Literature DB >> 25306277

Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli.

R V Pereira1, J D Siler2, J C Ng2, M A Davis3, L D Warnick2.   

Abstract

Group housing of preweaned dairy calves is a growing practice in the United States. The objective of this practice is to increase the average daily gain of calves in a healthy and humane environment while reducing labor requirements. However, feeding protocols, commingling of calves, and occurrence of disease in different calf-housing systems may affect the prevalence of antimicrobial drug-resistant bacteria. This study evaluated the effect of a group pen-housing system and individual pen-housing system on antimicrobial resistance trends in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves and on the prevalence of environmental Salmonella. Twelve farms from central New York participated in the study: 6 farms using an individual pen-housing system (IP), and 6 farms using a group pen-housing system (GP). A maximum of 3 fecal E. coli isolates per calf was tested for susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial drugs using a Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay. Calves in GP had a significantly higher proportion of E. coli resistant to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, whereas calves in IP had a significantly higher proportion of E. coli resistant to ampicillin, ceftiofur, gentamycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. Calf-housing system had an effect on resistance to individual antimicrobial drugs in E. coli, but no clear-cut advantage to either system was noted with regard to overall resistance frequency. No outstanding difference in the richness and diversity of resistant phenotypes was observed between the 2 calf-housing systems.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial resistance; calf-housing system; group housing; individual pens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25306277      PMCID: PMC4351789          DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  31 in total

1.  Agar disk diffusion and automated microbroth dilution produce similar antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for Salmonella serotypes Newport, Typhimurium, and 4,5,12:i-, but differ in economic cost.

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Kevin J Cummings; Lorin D Warnick; Ynte H Schukken; Julie D Siler; Yrjo T Gröhn; Margaret A Davis; Tom E Besser; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.171

2.  In vitro susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrhoeic dairy calves to 15 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J A Orden; J A Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria; S García; D Cid; R De La Fuente
Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health       Date:  2000-06

3.  Use of a nonmedicated dietary supplement correlates with increased prevalence of streptomycin-sulfa-tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli on a dairy farm.

Authors:  Artashes R Khachatryan; Thomas E Besser; Dale D Hancock; Douglas R Call
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  An evaluation of two management systems for rearing calves fed milk replacer.

Authors:  L Kung; S Demarco; L N Siebenson; E Joyner; G F Haenlein; R M Morris
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Associations between antimicrobial resistance genes in fecal generic Escherichia coli isolates from cow-calf herds in western Canada.

Authors:  Sheryl P Gow; Cheryl L Waldner; Josee Harel; Patrick Boerlin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Abomasal pH, nutrient digestibility, and growth of Holstein bull calves fed acidified milk replacer.

Authors:  S T Woodford; H D Whetstone; M R Murphy; C L Davis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: A critical step for developing risk management strategies for the use of antimicrobials in food production animals.

Authors:  Peter Collignon; John H Powers; Tom M Chiller; Awa Aidara-Kane; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Evaluation of ad libitum acidified milk replacer programs for dairy calves.

Authors:  T M Hill; H G Bateman; J M Aldrich; J D Quigley; R L Schlotterbeck
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in Escherichia coli from Swedish dairy calves.

Authors:  Kerstin de Verdier; Ann Nyman; Christina Greko; Björn Bengtsson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Respiratory infections in Norwegian dairy calves.

Authors:  S M Gulliksen; E Jor; K I Lie; T Løken; J Akerstedt; O Østerås
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of heifer-raising practices on E. coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers.

Authors:  R V Pereira; J D Siler; K J Cummings; M A Davis; L D Warnick
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Observational study on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from Ontario calf samples submitted to a diagnostic laboratory from 2007 to 2020.

Authors:  Tamaki Uyama; David Renaud; Stephen LeBlanc; J McClure; Durda Slavic; Charlotte Winder; David Kelton
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.075

3.  Impacts of feeding preweaned calves milk containing drug residues on the functional profile of the fecal microbiota.

Authors:  Richard Van Vleck Pereira; Laura M Carroll; Svetlana Lima; Carla Foditsch; Julie D Siler; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho; Lorin D Warnick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Characterization of the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Healthy and Diarrheic Dairy Calves.

Authors:  D E Gomez; L G Arroyo; M C Costa; L Viel; J S Weese
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Antimicrobial resistance trends in fecal Salmonella isolates from northern California dairy cattle admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital, 2002-2016.

Authors:  Kelly E Davidson; Barbara A Byrne; Alda F A Pires; K Gary Magdesian; Richard V Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparative occurrence and antibiogram of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli among post-weaned calves and lactating cows from smallholder dairy farms in a parallel animal husbandry area.

Authors:  Chya Vannakovida; Kannika Na Lampang; Phongsakorn Chuammitri; Veerasak Punyapornwithaya; Khwanchai Kreausukon; Raktham Mektrirat
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-05-26

7.  Effects of treatment with enrofloxacin or tulathromycin on fecal microbiota composition and genetic function of dairy calves.

Authors:  Carla Foditsch; Richard V V Pereira; Julie D Siler; Craig Altier; Lorin D Warnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Invited Review: Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Pathogens Associated with Diarrhea and Pneumonia in Dairy Calves.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Xia Yi; Haohua Zhuang; Zhaoju Deng; Chong Ma
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.