Literature DB >> 25302829

Bone remodeling after MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: evaluation with MR imaging, CT, Na(18)F-PET, and histopathologic examination in a swine model.

Matthew D Bucknor1, Viola Rieke, Youngho Seo, Andrew E Horvai, Randall A Hawkins, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link, Maythem Saeed.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To serially monitor bone remodeling in the swine femur after magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation with MR imaging, computed tomography (CT), sodium fluorine 18 (Na(18)F)-positron emission tomography (PET), and histopathologic examination, as a function of sonication energy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental procedures received approval from the local institutional animal care and use committee. MR imaging-guided HIFU was used to create distal and proximal ablations in the right femurs of eight pigs. The energy used at the distal target was higher (mean, 419 J; range, 390-440 J) than that used at the proximal target (mean, 324 J; range, 300-360 J). Imaging was performed before and after ablation with 3.0-T MR imaging and 64-section CT. Animals were reevaluated at 3 and 6 weeks with MR imaging (n = 8), CT (n = 8), Na(18)F-PET (n = 4), and histopathologic examination (n = 4). Three-dimensional ablation lengths were measured on contrast material-enhanced MR images, and bone remodeling in the cortex was measured on CT images.
RESULTS: Ablation sizes at MR imaging 3 and 6 weeks after MR imaging-guided HIFU ablation were similar between proximal (low-energy) and distal (high-energy) lesions (average, 8.7 × 21.9 × 16.4 mm). However, distal ablation lesions (n = 8) demonstrated evidence of subperiosteal new bone formation at CT, with a subtle focus of new ossification at 3 weeks and a larger focus of ossification at 6 weeks. New bone formation was associated with increased uptake at Na(18)F-PET in three of four animals; this was confirmed at histopathologic examination in four of four animals.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided HIFU ablation of bone may result in progressive remodeling, with both subcortical necrosis and subperiosteal new bone formation. This may be related to the use of high energies. MR imaging, CT, and PET are suitable noninvasive techniques to monitor bone remodeling after MR imaging-guided HIFU ablation. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302829      PMCID: PMC4314293          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Primary bone malignancy: effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Wenzhi Chen; Hui Zhu; Lian Zhang; Kequan Li; Haibing Su; Chengbin Jin; Kun Zhou; Jin Bai; Feng Wu; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery. Ablation of soft tissue at bone-muscle interface in a porcine model.

Authors:  D Kopelman; Y Inbar; A Hanannel; R M Pfeffer; O Dogadkin; D Freundlich; B Liberman; R Catane
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 3.  MR thermometry.

Authors:  Viola Rieke; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  MR imaging-controlled focused ultrasound ablation: a noninvasive image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen; Nathan McDannold; Clare Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of bone: evaluation of acute findings with MR and CT imaging in a swine model.

Authors:  Matthew D Bucknor; Viola Rieke; Loi Do; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for the palliation of pain in patients with bone metastases--preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  R Catane; A Beck; Y Inbar; T Rabin; N Shabshin; S Hengst; R M Pfeffer; A Hanannel; O Dogadkin; B Liberman; D Kopelman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Palliative treatment of painful bone metastases with MR imaging--guided focused ultrasound.

Authors:  David Gianfelice; Chander Gupta; Walter Kucharczyk; Patrice Bret; Deborah Havill; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Osteoid osteoma: MR-guided focused ultrasound for entirely noninvasive treatment.

Authors:  Alessandro Napoli; Marco Mastantuono; Beatrice Cavallo Marincola; Michele Anzidei; Fulvio Zaccagna; Oreste Moreschini; Roberto Passariello; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Pain palliation in patients with bone metastases using MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Boaz Liberman; David Gianfelice; Yael Inbar; Alexander Beck; Tatiana Rabin; Noga Shabshin; Gupta Chander; Suzanne Hengst; Raphael Pfeffer; Aharon Chechick; Arik Hanannel; Osnat Dogadkin; Raphael Catane
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery in musculoskeletal diseases: the hot topics.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Carlo Catalano; Ugo Albisinni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Bone remodeling following MR-guided focused ultrasound: Evaluation with HR-pQCT and FTIR.

Authors:  Matthew D Bucknor; Harsh Goel; Courtney Pasco; Andrew E Horvai; Galateia J Kazakia
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation of lumbar medial branch nerve: Feasibility and safety study in a swine model.

Authors:  Elena A Kaye; Sebastien Monette; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Majid Maybody; Stephen B Solomon; Amitabh Gulati
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  Renal ablation using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology assessment.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Roland Krug; Loi Do; Steven W Hetts; Mark W Wilson
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

5.  Long-Term Halo Follow-Up Confirms Less Invasive Treatment of Low-Grade Cartilaginous Tumors with Radiofrequency Ablation to Be Safe and Effective.

Authors:  Hendricus Nijland; Jelle Overbosch; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Thomas C Kwee; Paul C Jutte
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Correlation between uterine fibroids with various magnetic resonance imaging features and therapeutic effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Hailing Cheng; Chen Wang; Jun Tian
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Weakening or Structural Strengthening? An Evaluation of Bone Density after MRgFUS Ablation for Treatment of Benign Bone Lesions.

Authors:  Camilla de Cataldo; Federico Bruno; Stefano Necozione; Mariangela Novello; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Luigi Zugaro; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Francesco Arrigoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  In vivo measurements of medial branch nerve depth and adjacent osseous structures for ablation of facet-related back pain: Predictors for patient candidacy.

Authors:  Hannah Zwiebel; Ron Aginsky; Arik Hananel; Daniel Baldor; Michael Gofeld; Jean-Francois Aubry; Suzanne D LeBlang
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-08-07

9.  Effects of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation on bone mechanical properties and modeling.

Authors:  Sin Yuin Yeo; Andrés J Arias Moreno; Bert van Rietbergen; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Paul J van Diest; Holger Grüll
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2015-08-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.