Literature DB >> 25302943

Emotion and persuasion: cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.

Richard E Petty1, Pablo Briñol.   

Abstract

This article addresses the multiple ways in which emotions can influence attitudes and persuasion via primary and secondary (meta-) cognition. Using the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion as a guide, we review evidence for five fundamental processes that occur at different points along the elaboration continuum. When the extent of thinking is constrained to be low, emotions influence attitudes by relatively simple processes that lead them to change in a manner consistent with the valence of the emotion. When thinking is constrained to be high, emotions can serve as arguments in favour of a proposal if they are relevant to the merits of the advocacy or they can bias thinking if the emotion precedes the message. If thinking is high and emotions become salient after thinking, they can lead people to rely or not rely on the thoughts generated either because the emotion leads people to like or dislike their thoughts (affective validation) or feel more confident or doubtful in their thoughts (cognitive validation). When thinking is unconstrained, emotions influence the extent of thinking about the persuasive communication. Although prior theories have addressed one or more of these fundamental processes, no other approach has integrated them into one framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Elaboration likelihood model; Persuasion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302943     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.967183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  11 in total

Review 1.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A Framework for Pilot Testing Health Risk Video Narratives.

Authors:  Courtney Lynam Scherr; Kelli Nam; Bianca Augusto; Monica L Kasting; Meghan Caldwell; Marie Catherine Lee; Cathy D Meade; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-04-18

3.  The influence of message framing on nocebo headaches: Findings from a randomized laboratory design.

Authors:  Suzanne G Helfer; Ben Colagiuri; Kate Faasse; Kelly S Clemens; Fawn Caplandies; Andrew L Geers
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  Affect and Cognition: Three Principles.

Authors:  Gerald L Clore; Alexander J Schiller; Adi Shaked
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-11-22

5.  Optimal linguistic expression in negotiations depends on visual appearance.

Authors:  Maki Sakamoto; Jinhwan Kwon; Hikaru Tamada; Yumi Hirahara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preferences in Information Processing, Marginalized Identity, and Non-Monogamy: Understanding Factors in Suicide-Related Behavior among Members of the Alternative Sexuality Community.

Authors:  Robert J Cramer; Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling; Andrea R Kaniuka; Corrine N Wilsey; Annelise Mennicke; Susan Wright; Erika Montanaro; Jessamyn Bowling; Kristin E Heron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Integrating Individual Factors to Construct Recognition Models of Consumer Fraud Victimization.

Authors:  Liuchang Xu; Jie Wang; Dayu Xu; Liang Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The effect of framing on attitudes towards Alzheimer's disease. A comparative study between younger and older adults.

Authors:  Fátima Cuadrado; Adoración Antolí; Bernardino Fernández-Calvo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  The Effectiveness of Narrative Versus Didactic Information Formats on Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Risk Perception, Self-Efficacy, and Information Seeking Related to Climate Change Health Risks.

Authors:  Adebanke L Adebayo; Rochelle Davidson Mhonde; Nathaniel DeNicola; Edward Maibach
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Qualitative Differences in Attribution of Mental States to Other People in Autism and Schizophrenia: What are the Tools for Differential Diagnosis?

Authors:  Monica Mazza; Maria Chiara Pino; Roberto Keller; Roberto Vagnetti; Margherita Attanasio; Angela Filocamo; Ilenia Le Donne; Francesco Masedu; Marco Valenti
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.