Literature DB >> 25310420

Cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.

Prabhakar Rajiah1, Michael A Bolen.   

Abstract

Although 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is well established in neuroradiology and musculoskeletal imaging, it is in the nascent stages in cardiovascular imaging applications, and there is limited literature on this topic. The primary advantage of 3 T over 1.5 T is a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which can be used as such or traded off to improve spatial or temporal resolution and decrease acquisition time. However, the actual gain in SNR is limited by other factors and modifications in sequences adapted for use at 3 T. Higher resonance frequencies result in improved spectral resolution, which is beneficial for fat suppression and spectroscopy. The higher T1 values of tissues at 3 T aid in myocardial tagging, angiography, and perfusion and delayed-enhancement sequences. However, there are substantial challenges with 3-T cardiac MR imaging, including higher magnetic field and radiofrequency inhomogeneities and susceptibility effects, which diminish image quality. Off-resonance artifacts are particularly challenging, especially with steady-state free precession sequences. These artifacts can be managed by using higher-order shimming, frequency scouts, or low repetition times. B1 inhomogeneities can be managed by using radiofrequency shimming, multitransmit coils, or adiabatic pulses. Chemical shifts are also increased at 3 T. The higher radiofrequency results in higher radiofrequency deposition power and a higher specific absorption rate. MR angiography, dynamic first-pass perfusion sequences, myocardial tagging, and MR spectroscopy are more effective at 3 T, whereas delayed-enhancement, flow quantification, and black-blood sequences are comparable at 1.5 T and 3 T. Knowledge of the relevant physics helps in identifying artifacts and modifying sequences to optimize image quality. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25310420     DOI: 10.1148/rg.346140048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  23 in total

Review 1.  Update on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Animesh Tandon; Gerald F Greil; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Low-Field Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Compelling Case for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance's Future.

Authors:  Orlando P Simonetti; Rizwan Ahmad
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography: what is new and how does it compare with myocardial perfusion imaging and other modalities?

Authors:  Marysia S Tweet; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Nandan S Anavekar; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac imaging on a 3T scanner with parallel RF transmission technique: prospective comparison of 3D-PSIR and 3D-IR.

Authors:  Anthony Schultz; Thibault Caspar; Mickaël Schaeffer; Aïssam Labani; Mi-Young Jeung; Soraya El Ghannudi; Catherine Roy; Mickaël Ohana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Accelerated MRI for the assessment of cardiac function.

Authors:  Leon Axel; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Local Multi-Channel RF Surface Coil versus Body RF Coil Transmission for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 3 Tesla: Which Configuration Is Winning the Game?

Authors:  Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Matthias A Dieringer; Antje Els; Celal Oezerdem; Jan Rieger; Andre Kuehne; Antonino M Cassara; Harald Pfeiffer; Friedrich Wetterling; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cross-sectional imaging of aortic infections.

Authors:  D J Murphy; A R Keraliya; M D Agrawal; A Aghayev; M L Steigner
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-10-19

8.  The impact of dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission with patient-adaptive shimming on the cardiac magnetic resonance in children at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Haipeng Wang; Liyun Qiu; Guangbin Wang; Fei Gao; Haipeng Jia; Junyu Zhao; Weibo Chen; Cuiyan Wang; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Vascular CT and MRI: a practical guide to imaging protocols.

Authors:  D J Murphy; A Aghayev; M L Steigner
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14

10.  Incremental Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Further Characterizing Hypodense Mediastinal and Paracardiac Lesions Identified on Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Abhishek Chaturvedi; Chris Gange; Hakan Sahin; Apeksha Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.