Literature DB >> 25301544

Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment.

Phillip N Pressley1, James W Levis2, Anders Damgaard3, Morton A Barlaz2, Joseph F DeCarolis2.   

Abstract

Insights derived from life-cycle assessment of solid waste management strategies depend critically on assumptions, data, and modeling at the unit process level. Based on new primary data, a process model was developed to estimate the cost and energy use associated with material recovery facilities (MRFs), which are responsible for sorting recyclables into saleable streams and as such represent a key piece of recycling infrastructure. The model includes four modules, each with a different process flow, for separation of single-stream, dual-stream, pre-sorted recyclables, and mixed-waste. Each MRF type has a distinct combination of equipment and default input waste composition. Model results for total amortized costs from each MRF type ranged from $19.8 to $24.9 per Mg (1Mg=1 metric ton) of waste input. Electricity use ranged from 4.7 to 7.8kWh per Mg of waste input. In a single-stream MRF, equipment required for glass separation consumes 28% of total facility electricity consumption, while all other pieces of material recovery equipment consume less than 10% of total electricity. The dual-stream and mixed-waste MRFs have similar electricity consumption to a single-stream MRF. Glass separation contributes a much larger fraction of electricity consumption in a pre-sorted MRF, due to lower overall facility electricity consumption. Parametric analysis revealed that reducing separation efficiency for each piece of equipment by 25% altered total facility electricity consumption by less than 4% in each case. When model results were compared with actual data for an existing single-stream MRF, the model estimated the facility's electricity consumption within 2%. The results from this study can be integrated into LCAs of solid waste management with system boundaries that extend from the curb through final disposal.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Life-cycle assessment; Material recovery facility; Municipal solid waste; Recycling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301544     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  1 in total

1.  Recycling of Plastics in the United States: Plastic Material Flows and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycling Processes.

Authors:  Raymond L Smith; Sudhakar Takkellapati; Rachelle C Riegerix
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 8.198

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.