Literature DB >> 25303619

Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.

Michael Y Wang1, Ram Vasudevan, Stefan A Mindea.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Adjacent-segment degeneration and stenosis are common in patients who have undergone previous lumbar fusion. Treatment typically involves a revision posterior approach, which requires management of postoperative scar tissue and previously implanted instrumentation. A minimally invasive lateral approach allows the surgeon to potentially reduce the risk of these hazards. The technique relies on indirect decompression to treat central and foraminal stenosis and placement of a graft with a large surface area to promote robust fusion and stability in concert with the surrounding tensioned ligaments. The goal in this study was to determine if lateral interbody fusion without supplemental pedicle screws is effective in treating adjacent-segment disease.
METHODS: For a 30-month study period at two institutions, the authors obtained all cases of lumbar fusion with new back and leg pain due to adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis failing conservative measures. All patients had undergone minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from the side of greater leg pain without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Patients were excluded from the study if they had undergone surgery for a nondegenerative etiology such as infection or trauma. They were also excluded if the intervention involved supplemental posterior instrumented fusion with transpedicular screws. Postoperative metrics included numeric pain scale (NPS) scores for leg and back pain. All patients underwent dynamic radiographs and CT scanning to assess stability and fusion after surgery.
RESULTS: During the 30-month study period, 21 patients (43% female) were successfully treated using minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion without the need for subsequent posterior transpedicular fixation. The mean patient age was 61 years (range 37-87 years). Four patients had two adjacent levels fused, while the remainder had single-level surgery. All patients underwent surgery without conversion to a traditional open technique, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 was used in the interbody space in all cases. The mean follow-up was 23.6 months. The mean operative time was 86 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 93 ml. There were no major intraoperative complications, but one patient underwent subsequent direct decompression in a delayed fashion. The leg pain NPS score improved from a mean of 6.3 to 1.9 (p < 0.01), and the back pain NPS score improved from a mean of 7.5 to 2.9 (p < 0.01). Intervertebral settling averaged 1.7 mm. All patients had bridging bone on CT scanning at the last follow-up, indicating solid bony fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjacent-segment stenosis and spondylosis can be treated with a number of different operative techniques. Lateral interbody fusion provides an attractive alternative with reduced blood loss and complications, as there is no need to re-explore a previous laminectomy site. In this limited series a minimally invasive lateral approach provided high fusion rates when performed with osteobiological adjuvants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ASD = adjacent-segment disease; BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; NPS = numeric pain scale; XLIF; adjacent-segment disease; bone morphogenetic protein; degenerative; interbody fusion; lumbar stenosis; minimally invasive; rhBMP-2 = recombinant human BMP–2; spine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25303619     DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  14 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Alexander O Aguirre; Mohamed A R Soliman; Shady Azmy; Asham Khan; Patrick K Jowdy; Jeffrey P Mullin; John Pollina
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Expandable Lateral Lumbar Cages With Integrated Fixation: A Viable Option for Rostral Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Carl M Blecher; Nigel R Munday; Ryan P Hamer
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-16

5.  Comparison of Stand-Alone, Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and Cranial vs Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 for the Treatment of Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Deeptee Jain; Kushagra Verma; Jeffrey Mulvihill; Jun Mizutani; Bobby Tay; Shane Burch; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

6.  Stand-alone LLIF Lateral Cage Migration: A Case Report.

Authors:  Wendy S Towers; Khalid H Kurtom
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-10-12

7.  Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and in Situ Screw Fixation for Rostral Adjacent Segment Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Young Hoon Choi; Shin Won Kwon; Jung Hyeon Moon; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Bae Park; Won Heo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-10-25

9.  Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Sumihisa Orita; Takao Nakajima; Kenta Konno; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Kazuki Fujimoto; Jun Sato; Yasuhiro Shiga; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Masahiro Inoue; Hideyuki Kinoshita; Masaki Norimoto; Tomotaka Umimura; Yasuchika Aoki; Junichi Nakamura; Yusuke Matsuura; Go Kubota; Yawara Eguchi; Richard A Hynes; Tsutomu Akazawa; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27

10.  Therapeutic effect of MIPPSO in the thoracolumbar vertebra fracture.

Authors:  Kewei Ren; Jilei Tang; Xuefeng Jiang; Luming Nong; Yanqing Gu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.