Keun Young Park1, Byung Moon Kim2, Dong Joon Kim1, Dong Ik Kim1, Ji Hoe Heo1, Hyo Suk Nam1, Young Dae Kim1, Dongbeom Song1. 1. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (K.Y.P.), Radiology (B.M.K., D.J.K., D.I.K.), and Neurology (J.H.H., H.S.N., Y.D.K., D.S.), Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 2. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (K.Y.P.), Radiology (B.M.K., D.J.K., D.I.K.), and Neurology (J.H.H., H.S.N., Y.D.K., D.S.), Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. bmoon21@hanmail.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about high-signal lesions in magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI [+]) after stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, distribution, risk factors, and clinical implications of DWI (+) after intracranial stenting. METHODS: A total of 123 patients (male:female=88:35, mean age, 64.1 years) with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (mean stenosis, 76.1±7.7%) underwent both stenting and poststenting DWI. The incidence, distribution (embolic-alone versus stenosis-associated perforator/mixed), and risk factors of DWI (+) and its relationship with symptomatic ischemic complications (SIC, including stroke or transient ischemic attack) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (35.0%) had DWI (+). Middle cerebral artery, smaller distal parent artery, and treatment-related dissection were independent risk factors for DWI (+) (P<0.05). SIC occurred in 4 patients (3.3%), all of whom had DWI (+). Of the patients with DWI (+), neither the number nor the volume of DWI (+) differed significantly between SIC and asymptomatic patients: median number/patient, 3.5 (range, 2-11) versus 2.0 (range, 1-11) and median volume/patient, 329.8 mm(3) (range, 76-883.5 mm(3)) versus 119.5 mm(3) (range, 32.5-873.0 mm(3)). However, SIC occurred more frequently in the stenosis-associated perforator/mixed type (3/11, 27.3%) than in the embolic-alone type (1/32, 3.1%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DWI (+) after intracranial stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis was 35.0%. Middle cerebral artery, smaller distal parent artery, and treatment-related dissection were independent risk factors for DWI (+). SIC occurred more frequently in the stenosis-associated perforator/mixed type than in the embolic-alone type.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about high-signal lesions in magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI [+]) after stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, distribution, risk factors, and clinical implications of DWI (+) after intracranial stenting. METHODS: A total of 123 patients (male:female=88:35, mean age, 64.1 years) with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (mean stenosis, 76.1±7.7%) underwent both stenting and poststenting DWI. The incidence, distribution (embolic-alone versus stenosis-associated perforator/mixed), and risk factors of DWI (+) and its relationship with symptomatic ischemic complications (SIC, including stroke or transient ischemic attack) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (35.0%) had DWI (+). Middle cerebral artery, smaller distal parent artery, and treatment-related dissection were independent risk factors for DWI (+) (P<0.05). SIC occurred in 4 patients (3.3%), all of whom had DWI (+). Of the patients with DWI (+), neither the number nor the volume of DWI (+) differed significantly between SIC and asymptomatic patients: median number/patient, 3.5 (range, 2-11) versus 2.0 (range, 1-11) and median volume/patient, 329.8 mm(3) (range, 76-883.5 mm(3)) versus 119.5 mm(3) (range, 32.5-873.0 mm(3)). However, SIC occurred more frequently in the stenosis-associated perforator/mixed type (3/11, 27.3%) than in the embolic-alone type (1/32, 3.1%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DWI (+) after intracranial stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis was 35.0%. Middle cerebral artery, smaller distal parent artery, and treatment-related dissection were independent risk factors for DWI (+). SIC occurred more frequently in the stenosis-associated perforator/mixed type than in the embolic-alone type.
Authors: Hannes Nordmeyer; René Chapot; Ayhan Aycil; Christian P Stracke; Marta Wallocha; M Jeffrie Hadisurya; Markus Heddier; Patrick Haage; Ralph Weber Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.003