Literature DB >> 25300239

Interaction of age and foam types used in Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB).

Nithinun Chaikeeree1, Vitoon Saengsirisuwan2, Butsara Chinsongkram3, Rumpa Boonsinsukh4.   

Abstract

Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB) is a simplified method for investigating the organization of multiple sensory inputs in postural control. The accuracy of the test is based partly on the foam types. Several types of foam are available, but the validity of these foams on CTSIB and the interaction of age and foam types have not been addressed. In this study, postural sway of young (21.6 ± 3.3 years) and older (53.2 ± 4.9 years) participants were assessed while standing on four types of foam: NeuroCom(®), sponge, Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA), and memory foams. Postural sway during stance on solid floor and foams with eyes open and eyes closed were quantified by root-mean-square (RMS) of center of body mass acceleration in the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions using the acceleration-based OPAL system. Physical properties of foams including density, Young's modulus, and indentation force deflection (IFD) were determined. Results demonstrated that RMS-ML in older subjects was larger than younger subjects (p ≤ 0.001), especially when standing on the NeuroCom(®) foam with eyes closed (p = 0.001). There was an interaction of age and foam types as larger differences in RMS-ML were observed between young and older subjects on the NeuroCom(®) and EVA foams, but not the other foams. The sway characteristics were largest when standing on the NeuroCom(®) foam which demonstrated high density and high compliance. Our findings suggested the importance of foam selection in CTSIB on accurate postural sway analysis and balance assessment.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance assessment; Compliant surface; Sensory integration; Somatosensation; Trunk acceleration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25300239     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  9 in total

1.  Walking on a compliant surface does not enhance kinematic gait asymmetries after unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joakim Bjerke; Fredrik Öhberg; Kjell G Nilsson; Ann-Katrin Stensdotter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Normative data for static balance testing in healthy individuals using open source computerized posturography.

Authors:  Esther Domènech-Vadillo; Gabriel Aguilera-Aguilera; Carmen Sánchez-Blanco; Ángel Batuecas-Caletrio; Carlos Guajardo; Nicolás Pérez; Gabriel Trinidad-Ruiz; Carlos Gimeno; Julio Rama; Marcos Rossi-Izquierdo; Elena San-Roman-Rodriguez; Berta Patiño-Castiñeira; Juan Manuel Espinosa-Sanchez; Eusebi Matiñó; Rafael Barona; Claudio Krstulovic; Jesús Benitez-Rosario; Elvira Santandreu; Francisco Carlos Zuma E Maia; María Guadalupe Álvarez-Morujo de Sande; Ariadna Valldeperes; Jorge Rey-Martínez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Differences in Responses on the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance on Medium Firm and Medium Density Foam in Healthy Controls and Patients with Vestibular Disorders.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2020-04-14

4.  Identifying Individuals Who Currently Report Feelings of Anxiety Using Walking Gait and Quiet Balance: An Exploratory Study Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Maggie Stark; Haikun Huang; Lap-Fai Yu; Rebecca Martin; Ryan McCarthy; Emily Locke; Chelsea Yager; Ahmed Ali Torad; Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry; Mostafa Ali Elwan; Matthew Lee Smith; Dylan Bradley; Ali Boolani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  The effect of the type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) on the accuracy in identifying older adults with fall history.

Authors:  Rumpa Boonsinsukh; Bodin Khumnonchai; Vitoon Saengsirisuwan; Nithinun Chaikeeree
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2020-07-25

Review 6.  A review on screening tests for vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Fall- and BBS-related differences in muscle strength and postural balance of the elderly.

Authors:  Jin-Seung Choi; Dong-Won Kang; Jeong-Woo Seo; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Seung-Tae Yang; Gye-Rae Tack
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-09-29

8.  Introduction of Fall Risk Assessment (FRA) System and Cross-Sectional Validation Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Woo-Chul Park; Miji Kim; Sunyoung Kim; Jinho Yoo; Byung Sung Kim; Jinmann Chon; Su Jin Jeong; Chang Won Won
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  Comparison of postural sway depending on balance pad type.

Authors:  DongGeon Lee; HaNa Kim; HyunJi An; JiEun Jang; SoungKyun Hong; SunHye Jung; Kyeongbong Lee; Myong-Ryol Choi; Kyung-Hee Lee; GyuChang Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.