Jeanne L Hatcher1, Ashley M Dao2, C Blake Simpson3. 1. University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA simpsonc@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess vocal disability in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis who are managed with endoscopic surgery, comparing patients with posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) to those with subglottic or tracheal stenosis (SGS/TS). METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for laryngotracheal stenosis with voice outcomes data from 2005 to 2013 were studied. The mean Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) was compared over the study period. Of those with SGS/TS, the distance from the vocal folds to the proximal portion of the stenosis was obtained and compared to VHI-10. RESULTS: Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria. The mean VHI-10 for all patients was 14.6. Fifty percent were dysphonic (VHI-10>11). The mean VHI-10 for PGS patients was 22.4, and for SGS/TS patients, 10.9 (P=.004). Of those with PGS, 78.6% were dysphonic compared to only 36.7% of those with SGS/TS. Voice Handicap Index-10 improved from 14.1 for those with proximal stenosis to 4 for those with stenosis more than 2 cm distal to the vocal folds. CONCLUSION: Following endoscopic management of stenosis, those with PGS have poorer voice outcomes compared to those with SGS/TS. The majority of those with SGS/TS are not dysphonic. Vocal outcomes are greatest for those with stenosis beginning at least 2 cm distal to the vocal folds.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess vocal disability in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis who are managed with endoscopic surgery, comparing patients with posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) to those with subglottic or tracheal stenosis (SGS/TS). METHODS:Patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for laryngotracheal stenosis with voice outcomes data from 2005 to 2013 were studied. The mean Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) was compared over the study period. Of those with SGS/TS, the distance from the vocal folds to the proximal portion of the stenosis was obtained and compared to VHI-10. RESULTS: Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria. The mean VHI-10 for all patients was 14.6. Fifty percent were dysphonic (VHI-10>11). The mean VHI-10 for PGSpatients was 22.4, and for SGS/TS patients, 10.9 (P=.004). Of those with PGS, 78.6% were dysphonic compared to only 36.7% of those with SGS/TS. Voice Handicap Index-10 improved from 14.1 for those with proximal stenosis to 4 for those with stenosis more than 2 cm distal to the vocal folds. CONCLUSION: Following endoscopic management of stenosis, those with PGS have poorer voice outcomes compared to those with SGS/TS. The majority of those with SGS/TS are not dysphonic. Vocal outcomes are greatest for those with stenosis beginning at least 2 cm distal to the vocal folds.
Authors: Kristine Tanner; Christopher Dromey; Mark L Berardi; Lisa M Mattei; Jenny L Pierce; Jonathan J Wisco; Eric J Hunter; Marshall E Smith Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Idris Samad; Lee Akst; Selmin Karatayli-Özgürsoy; Kristine Teets; Marissa Simpson; Ashwyn Sharma; Simon R A Best; Alexander T Hillel Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Melissa M Liu; Kevin M Motz; Michael K Murphy; Linda X Yin; Dacheng Ding; Alexander Gelbard; Alexander T Hillel Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 2.970
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Yu Shyr; Lynne Berry; Alexander T Hillel; Dale C Ekbom; Eric S Edell; Jan L Kasperbauer; David G Lott; Donald T Donovan; C Gaelyn Garrett; Guri Sandhu; James J Daniero; James L Netterville; Josh S Schindler; Marshall E Smith; Paul C Bryson; Robert R Lorenz; David O Francis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692