Literature DB >> 25305044

Early predictors of acetabular growth after closed reduction in late detected developmental dysplasia of the hip.

YiQiang Li1, HongWen Xu, JingChun Li, LingJia Yu, YuanZhong Liu, Edward Southern, HongSheng Liu.   

Abstract

This study evaluates improvement of the acetabular index (AI) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip at 4 years after closed reduction, and determines the association between the final AI and a set of factors. Sixty-two patients (74 hips) treated with closed reduction were categorized into three groups according to age: group A (0-12 months, 18 hips), group B (13-18 months, 24 hips), and group C (>18 months, 32 hips). There was no difference in AI among the three groups before reduction (P=0.293). In groups A and C, the AI decreased significantly over time until 3 years after reduction and no differences were observed between the time points of 3 and 4 years. At 4 years after reduction, the AI of group C was significantly higher than that of groups A (P<0.001) and B (P=0.012). The overall AI improvement rate was 28.63%. The AI improvement rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group C (P=0.005). Pearson correlation analysis indicated no correlation between center-head distance discrepancy and the final AI (P=0.811). Linear regression suggested that age and initial AI correlated significantly with the final AI (R=0.617, F=15.031, P<0.001). Other factors, such as sex, center-edge angle of Wiberg, bilaterally involved, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, showed no correlations with the final AI (P>0.05). According to the coefficients, initial AI (β1=0.432, P<0.001) had greater effect than age (β2=0.197, P=0.023) on the final AI. In conclusion, the AI decreases in all patients after reduction and stabilizes at 3 years after reduction. The AI improvement rate is correlated negatively with age. Age and initial AI are early predictors of the progress of AI after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25305044     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  12 in total

1.  Serum prolidase activity and oxidative-antioxidative status in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip and its relationship with radiographic severity.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Altay; Cemil Ertürk; Ali Levent; Baki Volkan Çetin; Nurten Aksoy
Journal:  Redox Rep       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.412

2.  Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; YueMing Guo; Ming Li; QingHe Zhou; Yuanzhong Liu; WeiDong Chen; JingChun Li; Federico Canavese; HongWen Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiographic outcome of children older than twenty-four months with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction and spica cast immobilization in human position: a review of fifty-one hips.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; YueMing Guo; XianTao Shen; Hang Liu; HaiBo Mei; HongWen Xu; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Does Perfusion MRI After Closed Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Reduce the Incidence of Avascular Necrosis?

Authors:  Alex L Gornitzky; Andrew G Georgiadis; Mark A Seeley; B David Horn; Wudbhav N Sankar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Lisheng Kan; Jun Sun; Yapeng Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Between Closed and Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children Aged 6-24 Months.

Authors:  Shuyu Ma; Weizheng Zhou; Lianyong Li; Enbo Wang; Lijun Zhang; Qiwei Li
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.033

7.  Femoral anteversion does not predict redislocation in children with hip dysplasia treated by closed reduction.

Authors:  Kai Hong; Zhe Yuan; Jingchun Li; Yiaiqng Li; Xinwang Zhi; Yanhan Liu; Hongwen Xu; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Closed Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Early-term Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Wudbhav N Sankar; Alex L Gornitzky; Nicholas M P Clarke; José A Herrera-Soto; Simon P Kelley; Travis Matheney; Kishore Mulpuri; Emily K Schaeffer; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Nicole Williams; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Does Adductor Tenotomy Need During Closed Reduction Have a Prognostic Value in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Between 6 and 12 Months of Age? "Adductor Tenotomy in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia''.

Authors:  Hanifi Ucpunar; Muhammed Mert; Yalkin Camurcu; Hakan Sofu; Timur Yildirim; Avni Ilhan Bayhan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Association between open or closed reduction and avascular necrosis in developmental dysplasia of the hip: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ya-Jie Wang; Fan Yang; Qi-Jun Wu; Shi-Nong Pan; Lian-Yong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.