| Literature DB >> 25303847 |
Bradley D Shy1, Jason S Shapiro2, Peter L Shearer2, Nicholas G Genes2, Cindy F Clesca2, Reuben J Strayer2, Lynne D Richardson2.
Abstract
For more than 25 years, emergency medicine researchers have examined 72-hour return visits as a marker for high-risk patient visits and as a surrogate measure for quality of care. Individual emergency departments frequently use 72-hour returns as a screening tool to identify deficits in care, although comprehensive departmental reviews of this nature may consume considerable resources. We discuss the lack of published data supporting the use of 72-hour return frequency as an overall performance measure and examine why this is not a valid use, describe a conceptual framework for reviewing 72-hour return cases as a screening tool, and call for future studies to test various models for conducting such quality assurance reviews of patients who return to the emergency department within 72 hours.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25303847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.08.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Emerg Med ISSN: 0735-6757 Impact factor: 2.469