Literature DB >> 25300534

Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis treated with medical therapy alone: temporal trends and implications for risk assessment and the design of future studies.

Nira Hadar1, Gowri Raman, Denish Moorthy, Thomas F O'Donnell, David E Thaler, Edward Feldmann, Joseph Lau, Georgios D Kitsios, Issa J Dahabreh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of adverse clinical outcomes among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis receiving medical therapy alone can be used to guide clinical decision-making and to inform future research. We aimed to investigate temporal changes in the incidence rate of clinical outcomes among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis receiving medical therapy alone and to explore the implications of these changes for the design of future comparative studies.
SUMMARY: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, US Food and Drug Administration documents, and reference lists of included studies (last search: December 31, 2012). We selected prospective cohort studies of medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and we extracted information on study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes. We performed meta-analyses to estimate summary incidence rates, meta-regressions to assess trends over time, and simulations to explore sample size requirements for the design of future studies comparing new treatments against medical therapy. The main outcomes of interest were ipsilateral stroke, any stroke, cardiovascular death, death, and myocardial infarction. We identified 41 studies of medical therapy for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (last recruitment year: 1978-2009). The summary incidence rate of ipsilateral carotid territory stroke (25 studies) was 1.7 per 100 person-years. This incidence rate was significantly lower in recent studies (last recruitment year from 2000 onwards) as compared to studies that ended recruitment earlier (1.0 vs. 2.3 events per 100 person-years; p < 0.001). The incidence rates of any territory stroke (17 studies), cardiovascular death (6 studies), death (13 studies), and myocardial infarction (5 studies) were 2.7, 4.1, 4.6, and 1.8 per 100 person-years, respectively. Simulations showed that future studies would need to enroll large numbers of patients with a relatively high incidence rate under medical therapy, and evaluate interventions with large effect sizes, to have adequate power to reliably detect treatment effects. KEY MESSAGES: Improved prognosis under medical therapy alone has narrowed the potential range of risk reduction attainable with new treatments for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Future comparative studies will need to enroll large numbers of patients to assess treatment effectiveness.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25300534     DOI: 10.1159/000365206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  17 in total

1.  Detection of Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using Source Data from MR and CT Angiography: A Correlative Study.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Hediyeh Baradaran; Edward E Mtui; Hooman Kamel; Ankur Pandya; Ashley Giambrone; Costantino Iadecola; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  [Treatment options for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis : Asymptomatic Carotid Trial (ACT I) and Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST)].

Authors:  H-C Diener; S Nitschmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Carotid Stenting in Neuroradiology : A Short Journey from the Past to Current Debates.

Authors:  Joachim Berkefeld; Marlies Wagner; Richard du Mesnil
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Carotid atherosclerotic plaque instability and cognition determined by ultrasound-measured plaque strain in asymptomatic patients with significant stenosis.

Authors:  Robert J Dempsey; Tomy Varghese; Daren C Jackson; Xiao Wang; Nirvedh H Meshram; Carol C Mitchell; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson; Sara E Berman; Stephanie M Wilbrand
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Reinier A R Herings; Kirsten Dansey; Johanna A A Damen; Jacoba P Greving; Marc L Schermerhorn; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Ultrasound diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis and occlusion.

Authors:  Hidehiro Takekawa; Daisuke Tsukui; Saro Kobayasi; Keisuke Suzuki; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Reassembling Evidence for Treatment in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Hyung Oh Kim; Weon Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 8.  Trials and Frontiers in Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.

Authors:  Douglas W Jones; Thomas G Brott; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jacob H Bagley; Ryan Priest
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Andreas Kühnl; Joachim Berkefeld; Holger Lawall; Martin Storck; Dirk Sander
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.