Shannon L Roberts1, Robert S Burnham, Kajeandra Ravichandiran, Anne M Agur, Eldon Y Loh. 1. From the *Division of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; †Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; and ‡Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimization of clinical outcomes of lateral branch radiofrequency ablation or blocks for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain requires precise nerve localization; however, there is a lack of comprehensive morphological studies. The objectives of this cadaveric study were to document SIJ innervation relative to bony landmarks in 3 dimensions and to identify reference points visible under ultrasound and fluoroscopy for optimal needle placement. METHODS: In 25 cadaveric hemipelves, L5-S4 lateral branches were exposed, digitized, and modeled in 3 dimensions. The models were used to compare innervation patterns between specimens and to quantify the distances of the nerves innervating the SIJ relative to the transverse sacral tubercles (TSTs) and posterior sacral foramina. Quadrants of origin of the nerves were recorded. RESULTS: The SIJ was innervated by the posterior sacral network: S1-S2 contributed in all specimens, S3 in 88%, L5 in 8%, and S4 in 4%. Most frequently, the lateral branch(es) emerged from the inferolateral S1, superolateral and inferolateral S2, and superolateral S3 quadrants. All TSTs were easily identifiable elevations that were used to landmark the nerves innervating the SIJ. The majority of branches of the posterior sacral network crossed the lateral sacral crest between TST1-3, with the greatest concentration between TST2-3. Only 3 specimens had a branch superior or inferior to these landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the innervation pattern and using bony landmarks identifiable under ultrasound and fluoroscopy, 2 radiofrequency ablation techniques were proposed. Further research is required to determine the accuracy and reliability of needle placement and to evaluate clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimization of clinical outcomes of lateral branch radiofrequency ablation or blocks for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain requires precise nerve localization; however, there is a lack of comprehensive morphological studies. The objectives of this cadaveric study were to document SIJ innervation relative to bony landmarks in 3 dimensions and to identify reference points visible under ultrasound and fluoroscopy for optimal needle placement. METHODS: In 25 cadaveric hemipelves, L5-S4 lateral branches were exposed, digitized, and modeled in 3 dimensions. The models were used to compare innervation patterns between specimens and to quantify the distances of the nerves innervating the SIJ relative to the transverse sacral tubercles (TSTs) and posterior sacral foramina. Quadrants of origin of the nerves were recorded. RESULTS: The SIJ was innervated by the posterior sacral network: S1-S2 contributed in all specimens, S3 in 88%, L5 in 8%, and S4 in 4%. Most frequently, the lateral branch(es) emerged from the inferolateral S1, superolateral and inferolateral S2, and superolateral S3 quadrants. All TSTs were easily identifiable elevations that were used to landmark the nerves innervating the SIJ. The majority of branches of the posterior sacral network crossed the lateral sacral crest between TST1-3, with the greatest concentration between TST2-3. Only 3 specimens had a branch superior or inferior to these landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the innervation pattern and using bony landmarks identifiable under ultrasound and fluoroscopy, 2 radiofrequency ablation techniques were proposed. Further research is required to determine the accuracy and reliability of needle placement and to evaluate clinical outcomes.
Authors: Simon Heinrich Bayerl; Tobias Finger; Petra Heiden; Nazli Esfahani-Bayerl; Christopher Topar; Vincent Prinz; Johannes Woitzik; Julius Dengler; Peter Vajkoczy Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Trevor J G Robinson; Shannon L Roberts; Robert S Burnham; Eldon Loh; Anne M Agur Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Niels Hammer; Robert Möbius; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Karl-Heinz Hammer; Stefan Klima; Justin S Lange; Odette Soisson; Dirk Winkler; Thomas L Milani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240