Literature DB >> 25301850

PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database.

Zhihai Liu1, Yan Li1, Li Han1, Jie Li1, Jie Liu1, Zhixiong Zhao1, Wei Nie1, Yuchen Liu1, Renxiao Wang2.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Molecular recognition between biological macromolecules and organic small molecules plays an important role in various life processes. Both structural information and binding data of biomolecular complexes are indispensable for depicting the underlying mechanism in such an event. The PDBbind database was created to collect experimentally measured binding data for the biomolecular complexes throughout the Protein Data Bank (PDB). It thus provides the linkage between structural information and energetic properties of biomolecular complexes, which is especially desirable for computational studies or statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Since its first public release in 2004, the PDBbind database has been updated on an annual basis. The latest release (version 2013) provides experimental binding affinity data for 10,776 biomolecular complexes in PDB, including 8302 protein-ligand complexes and 2474 other types of complexes. In this article, we will describe the current methods used for compiling PDBbind and the updated status of this database. We will also review some typical applications of PDBbind published in the scientific literature.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All contents of this database are freely accessible at the PDBbind-CN Web server at http://www.pdbbind-cn.org/. CONTACT: wangrx@mail.sioc.ac.cn. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301850     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  100 in total

1.  Incorporating specificity into optimization: evaluation of SPA using CSAR 2014 and CASF 2013 benchmarks.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Yan; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures.

Authors:  Mei Qian Yau; Abigail L Emtage; Nathaniel J Y Chan; Stephen W Doughty; Jason S E Loo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Binding site matching in rational drug design: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  Misagh Naderi; Jeffrey Mitchell Lemoine; Rajiv Gandhi Govindaraj; Omar Zade Kana; Wei Pan Feinstein; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  MedusaDock 2.0: Efficient and Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking With Constraints.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Updates to Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases): Polypharmacology Tools and Their Utility in Drug Repurposing.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Jordan J Clark; Aqeel Ahmed; Zachary J Orban; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Persistent Cohomology for Data With Multicomponent Heterogeneous Information.

Authors:  Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  SIAM J Math Data Sci       Date:  2020-05-19

Review 7.  Large-Scale Prediction of Drug-Target Interaction: a Data-Centric Review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Ming Hao; Takako Takeda; Stephen H Bryant; Yanli Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  When Does Chemical Elaboration Induce a Ligand To Change Its Binding Mode?

Authors:  Shipra Malhotra; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Assessing protein-ligand interaction scoring functions with the CASF-2013 benchmark.

Authors:  Yan Li; Minyi Su; Zhihai Liu; Jie Li; Jie Liu; Li Han; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 10.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.