Literature DB >> 25311050

Use of the Delphi technique to determine safety features to be included in a neonatal and paediatric prescription chart.

A Cassar Flores1, S Marshall, M Cordina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal and paediatric patients are especially vulnerable to serious injury as a result of medication errors due to their small size, physiological immaturity and limited compensatory abilities. The prescription chart remains an essential form of communication of prescribing decisions and instructions. Modifications to the safety features of prescription charts have been shown to reduce the frequency of medication errors.
OBJECTIVE: To determine, using the Delphi technique, which safety features should be included in the inpatient neonatal and paediatric prescription chart to help minimise the risk of medication errors associated with the use of the chart.
SETTING: Acute general hospital in Malta.
METHOD: A two-round modified e-Delphi process was conducted. The Delphi questionnaire was developed from a mapping process, a literature search and references supporting the literature review. It comprised 155 safety features for consensus. The Delphi panel consisted of nine doctors, five nurses and four pharmacists. Participants were asked to rate their agreement to the inclusion of these features in the local chart using a three-point Likert scale, and to add further comments as necessary at the end of each section. In the second round, participants were given the opportunity to change their individual response in view of the groups' response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: This was set at a 70% level of agreement.
RESULTS: Results from each round were analysed to provide the percentage frequencies and number of participants who chose each point from the Likert scale provided, and the response count for each safety feature. A ≥70% consensus level was achieved on: 115 safety features in Round 1 (total: 155 safety features) and 23 safety features in Round 2 (total: 40 safety features) while only 17 safety features did not achieve consensus at the end of the process.
CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved on 133 safety features to be included in the neonatal and paediatric prescription chart. Five safety features achieved consensus disagreement for their inclusion in the chart. Identifying the appropriate safety features forms part of an essential strategy to reduce the incidence of medication errors associated with the use of the chart in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311050     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-014-0014-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  28 in total

1.  A national in-patient prescription chart: the experience in Wales 2004-2012.

Authors:  Philip A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The national inpatient medication chart: critical audit of design and performance at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  J Alasdair Millar; Robyn C Silla; Glenda E Lee; Ann Berwick
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Are verbal orders a threat to patient safety?

Authors:  D S Wakefield; B J Wakefield
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-06

4.  Electronic prescriptions are slowly spreading in the European Union.

Authors:  Mia Mäkinen; Päivi Rautava; Jari Forsström; Markku Aärimaa
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Medication errors: prescribing faults and prescription errors.

Authors:  Giampaolo P Velo; Pietro Minuz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Medication errors in pediatric inpatients: prevalence and results of a prevention program.

Authors:  Paula Otero; Andrea Leyton; Gonzalo Mariani; José María Ceriani Cernadas
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prevention of medication errors in the pediatric inpatient setting.

Authors:  Erin R Stucky
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals.

Authors:  H L Folli; R L Poole; W E Benitz; J C Russo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems.

Authors:  David C Radley; Melanie R Wasserman; Lauren Ew Olsho; Sarah J Shoemaker; Mark D Spranca; Bethany Bradshaw
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Holey; Jennifer L Feeley; John Dixon; Vicki J Whittaker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Construction and validation of an instrument for the structural assessment of wards for urinary continence in older adults.

Authors:  Roberta Pereira Góes; Larissa Chaves Pedreira; Camila Oliveira Valente; Fernanda Carneiro Mussi; Monaliza Lemos de Souza; Juliana Bezerra do Amaral
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-10-19

2.  An assessment for health education and health promotion in chronic disease demonstration districts: a comparative study from Hunan Province, China.

Authors:  Qiaohua Xu; Biyun Chen; Donghui Jin; Li Yin; Yuelong Huang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing electronic health records with embedded clinical decision support systems in Palestinian hospitals: a consensus study.

Authors:  Ramzi Shawahna
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Development of the Practice of Pharmaceutical Care for Cancer Pain Management in Outpatient Clinics Using the Delphi Method.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Xia-Yang Ren; Hang-Xing Huang; Ya-Min Huang; Ling Huang; Xiao-Ping Chen; Yao Chen; Chen Wang; Jian Xiao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 5.  How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Michelle King; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-02-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.