Literature DB >> 25308249

State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings.

Charles Mesguich1, Reza Fardanesh2, Lawrence Tanenbaum2, Ajai Chari3, Sundar Jagannath3, Lale Kostakoglu4.   

Abstract

18-Flurodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have higher sensitivity and specificity than whole-body X-ray (WBXR) survey in evaluating disease extent in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Both modalities are now recommended by the Durie-Salmon Plus classification although the emphasis is more on MRI than PET/CT. The presence of extra-medullary disease (EMD) as evaluated by PET/CT imaging, initial SUVmax and number of focal lesions (FL) are deemed to be strong prognostic parameters at staging. MRI remains the most sensitive technique for the detection of diffuse bone marrow involvement in both the pre and post-therapy setting. Compression fractures are best characterized with MRI signal changes, for determining vertebroplasty candidates. While PET/CT allows for earlier and more specific evaluation of therapeutic efficacy compared to MRI, when signal abnormalities persist years after treatment. PET/CT interpretation, however, can be challenging in the vertebral column and pelvis as well as in cases with post-therapy changes. Hence, a reading approach combining the high sensitivity of MRI and superior specificity of FDG PET/CT would be preferred to increase the diagnostic accuracy. In summary, the established management methods in MM, mainly relying on biological tumor parameters should be complemented with functional imaging data, both at staging and restaging for optimal management of MM.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Multiple myeloma; PET/CT; Staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25308249     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  19 in total

Review 1.  Minimal residual disease testing after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sherrod; P Hari; C A Mosse; R C Walker; R F Cornell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for determining survival outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma classified as stage II and III with the Revised International Staging System.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Seong Young Kwon; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Seo-Yeon Ahn; Seung-Yeon Jung; Seung-Shin Lee; Moo-Rim Park; Deok-Hwan Yang; Jae-Sook Ahn; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Je-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe).

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Annibale Versari; Stephane Chauvie; Elisa Bertone; Andrea Bianchi; Marco Rensi; Marilena Bellò; Andrea Gallamini; Francesca Patriarca; Francesca Gay; Barbara Gamberi; Pietro Ghedini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti; Elena Zamagni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Multimodality imaging of osseous involvement In haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Abhishek R Keraliya; Katherine M Krajewski; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Atul B Shinagare; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Sree H Tirumani; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prognostic significance of normalized FDG-PET parameters in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing induction chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Daria Ripani; Carmelo Caldarella; Tommaso Za; Daniele Antonio Pizzuto; Elena Rossi; Valerio De Stefano; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Role of FDG PET in the staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Joao R T Vicentini; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Therapy assessment in multiple myeloma with PET.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  [Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in multiple myeloma].

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  18F-fluorocholine versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected relapsing or progressive multiple myeloma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Thibaut Cassou-Mounat; Sona Balogova; Valérie Nataf; Marie Calzada; Virginie Huchet; Khaldoun Kerrou; Jean-Yves Devaux; Mohamad Mohty; Jean-Noël Talbot; Laurent Garderet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Osteolytic lesions, cytogenetic features and bone marrow levels of cytokines and chemokines in multiple myeloma patients: Role of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20.

Authors:  B Dalla Palma; D Guasco; M Pedrazzoni; M Bolzoni; F Accardi; F Costa; G Sammarelli; L Craviotto; M De Filippo; L Ruffini; P Omedè; R Ria; F Aversa; N Giuliani
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.