni-jena.de. 8. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Department of Neurology, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Albrecht.Guenther@med.uni-jena.de. 9. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Department of Neurology, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Otto.Witte@med.uni-jena.de. 10. Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital (JUH), Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, JUH, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany. Electronic address: Christiane.Hartog@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to create a questionnaire that measures barriers and facilitators of effective end-of-life (EOL) decision making and communication and associated stress as perceived by intensive care unit (ICU) staff. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed on the basis of a theoretical framework and discussion with ICU staff. It was pretested among 15 ICU nurses and physicians. A field test was conducted in 4 interdisciplinary ICUs of one university hospital Descriptive item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability and validity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 174 of 284 ICU staff participated in the field test (61% response). Factor analysis indicated a 7-factor solution: (1) collaboration in the EOL context, (2) role clarity in the EOL context, (3) work-related interruptions of communication with families, (4) emotional support, (5) stress by involvement in EOL decision making and communication with families, (6) stress by work overload, and (7) taking initiative toward EOL decision making. Internal consistency of the scales was acceptable (range, 0.69-0.85). Construct validity was shown by relationships of the scales to several constructs, for example, satisfaction with EOL decision making and emotional exhaustion. Overall, 26 of 31 expected relationships achieved significance. CONCLUSIONS: The new questionnaire meets psychometric criteria of reliability and validity and promises to be a useful quality measure of EOL decision making in the ICU.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to create a questionnaire that measures barriers and facilitators of effective end-of-life (EOL) decision making and communication and associated stress as perceived by intensive care unit (ICU) staff. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed on the basis of a theoretical framework and discussion with ICU staff. It was pretested among 15 ICU nurses and physicians. A field test was conducted in 4 interdisciplinary ICUs of one university hospital Descriptive item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability and validity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 174 of 284 ICU staff participated in the field test (61% response). Factor analysis indicated a 7-factor solution: (1) collaboration in the EOL context, (2) role clarity in the EOL context, (3) work-related interruptions of communication with families, (4) emotional support, (5) stress by involvement in EOL decision making and communication with families, (6) stress by work overload, and (7) taking initiative toward EOL decision making. Internal consistency of the scales was acceptable (range, 0.69-0.85). Construct validity was shown by relationships of the scales to several constructs, for example, satisfaction with EOL decision making and emotional exhaustion. Overall, 26 of 31 expected relationships achieved significance. CONCLUSIONS: The new questionnaire meets psychometric criteria of reliability and validity and promises to be a useful quality measure of EOL decision making in the ICU.
Authors: Christiane S Hartog; F Hoffmann; A Mikolajetz; S Schröder; A Michalsen; K Dey; R Riessen; U Jaschinski; M Weiss; M Ragaller; S Bercker; J Briegel; C Spies; D Schwarzkopf Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 1.041