Literature DB >> 25308044

Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures?

Lucian B Solomon1, Saleem M Hussenbocus, Tania A Carbone, Stuart A Callary, Donald W Howie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision surgery is currently the recommended treatment for Vancouver B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures, but isolated open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) might be an effective treatment for these fractures around cemented collarless polished tapered (CCPT) stems, as these stems can re-engage in the cement mantle, regaining stability following internal fixation. The aim of this study was to determine the operative risks, post-operative complications, and radiographic and functional outcomes in two cohorts of Vancouver B2 femoral fractures around CCPT stems treated either by ORIF alone or revision surgery.
METHODS: The results of 12 patients with B2 periprosthetic fractures around a CCPT stems treated by ORIF alone (median follow-up 67 months) were compared with those of nine patients with a similar fracture treated by revision surgery (median follow-up 59 months).
RESULTS: All fractures treated by ORIF alone healed and all stems restabilized and remained stable within their original cement mantle. These patients had significantly shorter overall operating room times (P = 0.002), surgical times (P = 0.002) and required fewer units of blood transfusion (P = 0.008) than patients in the revision cohort. In the ORIF cohort, one patient had two dislocations. In the revision cohort, one patient had delayed wound healing, a second patient had delayed wound healing and two dislocations, and a third patient had two dislocations.
CONCLUSION: Although further studies with larger numbers are required, treatment of these fractures with ORIF alone may be a viable alternative to revision surgery as it reduces the operative risks involved.
© 2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vancouver B2; fractures; internal fixation; periprosthetic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25308044     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  11 in total

1.  Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.

Authors:  Sagi Martinov; Sebastien D'ulisse; Edouard Haumont; Dragos Schiopu; Pieter Reynders; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate.

Authors:  Mauro Spina; Andrea Scalvi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 3.  Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David González-Martín; Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Mario Herrera-Pérez; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Miriam Garrido-Miguel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Vancouver B2 Fracture Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. A Multicenter Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Biberthaler; Patrick Pflüger; Markus Wurm; Marc Hanschen; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Joseph Aderinto; George Whitwell; Peter V Giannoudis; Nikolaos Kanakaris
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.884

5.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate.

Authors:  C Baum; M Leimbacher; P Kriechling; A Platz; D Cadosch
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-24

6.  Outcome of surgical treatment of 54 Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty at mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Daniele Fabbri; Matteo Romantini; Massimo Laus; Alfonso Calogero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-03

7.  Revision rate is higher in patients with periprosthetic femur fractures following revision arthroplasty in comparison with ORIF following our algorithm: a two-center 1 analysis of 129 patients.

Authors:  Patrick Pflüger; Eftychios Bolierakis; Markus Wurm; Klemens Horst; Frank Hildebrand; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  A Rare Case of Open 3A VTB2W Periprosthetic Fracture around a Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Veenesh Selvaratnam; Al-Amin Kassam; Matthew J W Hubble
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2022-03

Review 9.  Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  David González-Martín; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Ayron Guerra-Ferraz; Jorge Ojeda-Jiménez; Mario Herrera-Pérez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04

10.  Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Michael Blauth; Alexander Joeris; Andrea Blumenthal; Elke Rometsch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.