AIM: To clarify the diabetes prevalence trends among the rural population in northern China. METHODS: All eligible permanent residents aged ≥ 35 years in selected rural villages of Liaoning province were invited to participate in the study. A total of 11 600 people completed all questionnaires and were included in the study. The response rate was 85.3%. Fasting plasma glucose levels were measured after at least 12 h of fasting and diabetes was diagnosed according to WHO criteria, i.e. fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l and/or being on treatment for diabetes. Impaired fasting glucose was defined according to the 1997 and the 2010 American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria (6.1-6.9 and 5.6-6.9 mmol/l, respectively). Previous diagnoses of diabetes were assessed on the basis of self-reports. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes among adults in the rural population was 10.6% (10.0% in men and 11.1% in women). The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose was 13.0 and 36.1% according to the 1997 and the 2010 ADA criteria, respectively. The prevalence of previously diagnosed diabetes was 4.3% among the whole population (3.3% in men and 5.1% in women). The prevalence of previously diagnosed diabetes was 34.8% in men and 50.2% in women. Only 29.6% of men and 42% of women with diabetes had taken oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin to lower their blood sugar. In multivariate analysis, age, drinking habits, BMI, dyslipidaemia and family history of diabetes were identified as independent risk factors for diabetes, and occupational physical activity, smoking and lean meat intake were identified as independent protective factors for diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose were found to be high in this rural population. Although the rate of treatment of people with diabetes has increased, the glycaemic control rate was still at a low level.
AIM: To clarify the diabetes prevalence trends among the rural population in northern China. METHODS: All eligible permanent residents aged ≥ 35 years in selected rural villages of Liaoning province were invited to participate in the study. A total of 11 600 people completed all questionnaires and were included in the study. The response rate was 85.3%. Fasting plasma glucose levels were measured after at least 12 h of fasting and diabetes was diagnosed according to WHO criteria, i.e. fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l and/or being on treatment for diabetes. Impaired fasting glucose was defined according to the 1997 and the 2010 American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria (6.1-6.9 and 5.6-6.9 mmol/l, respectively). Previous diagnoses of diabetes were assessed on the basis of self-reports. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes among adults in the rural population was 10.6% (10.0% in men and 11.1% in women). The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose was 13.0 and 36.1% according to the 1997 and the 2010 ADA criteria, respectively. The prevalence of previously diagnosed diabetes was 4.3% among the whole population (3.3% in men and 5.1% in women). The prevalence of previously diagnosed diabetes was 34.8% in men and 50.2% in women. Only 29.6% of men and 42% of women with diabetes had taken oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin to lower their blood sugar. In multivariate analysis, age, drinking habits, BMI, dyslipidaemia and family history of diabetes were identified as independent risk factors for diabetes, and occupational physical activity, smoking and lean meat intake were identified as independent protective factors for diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose were found to be high in this rural population. Although the rate of treatment of people with diabetes has increased, the glycaemic control rate was still at a low level.
Authors: Haiying Gong; Lize Pa; Ke Wang; Hebuli Mu; Fen Dong; Shengjiang Ya; Guodong Xu; Ning Tao; Li Pan; Bin Wang; Guangliang Shan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shasha Yu; Hongmei Yang; Xiaofan Guo; Liqiang Zheng; Yingxian Sun Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shuang Chen; Xiaofan Guo; Shasha Yu; Guozhe Sun; Zhao Li; Yingxian Sun Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ming Zhao; Hongbo Lin; Yanyan Yuan; Fuyan Wang; Yang Xi; Li Ming Wen; Peng Shen; Shizhong Bu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rong Su; Le Cai; Wenlong Cui; Jianhui He; Dingyun You; Allison Golden Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.390