Literature DB >> 25307417

Assessing the generalizability of randomized trial results to target populations.

Elizabeth A Stuart1, Catherine P Bradshaw, Philip J Leaf.   

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing interest in and attention to evidence-based practices, where the "evidence" generally comes from well-conducted randomized trials. However, while those trials yield accurate estimates of the effect of the intervention for the participants in the trial (known as "internal validity"), they do not always yield relevant information about the effects in a particular target population (known as "external validity"). This may be due to a lack of specification of a target population when designing the trial, difficulties recruiting a sample that is representative of a prespecified target population, or to interest in considering a target population somewhat different from the population directly targeted by the trial. This paper first provides an overview of existing design and analysis methods for assessing and enhancing the ability of a randomized trial to estimate treatment effects in a target population. It then provides a case study using one particular method, which weights the subjects in a randomized trial to match the population on a set of observed characteristics. The case study uses data from a randomized trial of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS); our interest is in generalizing the results to the state of Maryland. In the case of PBIS, after weighting, estimated effects in the target population were similar to those observed in the randomized trial. The paper illustrates that statistical methods can be used to assess and enhance the external validity of randomized trials, making the results more applicable to policy and clinical questions. However, there are also many open research questions; future research should focus on questions of treatment effect heterogeneity and further developing these methods for enhancing external validity. Researchers should think carefully about the external validity of randomized trials and be cautious about extrapolating results to specific populations unless they are confident of the similarity between the trial sample and that target population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25307417      PMCID: PMC4359056          DOI: 10.1007/s11121-014-0513-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  24 in total

1.  Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  T C Prevost; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  External Validity in Policy Evaluations that Choose Sites Purposively.

Authors:  Robert B Olsen; Larry L Orr; Stephen H Bell; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2013

3.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Catherine P Bradshaw; Christine W Koth; Leslie A Thornton; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2009-06

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

6.  The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Stephen R Cole; Catherine P Bradshaw; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 7.  Generalizability of studies on mental health treatment and outcomes, 1981 to 1996.

Authors:  Joel T Braslow; Naihua Duan; Sarah L Starks; Antonio Polo; Elizabeth Bromley; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on child behavior problems.

Authors:  Catherine P Bradshaw; Tracy E Waasdorp; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR*D report.

Authors:  Stephen R Wisniewski; A John Rush; Andrew A Nierenberg; Bradley N Gaynes; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Patrick J McGrath; Philip W Lavori; Michael E Thase; Maurizio Fava; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Bias modelling in evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; David J Spiegelhalter; Gordon C S Smith; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

View more
  56 in total

1.  Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1.

Authors:  Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Katrina L Kezios; Stephen J Mooney; Gina Lovasi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials: application to the National Institute of Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.

Authors:  Ryoko Susukida; Rosa M Crum; Cyrus Ebnesajjad; Elizabeth A Stuart; Ramin Mojtabai
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  New methods for generalizability and transportability: the new norm.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Can Policy Promote Adoption or Outcomes of Evidence-based Prevention Programming?: a Case Illustration of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.

Authors:  Catherine P Bradshaw; Elise T Pas; Rashelle J Musci; Joseph M Kush; Ji Hoon Ryoo
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-06-08

5.  Bringing Evidence to Bear on Public Health in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin M Callahan; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Sample Selection for Medicare Risk Adjustment Due to Systematically Missing Data.

Authors:  Savannah L Bergquist; Thomas G McGuire; Timothy J Layton; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Characteristics of School Districts That Participate in Rigorous National Educational Evaluations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Stephen H Bell; Cyrus Ebnesajjad; Robert B Olsen; Larry L Orr
Journal:  J Res Educ Eff       Date:  2016-10-03

8.  Generalizing Treatment Effect Estimates From Sample to Population: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Finding Sufficient Data.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Anna Rhodes
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2016-08-04

9.  Estimation of Population Average Treatment Effects in the FIRST Trial: Application of a Propensity Score-Based Stratification Approach.

Authors:  Jeanette W Chung; Karl Y Bilimoria; Jonah J Stulberg; Christopher M Quinn; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Improving Depression Among HIV-Infected Adults: Transporting the Effect of a Depression Treatment Intervention to Routine Care.

Authors:  Angela M Bengtson; Brian W Pence; Bradley N Gaynes; E Byrd Quinlivan; Amy D Heine; Julie K OʼDonnell; Heidi M Crane; W Christopher Mathews; Richard D Moore; Daniel Westreich; Conall OʼCleirigh; Katerina Christopoulos; Matthew J Mimiaga; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.