K Tran1, D Morra2, V Lo1, S Quan2, R Wu3. 1. Centre for Innovation in Complex Care, University Health Network , Toronto, Canada. 2. Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners , Mississauga, Canada. 3. Centre for Innovation in Complex Care, University Health Network , Toronto, Canada ; Division of General Internal Medicine, University Health Network , Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the uses of institutional and personal smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards and highlight potential consequences from their use. METHODS: A mixed methods study consisting of both quantitative and qualitative research methods was conducted in General Internal Medicine wards across four academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Participants included medical students, residents, attending physicians and allied health professionals. Data collection consisted of work shadowing observations, semi-structured interviews and surveys. RESULTS: Personal smartphones were used for both clinical communication and non-work-related activities. Clinicians used their personal devices to communicate with their medical teams and with other medical specialties and healthcare professionals. Participants understood the risks associated with communicating confidential health information via their personal smartphones, but appear to favor efficiency over privacy issues. From survey responses, 9 of 23 residents (39%) reported using their personal cell phones to email or text patient information that may have contained patient identifiers. Although some residents were observed using their personal smartphones for non-work-related activities, personal use was infrequent and most residents did not engage in this activity. CONCLUSION: Clinicians are using personal smartphones for work-related purposes on the wards. With the increasing popularity of smartphone devices, it is anticipated that an increasing number of clinicians will use their personal smartphones for clinical work. This trend poses risks to the secure transfer of confidential personal health information and may lead to increased distractions for clinicians.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the uses of institutional and personal smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards and highlight potential consequences from their use. METHODS: A mixed methods study consisting of both quantitative and qualitative research methods was conducted in General Internal Medicine wards across four academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Participants included medical students, residents, attending physicians and allied health professionals. Data collection consisted of work shadowing observations, semi-structured interviews and surveys. RESULTS: Personal smartphones were used for both clinical communication and non-work-related activities. Clinicians used their personal devices to communicate with their medical teams and with other medical specialties and healthcare professionals. Participants understood the risks associated with communicating confidential health information via their personal smartphones, but appear to favor efficiency over privacy issues. From survey responses, 9 of 23 residents (39%) reported using their personal cell phones to email or text patient information that may have contained patient identifiers. Although some residents were observed using their personal smartphones for non-work-related activities, personal use was infrequent and most residents did not engage in this activity. CONCLUSION: Clinicians are using personal smartphones for work-related purposes on the wards. With the increasing popularity of smartphone devices, it is anticipated that an increasing number of clinicians will use their personal smartphones for clinical work. This trend poses risks to the secure transfer of confidential personal health information and may lead to increased distractions for clinicians.
Authors: Robert C Wu; Dante Morra; Sherman Quan; Sannie Lai; Samira Zanjani; Howard Abrams; Peter G Rossos Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Robert C Wu; Vivian Lo; Dante Morra; Brian M Wong; Robert Sargeant; Ken Locke; Rodrigo Cavalcanti; Sherman D Quan; Peter Rossos; Kim Tran; Mark Cheung Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Xinran Liu; Paul R Sutton; Rory McKenna; Mika N Sinanan; B Jane Fellner; Michael G Leu; Cris Ewell Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Guy Martin; Ankur Khajuria; Sonal Arora; Dominic King; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Corey D Stein; Xiang Xiao; Steven Levine; Titus K L Schleyer; Harry Hochheiser; Thankam P Thyvalikakath Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Kerry Hwang; Sue Williams; Emiliano Zucchi; Terence W H Chong; Monita Mascitti-Meuter; Dina LoGiudice; Anita M Y Goh; Anita Panayiotou; Frances Batchelor Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2021-10-26
Authors: Laura Nichols; Dubert Guerrero; Devendranath Mannuru; Marc D Basson; Abe E Sahmoun; Dinesh Bande Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 3.263