| Literature DB >> 25299610 |
Yoann Crabol1, Sylvain Poiree2, Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux3, Christophe Maunoury4, Stéphane Barete5, Valérie Zeller6, Cédric Arvieux7, Samuel Pineau8, Karima Amazzough1, Marc Lecuit9, Fanny Lanternier1, Olivier Lortholary10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal management of eumycetoma, a severely debilitating chronic progressive fungal infection of skin, disseminating to bone and viscera, remains challenging. Especially, optimal antifungal treatment and duration are ill defined. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25299610 PMCID: PMC4191942 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Patients and eumycetoma characteristics at diagnosis.
| Patient Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|
| Mali | Martinique | Senegal | Senegal | Tchad | Mali | Senegal | Brazil | Mauritania | Mayotte | Togo | |
|
| M/26 | M/41 | M/29 | M/31 | M/19 | M/35 | M/49 | M/18 | M/10 | M/18 | M/56 | |
|
| Mali | Martinique | Senegal | Senegal | Tchad | Mali | Senegal | Angola | Senegal | NA | Togo | |
|
| Malleolar Left Foot | Malleolar Right Foot | Top of Right Foot | Top of Right Foot | Right lumbar Back | Right Knee | Internal Right Foot | Top Left Foot | Top Left Foot | Top Left Foot | Right ankle | |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| SB | SMBJ | SMBJ | SB | SBMNV | SB | S | SM | SB | SMBJ | SBJ | |
|
| Foot bone, tibia | Foot bone, tibia | Foot bones | Foot bones | Diaphragm, right lung, kidney and psoas | Femur | Foot bones | Foot bones | Foot bone, tibia,fibula | |||
|
| 4,2 | NP | 15,2 | NP | 15 | NP | NP | NP | 4,9 | 6,6 | 1 focus | |
|
| 443 | 305 | 500 | NP | 254 | 80 | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | |
|
| Phaeohyphomycete |
| Phaeohyphomycete |
|
|
| Coelomycete |
|
|
| Coelomycete | |
|
| Black | Black | Black | White | Black | Black | Black | White | Black | White | Black | |
|
| 120 | 268 | 50 | 156 | 36 | 7 | 58 | 318 | 36 | 60 | 7 | |
|
| No | Erysipelas | No | No | Lung Abscess | No | No | No | Erysipelas | No | No | |
|
| No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
B: Bone; J: joint; M: Male; M: muscle; N: node; NA: Not available; NP: Not Performed; S: Skin; SF: Secondary Failure; V: visceral; VCZ: voriconazole.
Treatment and outcome characteristics of eleven patients with eumycetoma.
| Patient Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|
| KTZ 0.5 PF | None | KTZ 72 SF FCZ 8 PF KTZ 22 R | TBF 3 NA ITZ 6 NA | ITZ 6 R | KTZ 0.3 R | None | None | None | None | None | |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| VCZ | PCZ | VCZ | VCZ/PCZ | VCZ/PCZ | PCZ | VCZ | VCZ | PCZ | VCZ | VCZ | |
|
| 9 | 70 | 9 | 24 | 40 | 22,5 | 30 | 35 | 18,5 | 18 | 9 | |
|
| No | No | No | No | TBF | TBF | No | No | FC | TBF | No | |
|
| Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | |
|
|
| 0.25/0.125 | NA/NA | NA/NA | NA/NA | NA/NA | 0.014/0.014 | 4/8 | NA/NA | 8/NA | 8/8 | |
|
| 1/0 | 1/0 | 4/0 | 0/0 | 3/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 3/2 | 1/0 | 0/1 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 120 | 12 | 50 | 0 | 7 | 144 | 120 | 60 | 7 | |||
|
| 414 | 267 | 515 | 204 | 119 | 65 | 63 | 330 | 290 | 114 | 9 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Major | Major | Major | Minor | Stable | Major | Major | Major | Major | Minor | Major | |
|
| Stable | Major | Minor | NP | Worse | Major | Major | Minor | Major | Minor | NP | |
|
| Minor | Major | Minor | NP | Worse | Major | Major | Minor | Major | NP | NP | |
|
| Stable (472) | Major (<80) | Stable (480) | 237 (post relapse) | Worse (>500) | Major(<80) | NP | ? (123) | NP | 390 (post relapse) | NP | |
|
| Ongoing | 10 | Ongoing | 132 | Ongoing | Ongoing | 72 | Ongoing | 72 | 68 | 83 | |
|
| No | Yes, 8 | No | No | Yes, 11 | No |
B: Bone involvement; CPK: creatinine phosphokinase; CR: Complete Response; D: drainage; I: inflammation; ITZ: itraconazole; J: Joint involvement; KTZ: ketoconazole; M: Muscle involvement; Node involvement; P: pain; PCZ: posaconazole; PF: Primary failure; PR: Partial Response; R: relapse; S: soft tissue involvement; SUV: Standard Uptake Value; V: Visceral involvement; VCZ: voriconazole.
* Patient 8 only had one post last generation triazole treatment dosage of BG so that evolution couldn’t be assessed.
Figure 1Organ involvement in patients 4 and 5.
Lumbar tumefaction with draining sinuses (A). Black grains drainage (B). Paraspinal abdominal eumycetoma extension on abdomen MRI LAVA sequence (C) and lung extension on lung CT scanner (D) in patient 5. Clinical (E) second and third metatarsal destruction on 3D reconstruction CT (F) of foot. Foot mycetoma aspect on Axial T1 Fat Sat Gadolinium MRI (G) and PET/CT (H) in patient 4.
Figure 2Major MRI Response in patient 2.
Major MRI response in Patient 2 with disappearance of periachillean tissular infiltration and of talus bone edema. Slight talus contrast enhancement persistance on T1 Gado Fat Sat sequence.
Figure 3Major MRI and PET/CT responses in Patient 9.
Left foot T1 Fat Sat Gadolinium enhanced MRI (A): Disappearance of periachillean tissular infiltration with the dot in the circle pattern, talus bone edema disappearance and slight talus contrast enhancement persistence. Disappearance of talus and tarsal hypermetabolism on left foot PET/CT (B).