Literature DB >> 25299502

Left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug: Rationale for a higher degree of device oversizing at implantation.

Joerg Neuzner1, Thomas Dietze, Robert Paliege, Michael Möller, Giovanni Saeed, Rainer Gradaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, the correct sizing of the implantable devices is crucial. Data on the time-dependent changes in the shape and positioning of LAA occlusion devices are missing. We analyzed the results of 33 consecutive patients after implantation of an Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP) LAA closure device to get more information on the optimal device sizing during implantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients were enrolled in this observational study. ACP implantation was guided by fluoroscopy and three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3-D TEE). Device sizing was based on the largest measured diameter of the intended landing zone adding 2-4 mm of device oversizing. Fluoroscopies were performed at 1 day after, and after 3 months, control 3-D TEE was performed 3 months after implantation. The stability of device positioning and shape was matched with the results of 3-D TEE. Patients' mean age was 70.2 ± 8 years; mean CHA2DS2VASc score was 3.8 ± 1.1. According to the manufacture's classification, the post-implant degree of compression of the device-lobe was classified in three categories 1) undercompression "square-like shape" (1 patient); 2) optimal compression "tire-like shape" (20 patients), 3) overcompression "strawberry-like shape" (12 patients). Changes in the degree of device compression by more than one classification class occurred in 18/33 of our patients. A complete loss of device compression ("square-like shape") was observed in 9 patients. Despite the changes in device compression, a complete closure of the LAA was achieved in 32/33 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a temporal change in shape and positioning of the ACP within 3 months after implantation. A late decompression of the ACP lobe was observed in 61% of our patients, leading to a complete loss in device compression in 27%. This observation may be the rationale for a higher degree of ACP oversizing during implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25299502     DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  4 in total

1.  Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Witold Streb; Katarzyna Mitręga; Tomasz Podolecki; Magdalena Szymała; Anna Leopold-Jadczyk; Tomasz Kukulski; Zbigniew Kalarus
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Predicting Peri-Device Leakage of Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure Using Novel Three-Dimensional Geometric CT Analysis.

Authors:  Hyemoon Chung; Byunghwan Jeon; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dongjin Han; Hackjoon Shim; In Jeong Cho; Chi Young Shim; Geu-Ru Hong; Jung-Sun Kim; Yangsoo Jang; Namsik Chung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-12-30

3.  A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation.

Authors:  Ali Hamadanchi; Shun Ijuin; Franz Haertel; Tarek Bekfani; Julian Westphal; Marcus Franz; Sven Moebius-Winkler; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  --LAA Occluder View for post-implantation Evaluation (LOVE)--standardized imaging proposal evaluating implanted left atrial appendage occlusion devices by cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael Behnes; Ibrahim Akin; Benjamin Sartorius; Christian Fastner; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Martin Borggrefe; Holger Haubenreisser; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.