Literature DB >> 25304208

Factors affecting outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys.

Abdulkadir Tepeler1, Priyanka D Sehgal2, Tolga Akman3, Ali Unsal4, Ekrem Ozyuvali4, Abdullah Armagan3, Stephen Y Nakada2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the patient- and procedure-related factors affecting the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in horseshoe kidneys (HSKs).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of patients with stones in HSKs treated with PNL in 3 referral centers between 1998 and 2013. Demographics, along with perioperative characteristics, were evaluated in detail as to whether or not they had an effect on the success and complication rates.
RESULTS: A total of 54 HSKs with calculi in 53 patients were treated with PNL. Mean stone size was 28.4 ± 19.6 mm (range, 10-120 mm). Fifty-three patients were treated through a single tract, and 1 patient required additional access. Access was directed to the upper calyx (n = 27), middle calyx (n = 17), and lower calyx (n = 10) through the intercostal (n = 23) and subcostal (n = 31) areas. Flexible nephroscopy was used in 18.5% of the procedures. Postoperative complications were observed in 9 (16.7%) of the procedures. Success rate was 66.7% after a single session of PNL and increased to 90.7% with additional treatments. Although patient demographics, preoperative imaging, and other operative measures did not have significant effect on the complication rate, stone complexity and multiplicity, in combination with flexible nephroscopy, were found to significantly affect the success rate (P = .026, P = .043, and P = .021, respectively). However, in multivariate analysis stone multiplicity was the only factor that affected success rate (P = .004).
CONCLUSION: Stone parameters play an important role in achieving stone-free status in HSKs. Use of flexible nephroscopy positively affects the success rate by allowing reaching the peripherally located calices.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304208     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position?

Authors:  Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov; Ralph V Clayman; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?

Authors:  Ramazan Kocaaslan; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Mehmet Mazhar Utangac; Tolga Karakan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Ali Unsal; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  A new percutaneous nephrolithotomy position in horseshoe kidney: 45 degrees sided prone.

Authors:  Onur Karsli; Murat Ustuner; Bekir Voyvoda; Omur Memik; Ahmed Omer Halat; Levent Ozcan
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-08-07

4.  Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney.

Authors:  Nadeem Sohail; Amjad Albodour; Khalid M Abdelrahman; Kamran H Bhatti
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 5.  Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in anomalous kidneys: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Lavan; Thomas Herrmann; Christopher Netsch; Benedikt Becker; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?

Authors:  Abdulhakim Al Otay; Osama Sarhan; Hossam S El-Tholoth; Ahmed Alhelaly; Hamad Al Akrash; Mustafa Al Ghanbar; Khaled Al Bedaiwi; Ziad Nakshabandi; Ali Obeid
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.