AIMS: Incomplete revascularisation is common after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While the absolute amount of residual coronary artery disease (CAD) after PCI has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes, whether the proportion of treated CAD is prognostically important remains to be determined. We sought to quantify the proportion of CAD burden treated by PCI and to evaluate its impact on outcomes using a new prognostic instrument - the SYNTAX Revascularisation Index (SRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The baseline SYNTAX score (bSS) and residual SYNTAX score (rSS) were determined from 2,618 angiograms of patients enrolled in the prospective ACUITY trial. The SRI was then calculated for each patient using the following formula: SRI=(1-[rSS/bSS])×100. Outcomes were examined according to three SRI groups (SRI=100% [complete revascularisation], 50-99%, and <50%). The median bSS was nine (IQR 5, 16), and after PCI the median rSS was one (IQR 0, 6). The median SRI was 85% (IQR 50, 100), and was 100% in 1,079 patients (41.2%), 50-99% in 907 patients (34.6%), and <50% in 632 patients (24.1%). One-year adverse outcomes, including death, were inversely proportional to the SRI. An SRI cut-off of <80% (present in 1,189 [45.4%] patients after PCI) had the best prognostic accuracy for prediction of death (area under the curve 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.67, p<0.0001). By multivariable analysis, SRI was an independent predictor of one-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% CI: 1.05-4.35, p=0.03). However, when compared to other scores, the rSS showed superior accuracy and predictive capability for one-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The SRI is a newly described method for quantifying the proportion of CAD burden treated by PCI. Given its correlation with mortality, and pending external validation, the SRI may be useful in assessing the degree of revascularisation after PCI, with SRI ≥80% representing a reasonable goal. However, the rSS showed superior predictive capability for one-year mortality.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Incomplete revascularisation is common after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While the absolute amount of residual coronary artery disease (CAD) after PCI has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes, whether the proportion of treated CAD is prognostically important remains to be determined. We sought to quantify the proportion of CAD burden treated by PCI and to evaluate its impact on outcomes using a new prognostic instrument - the SYNTAX Revascularisation Index (SRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The baseline SYNTAX score (bSS) and residual SYNTAX score (rSS) were determined from 2,618 angiograms of patients enrolled in the prospective ACUITY trial. The SRI was then calculated for each patient using the following formula: SRI=(1-[rSS/bSS])×100. Outcomes were examined according to three SRI groups (SRI=100% [complete revascularisation], 50-99%, and <50%). The median bSS was nine (IQR 5, 16), and after PCI the median rSS was one (IQR 0, 6). The median SRI was 85% (IQR 50, 100), and was 100% in 1,079 patients (41.2%), 50-99% in 907 patients (34.6%), and <50% in 632 patients (24.1%). One-year adverse outcomes, including death, were inversely proportional to the SRI. An SRI cut-off of <80% (present in 1,189 [45.4%] patients after PCI) had the best prognostic accuracy for prediction of death (area under the curve 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.67, p<0.0001). By multivariable analysis, SRI was an independent predictor of one-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% CI: 1.05-4.35, p=0.03). However, when compared to other scores, the rSS showed superior accuracy and predictive capability for one-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The SRI is a newly described method for quantifying the proportion of CAD burden treated by PCI. Given its correlation with mortality, and pending external validation, the SRI may be useful in assessing the degree of revascularisation after PCI, with SRI ≥80% representing a reasonable goal. However, the rSS showed superior predictive capability for one-year mortality.
Authors: Marcelo Harada Ribeiro; Carlos M Campos; Lucio Padilla; Antonio Carlos B da Silva; João Eduardo T de Paula; Marco Alcantara; Ricardo Santiago; Franklin Hanna; Franciele R da Silva; Karlyse C Belli; Lorenzo Azzalini; Pedro P de Oliveira; Gustavo N Araujo; Vincenzo Sucato; Kambis Mashayekhi; Alfredo R Galassi; Alexandre Abizaid; Alexandre Quadros Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Vinayak Nagaraja; Sze-Yuan Ooi; James Nolan; Adrian Large; Mark De Belder; Peter Ludman; Rodrigo Bagur; Nick Curzen; Takashi Matsukage; Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Chun Shing Kwok; Colin Berry; Mamas A Mamas Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Cãlin Homorodean; Adrian Corneliu Iancu; Daniel Leucuţa; Şerban Bãlãnescu; Ioana Mihaela Dregoesc; Mihai Spînu; Mihai Ober; Dan Tãtaru; Maria Olinic; Dan Bindea; Dan Olinic Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa; Fernanda Thereza de Almeida Andrade; Diego Carter; Vinicius B Seleme; Maycon Santos Costa; Carlos M Campos; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-09
Authors: Piotr Kübler; Wojciech Zimoch; Michał Kosowski; Brunon Tomasiewicz; Oscar Rakotoarison; Artur Telichowski; Krzysztof Reczuch Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 1.426