Literature DB >> 25305196

Number of imputations needed to stabilize estimated treatment difference in longitudinal data analysis.

Kaifeng Lu1.   

Abstract

Multiple imputation procedures replace each missing value with a set of plausible values based on the posterior predictive distribution of missing data given observed data. In many applications, as few as five imputations are adequate to achieve high efficiency relative to an infinite number of imputations. However, substantially more imputations are often needed to stabilize imputation-based inference at the analysis stage. Imputation-based inference at the analysis stage is considered stable if the conditional variability of the multiple imputation estimator, half-width of 95% confidence interval, test statistic, and estimated fraction of missing information given observed data is within specified thresholds for simulation error. For the estimation of treatment difference at study end for normally distributed responses in longitudinal trials, we calculate the multiple imputation quantities for an infinite number of imputations analytically and use simulations to assess the variability of the number of imputations needed at the analysis stage in repeated sampling.

Keywords:  coefficient of variation; conditional variability; multiple imputation; randomized trial; repeated sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25305196     DOI: 10.1177/0962280214554439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  7 in total

1.  Provider fidelity and modifications to cognitive processing therapy in a diverse community health clinic: Associations with clinical change.

Authors:  Luana Marques; Sarah E Valentine; Debra Kaysen; Margaret-Anne Mackintosh; Louise E Dixon De Silva; Emily M Ahles; Soo Jeong Youn; Derri L Shtasel; Naomi M Simon; Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2019-04

2.  Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Taehun Lee; Amanda J Fairchild; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  dynr.mi: An R Program for Multiple Imputation in Dynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Yanling Li; Linying Ji; Zita Oravecz; Timothy R Brick; Michael D Hunter; Sy-Miin Chow
Journal:  World Acad Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2019

4.  Magnitude of problematic anger and its predictors in the Millennium Cohort.

Authors:  Amy B Adler; Cynthia A LeardMann; Kimberly A Roenfeldt; Isabel G Jacobson; David Forbes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Client-level predictors of treatment engagement, outcome and dropout: moving beyond demographics.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Youn; Margaret-Anne Mackintosh; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Kaylie A Patrick; Yesenia Aguilar Silvan; Anna D Bartuska; Derri L Shtasel; Luana Marques
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Bootstrap inference for multiple imputation under uncongeniality and misspecification.

Authors:  Jonathan W Bartlett; Rachael A Hughes
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study.

Authors:  Giulia Carreras; Guido Miccinesi; Andrew Wilcock; Nancy Preston; Daan Nieboer; Luc Deliens; Mogensm Groenvold; Urska Lunder; Agnes van der Heide; Michela Baccini
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.