Literature DB >> 25306190

Minimizing the risk of preoperative brain injury in neonates with aortic arch obstruction.

Selma O Algra1, Felix Haas1, Kenneth J Poskitt2, Floris Groenendaal3, Antonius N J Schouten4, Nicolaas J G Jansen5, Anthony Azakie6, Sanjiv Gandhi7, Andrew Campbell7, Steven P Miller8, Patrick S McQuillen9, Linda S de Vries10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prenatal diagnosis lowers the risk of preoperative brain injury by assessing differences in the incidence of preoperative brain injury across centers. STUDY
DESIGN: From 2 prospective cohorts of newborns with complex congenital heart disease studied by preoperative cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, one cohort from the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) and a combined cohort from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and University of British Columbia (UBC), patients with aortic arch obstruction were selected and their imaging and clinical course reviewed.
RESULTS: Birth characteristics were comparable between UMCU (n = 33) and UCSF/UBC (n = 54). Patients had a hypoplastic aortic arch with either coarctation/interruption or hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In subjects with prenatal diagnosis, there was a significant difference in the prevalence of white matter injury (WMI) between centers (11 of 22 [50%] at UMCU vs 4 of 30 [13%] at UCSF/UBC; P < .01). Prenatal diagnosis was protective for WMI at UCSF/UBC (13% prenatal diagnoses vs 50% postnatal diagnoses; P < .01), but not at UMCU (50% vs 46%, respectively; P > .99). Differences in clinical practice between prenatally diagnosed subjects at UMCU vs UCSF/UBC included older age at surgery, less time spent in the intensive care unit, greater use of diuretics, less use of total parenteral nutrition (P < .01), and a greater incidence of infections (P = .01). In patients diagnosed postnatally, the prevalence of WMI was similar in the 2 centers (46% at UMCU vs 50% at UCSF/UBC; P > .99). Stroke prevalence was similar in the 2 centers regardless of prenatal diagnosis (prenatal diagnosis: 4.5% at Utrecht vs 6.7% at UCSF/UBC, P = .75; postnatal diagnosis: 9.1% vs 13%, respectively, P > .99).
CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis can be protective for WMI, but this protection may be dependent on specific clinical management practices that differ across centers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25306190      PMCID: PMC4624274          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  23 in total

1.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities after the Norwood procedure using regional cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  Catherine L Dent; James P Spaeth; Blaise V Jones; Steven M Schwartz; Tracy A Glauser; Barbara Hallinan; Jeffrey M Pearl; Philip R Khoury; C Dean Kurth
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  The influence of prenatal diagnosis on postnatal outcome in patients with structural congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Robert S Yates
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Does fetal diagnosis make a difference?

Authors:  Meryl S Cohen; Michele A Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Long-term neuromotor outcome at school entry of infants with congenital heart defects requiring open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Annette Majnemer; Catherine Limperopoulos; Michael Shevell; Bernard Rosenblatt; Charles Rohlicek; Christo Tchervenkov
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Balloon atrial septostomy is associated with preoperative stroke in neonates with transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Patrick S McQuillen; Shannon E G Hamrick; Marta J Perez; A James Barkovich; David V Glidden; Tom R Karl; David Teitel; Steven P Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Survival after reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A 15-year experience from a single institution.

Authors:  W T Mahle; T L Spray; G Wernovsky; J W Gaynor; B J Clark
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Efficacy and safety of milrinone in preventing low cardiac output syndrome in infants and children after corrective surgery for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Timothy M Hoffman; Gil Wernovsky; Andrew M Atz; Thomas J Kulik; David P Nelson; Anthony C Chang; James M Bailey; Akbar Akbary; John F Kocsis; Raymond Kaczmarek; Thomas L Spray; David L Wessel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Periventricular leukomalacia is common after neonatal cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Kristin K Galli; Robert A Zimmerman; Gail P Jarvik; Gil Wernovsky; Marijn K Kuypers; Robert R Clancy; Lisa M Montenegro; William T Mahle; Mark F Newman; Ann M Saunders; Susan C Nicolson; Thomas L Spray; J William Gaynor; Kristen K Galli
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Risk factors for preoperative periventricular leukomalacia in term neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome are patient related.

Authors:  Donna A Goff; David M Shera; Stephen Tang; Natasha A Lavin; Susan M Durning; Susan C Nicolson; Lisa M Montenegro; Jonathan J Rome; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Arastoo Vossough; Daniel J Licht
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Effect of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes in D-transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Jodi M Bartlett; David Wypij; David C Bellinger; Leonard A Rappaport; Linda J Heffner; Richard A Jonas; Jane W Newburger
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Congenital cardiac anomalies and white matter injury.

Authors:  Paul D Morton; Nobuyuki Ishibashi; Richard A Jonas; Vittorio Gallo
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Association of Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease With Postnatal Brain Development and the Risk of Brain Injury.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Veronica De Santiago; Elavazhagan Chakkarapani; Vann Chau; Andrew Campbell; Kenneth J Poskitt; Duan Xu; A James Barkovich; Steven Miller; Patrick McQuillen
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 3.  The Congenital Heart Disease Brain: Prenatal Considerations for Perioperative Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Cynthia M Ortinau; Joshua S Shimony
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 4.  Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities and Congenital Heart Disease: Insights Into Altered Brain Maturation.

Authors:  Paul D Morton; Nobuyuki Ishibashi; Richard A Jonas
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  A Uniform Description of Perioperative Brain MRI Findings in Infants with Severe Congenital Heart Disease: Results of a European Collaboration.

Authors:  R Stegeman; M Feldmann; N H P Claessens; N J G Jansen; J M P J Breur; L S de Vries; T Logeswaran; B Reich; W Knirsch; R Kottke; C Hagmann; B Latal; J Simpson; K Pushparajah; A F Bonthrone; C J Kelly; S Arulkumaran; M A Rutherford; S J Counsell; M J N L Benders
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  The path forward is to look backward in time: fetal physiology: the new frontier in managing infants with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Daniel J Licht
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Early-Emerging Sulcal Patterns Are Atypical in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Cynthia M Ortinau; Caitlin K Rollins; Ali Gholipour; Hyuk Jin Yun; Mackenzie Marshall; Borjan Gagoski; Onur Afacan; Kevin Friedman; Wayne Tworetzky; Simon K Warfield; Jane W Newburger; Terrie E Inder; P Ellen Grant; Kiho Im
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Fetal brain growth and risk of postnatal white matter injury in critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Jessie Mei Lim; Davide Marini; Duan Xu; V Mohan Reddy; A James Barkovich; Steven Miller; Patrick McQuillen; Mike Seed
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.439

9.  Neuroprotective Drugs in Infants With Severe Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raymond Stegeman; Kaya D Lamur; Agnes van den Hoogen; Johannes M P J Breur; Floris Groenendaal; Nicolaas J G Jansen; Manon J N L Benders
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Onset of brain injury in infants with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Mirthe J Mebius; Catherina M Bilardo; Martin C J Kneyber; Marco Modestini; Tjark Ebels; Rolf M F Berger; Arend F Bos; Elisabeth M W Kooi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.