Literature DB >> 25301111

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) rs246079 G/A polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese population.

Jun Yin1, Yonghua Sang, Liang Zheng, Liming Wang, Luorongxin Yuan, Chao Liu, Xu Wang, Yijun Shi, Aizhong Shao, Guowen Ding, Suocheng Chen, Weifeng Tang, Haiyong Gu.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide. In addition to environmental risk factors, genetic factors might play an important role in esophageal cancer carcinogenesis. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study to evaluate the association between functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) and the development of esophageal cancer. A total of 380 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases and 380 controls were recruited for this study. The UNG rs3219218 A/G and UNG rs246079 G/A genotypes were determined using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). When the UNG rs246079 GG homozygote genotype was used as the reference group, the GA genotype was associated with a significantly decreased risk for ESCC (GA vs. GG: adjusted OR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.49-0.91, P = 0.011); the AA genotype was not associated with the risk of ESCC. In stratification analyses, a significantly decreased risk of ESCC associated with the UNG rs246079 G/A polymorphism was evident among women, younger patients and never-smokers and never-drinkers. The UNG rs3219218 A/G polymorphism was not associated with the risk for ESCC. These findings indicated that UNG rs246079 G/A might contribute to a decreased risk of ESCC in specific populations. Because of the limited sample size, further studies including a larger and more diverse population, as well as tissue-specific biological characterization, are required to confirm the current findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301111     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0272-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  19 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Deborah E Barnes; Tomas Lindahl
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Polymorphisms in uracil-processing genes, but not one-carbon nutrients, are associated with altered DNA uracil concentrations in an urban Puerto Rican population.

Authors:  Aurelie Chanson; Laurence D Parnell; Eric D Ciappio; Zhenhua Liu; Jimmy W Crott; Katherine L Tucker; Joel B Mason
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Variation in DNA repair is a factor in cancer susceptibility: a paradigm for the promises and perils of individual and population risk estimation?

Authors:  H W Mohrenweiser; I M Jones
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-05-25       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice.

Authors:  Cristina Rada; Gareth T Williams; Hilde Nilsen; Deborah E Barnes; Tomas Lindahl; Michael S Neuberger
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Genetic polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene UNG are associated with the susceptibility of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sui-Foon Lo; Lei Wan; Chung-Ming Huang; Hsiu-Chen Lin; Shih-Yin Chen; Su-Ching Liu; Fuu-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Association of autoantibodies with Ku and DNA repair proteins in connective tissue diseases.

Authors:  C Schild-Poulter; A Su; A Shih; O P Kelly; M J Fritzler; R Goldstein; R J G Haché
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Gene-targeted mice lacking the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase develop B-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Hilde Nilsen; Gordon Stamp; Sonja Andersen; Geza Hrivnak; Hans E Krokan; Tomas Lindahl; Deborah E Barnes
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  DNA repair genotype and lung cancer risk in the beta-carotene and retinol efficacy trial.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doherty; Lori C Sakoda; Melissa M Loomis; Matt J Barnett; Liberto Julianto; Mark D Thornquist; Marian L Neuhouser; Noel S Weiss; Gary E Goodman; Chu Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2013-03-18

Review 10.  Novel aspects of macromolecular repair and relationship to human disease.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Bodil Kavli; Geir Slupphaug
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  2 in total

1.  A DNA Damage Repair Gene Signature Associated With Immunotherapy Response and Clinical Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Linjie Peng; Jiaming Liang; Qi Wang; Guodong Chen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Investigation of base excision repair gene variants in late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Tugce Ertuzun; Asli Semerci; Mehmet Emin Cakir; Aysegul Ekmekcioglu; Mehmet Oguz Gok; Daniela T Soltys; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; Ugur Sezerman; Meltem Muftuoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.