Literature DB >> 25310166

[How to critically assess systematic reviews and meta-analyses?].

Otávio Berwanger1, Erica Aranha Suzumura1, Anna Maria Buehler1, João Bosco Oliveira1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews are important knowledge generating tools to help the decision making process in the Critical Care Unit. This narrative aims to describe the important elements used to critically appraise intensive care-related systematic reviews. CONTENTS: When critically assessing systematic reviews, one should pay particular attention to the importance and appropriateness of the research question, the search strategy, the inclusion criteria and methodological quality of the studies included, and the methods of data extraction. In addition, a relevant systematic review must have consistent data (in case of a meta-analysis) or the cause of the heterogeneity must have been adequately explored, and results must be applicable in critical patients.
CONCLUSIONS: To apply correctly the available scientific evidence, one should critically assess data quality of systematic reviews, selecting the relevant information to manage the critically ill patient.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 25310166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva        ISSN: 0103-507X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the heterogeneity of studies estimating the association between risk factors and the use of potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the elderly: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Patrícia A L Santos; Daniel Tenório da Silva; Genival Araujo dos Santos Júnior; Carina Carvalho Silvestre; Marco Antônio Prado Nunes; Divaldo Pereira Lyra; Angelo Roberto Antoniolli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The Effect of Neurofeedback on the Reaction Time and Cognitive Performance of Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michele Andrade de Brito; José Raimundo Fernandes; Natã Sant'Anna Esteves; Vanessa Teixeira Müller; Daniella Brito Alexandria; Diego Ignacio Valenzuela Pérez; Maamer Slimani; Ciro José Brito; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Bianca Miarka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 3.  Physical activity and quality of life among college students without comorbidities for cardiometabolic diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lívia Carvalho Sette Abrantes; Núbia de Souza de Morais; Vivian Siqueira Santos Gonçalves; Sarah Aparecida Vieira Ribeiro; Catarina Maria Nogueira de Oliveira Sediyama; Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini; Paulo Roberto Dos Santos Amorim; Silvia Eloiza Priore
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 4.  Quality of life and treatment adherence in hypertensive patients: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Célia Caetano de Souza; José Wicto Pereira Borges; Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Different research designs and their characteristics in intensive care.

Authors:  Wagner Luis Nedel; Fernando da Silveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016-09

6.  The FIFA 11+ injury prevention program for soccer players: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Sadigursky; Juliana Almeida Braid; Diogo Neiva Lemos De Lira; Bruno Almeida Barreto Machado; Rogério Jamil Fernandes Carneiro; Paulo Oliveira Colavolpe
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.