Robert S Nocon1, Yue Gao, Kathryn E Gunter, Janel Jin, Lawrence P Casalino, Michael T Quinn, Sarah Derrett, Wm Thomas Summerfelt, Elbert S Huang, Sang Mee Lee, Marshall H Chin. 1. *Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL †Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD ‡Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY §School of Health and Social Services, College of Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand ∥Advocate Healthcare, Park Ridge ¶Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated whether the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) supports patient activation and none have evaluated whether support for patient activation differs among racial and ethnic groups or by health status. This is critical because activation is lower on average among minority patients and those in poorer health. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between clinic PCMH characteristics and patient perception of clinic support for patient activation, and whether that association varies by patients' self-reported race/ethnicity or health status. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 214 providers/staff and 735 patients in 24 safety net clinics across 5 states. MEASURES: Provider/staff surveys produced a 0-100 score for PCMH characteristics. Patient surveys used the patient activation subscale of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care to produce a 0-100 score for patient perception of clinic support for patient activation. RESULTS: Across all patients, we did not find a statistically significant association between PCMH score and clinic support for patient activation. However, among the subgroup of minority patients in fair or poor health, a 10-point higher PCMH score was associated with a 14.5-point (CI, 4.4, 24.5) higher activation score. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of safety net patients, higher-rated PCMH characteristics were not associated with patients' perception of clinic support for activation among the full study population; however, we found a strong association between PCMH characteristics and clinic support for activation among minority patients in poor/fair health status. The PCMH may be promising for reducing disparities in patient activation for ill minority patients.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated whether the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) supports patient activation and none have evaluated whether support for patient activation differs among racial and ethnic groups or by health status. This is critical because activation is lower on average among minority patients and those in poorer health. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between clinic PCMH characteristics and patient perception of clinic support for patient activation, and whether that association varies by patients' self-reported race/ethnicity or health status. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 214 providers/staff and 735 patients in 24 safety net clinics across 5 states. MEASURES: Provider/staff surveys produced a 0-100 score for PCMH characteristics. Patient surveys used the patient activation subscale of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care to produce a 0-100 score for patient perception of clinic support for patient activation. RESULTS: Across all patients, we did not find a statistically significant association between PCMH score and clinic support for patient activation. However, among the subgroup of minority patients in fair or poor health, a 10-point higher PCMH score was associated with a 14.5-point (CI, 4.4, 24.5) higher activation score. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of safety net patients, higher-rated PCMH characteristics were not associated with patients' perception of clinic support for activation among the full study population; however, we found a strong association between PCMH characteristics and clinic support for activation among minority patients in poor/fair health status. The PCMH may be promising for reducing disparities in patient activation for ill minority patients.
Authors: Carlos Roberto Jaén; Robert L Ferrer; William L Miller; Raymond F Palmer; Robert Wood; Marivel Davila; Elizabeth E Stewart; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Judith H Hibbard; Jessica Greene; Edmund R Becker; Douglas Roblin; Michael W Painter; Debra J Perez; Edith Burbank-Schmitt; Martin Tusler Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Robert J Reid; Katie Coleman; Eric A Johnson; Paul A Fishman; Clarissa Hsu; Michael P Soman; Claire E Trescott; Michael Erikson; Eric B Larson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Edward H Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D Mahoney; Robert J Reid; Sarah M Greene Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth L Tung; Yue Gao; Monica E Peek; Robert S Nocon; Kathryn E Gunter; Sang Mee Lee; Marshall H Chin Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Lori A Bilello; Allyson Hall; Jeffrey Harman; Christopher Scuderi; Nipa Shah; Jon C Mills; Shenae Samuels Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.497