Literature DB >> 25307886

Single-center, single-blinded, randomized study of self-gripping versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.

Ceith Nikkolo1, Tiit Vaasna2, Marko Murruste2, Helmut Seepter2, Jaanus Suumann2, Andres Tein2, Ülle Kirsimägi2, Urmas Lepner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate whether usage of self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair, compared with standard Lichtenstein repair with sutured mesh, could result in a decreased rate of chronic pain at 6-mo follow-up. The secondary outcome was to evaluate foreign body feeling and the quality of life after inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS: The patients were randomized into two study groups as follows: the OLP group received Optilene LP mesh and the PPG group received self-gripping Parietex ProGrip mesh. Pain scores were measured on a visual analog scale. Foreign body feeling was registered as a yes or no question. Quality of life was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 75 patients in the OLP group and 70 patients in the PPG group were included in the analysis. According to the primary end point, 45.3% and 31.4% of the patients in the OLP group and PPG group experienced pain during different activities at 6-mo follow-up, respectively (P = 0.092). Per secondary end point, 22.7% in the OLP group and 40% in the PPG group reported foreign body feeling at the operation site at 6-mo follow-up (P = 0.031, risk ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.29-1.07). There were no significant differences in any domain of quality of life according to the Short-Form 36 questionnaire between the two study groups at 6-mo follow-up, except for the social functioning domain (P = 0.035). In the OLP group, the quality of life scores improved significantly after operation in all domains except for general health and mental health. In the PPG group, the quality of life scores improved significantly after operation in the domains of bodily pain, physical functioning, and physical role.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-gripping mesh compared with standard Lichtenstein operation has no advantages in reducing chronic pain 6-mo after surgery. The rate of foreign body feeling was higher in the self-gripping mesh group. Scores of bodily pain, physical functioning, and physical role improved significantly in both study groups after hernia surgery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Foreign body feeling; Inguinal hernia; Lichtenstein hernioplasty; Quality of life; Self-gripping mesh

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25307886     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

1.  An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Merritt Denham; Brandon Johnson; Michelle Leong; Kristine Kuchta; Eliza Conaty; Michael B Ujiki; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; Zeeshan Butt; JoAnn Carbray; Matt Gitelis; John G Linn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result.

Authors:  J K M Fan; J Yip; D C C Foo; O S H Lo; W L Law
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S van Steensel; L K van Vugt; A K Al Omar; E H H Mommers; S O Breukink; L P S Stassen; B Winkens; N D Bouvy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-02-27

5.  Comparison between self-gripping, semi re-absorbable meshes with polyethylene meshes in Lichtenstein, tension-free hernia repair: preliminary results from a single center.

Authors:  Luigi Percalli; Renato Pricolo; Luigi Passalia; Matteo Riccò
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-03-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.