Literature DB >> 25298815

Diabetes and hypertension quality measurement in four safety-net sites: lessons learned after implementation of the same commercial electronic health record.

R Benkert1, P Dennehy2, J White3, A Hamilton4, C Tanner3, J M Pohl5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this new era after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, the literature on lessons learned with electronic health record (EHR) implementation needs to be revisited.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to describe what implementation of a commercially available EHR with built-in quality query algorithms showed us about our care for diabetes and hypertension populations in four safety net clinics, specifically feasibility of data retrieval, measurements over time, quality of data, and how our teams used this data.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2008 to October 2012 in four safety-net clinics located in the Midwest and Western United States. A data warehouse that stores data from across the U.S was utilized for data extraction from patients with diabetes or hypertension diagnoses and at least two office visits per year. Standard quality measures were collected over a period of two to four years. All sites were engaged in a partnership model with the IT staff and a shared learning process to enhance the use of the quality metrics.
RESULTS: While use of the algorithms was feasible across sites, challenges occurred when attempting to use the query results for research purposes. There was wide variation of both process and outcome results by individual centers. Composite calculations balanced out the differences seen in the individual measures. Despite using consistent quality definitions, the differences across centers had an impact on numerators and denominators. All sites agreed to a partnership model of EHR implementation, and each center utilized the available resources of the partnership for Center-specific quality initiatives.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a shared EHR, a Regional Extension Center-like partnership model, and similar quality query algorithms allowed safety-net clinics to benchmark and improve the quality of care across differing patient populations and health care delivery models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records and systems; patient with chronic illness or special needs; performance improvement; safety net clinic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25298815      PMCID: PMC4187092          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  27 in total

1.  A unique set of interactions: the MSU sustained partnership model of nurse practitioner primary care.

Authors:  Katherine Dontje; William Corser; Grace Kreulen; Anne Teitelman
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2004-02

2.  Quality of care in nurse-managed health centers.

Authors:  Violet H Barkauskas; Joanne M Pohl; Clare Tanner; Tiffiani J M Onifade; Bonnie Pilon
Journal:  Nurs Adm Q       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

3.  Crossing the evidence chasm: building evidence bridges from process changes to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  David C Kendrick; Davis Bu; Eric Pan; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Interpreting health outcomes.

Authors:  H T Davies; I K Crombie
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 5.  The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Abigail E Wilkes; Andrew M Davis; Monica E Peek; Elbert S Huang; Douglas S Bell; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Inside the health disparities collaboratives: a detailed exploration of quality improvement at community health centers.

Authors:  Ellie Grossman; Thomas Keegan; Adam L Lessler; Mary Huong Ly; Lynn Huynh; A James O'Malley; Edward Guadagnoli; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter?

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Peter J Cunningham
Journal:  Res Brief       Date:  2008-10

9.  Do financial incentives for delivering health promotion counselling work? Analysis of smoking cessation activities stimulated by the quality and outcomes framework.

Authors:  Tim Coleman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Lewis Carpenter; Hayley Dolan; Paulina Bravo; Mala Mann; Frances Bunn; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Kannan; Jason S Fish; Jacqueline M Mutz; Angela R Carrington; Ki Lai; Lisa S Davis; Josh E Youngblood; Mark R Rauschuber; Kathryn A Flores; Evan J Sara; Deepa G Bhat; DuWayne L Willett
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Utility of an Electronic Health Record Report to Identify Patients with Delays in Testing for Poorly Controlled Diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica L Schwartz; Daisy Duan; Nisa M Maruthur; Samantha I Pitts
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2022-04-02

Review 3.  The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Anna Stein; Heather Thomas; Harmander Kaur
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  David A Dorr; Christopher D'Autremont; Christie Pizzimenti; Nicole Weiskopf; Robert Rope; Steven Kassakian; Joshua E Richardson; Rob McClure; Floyd Eisenberg
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.762

5.  2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.

Authors:  Joni Beck; Deborah A Greenwood; Lori Blanton; Sandra T Bollinger; Marcene K Butcher; Jo Ellen Condon; Marjorie Cypress; Priscilla Faulkner; Amy Hess Fischl; Theresa Francis; Leslie E Kolb; Jodi M Lavin-Tompkins; Janice MacLeod; Melinda Maryniuk; Carolé Mensing; Eric A Orzeck; David D Pope; Jodi L Pulizzi; Ardis A Reed; Andrew S Rhinehart; Linda Siminerio; Jing Wang
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2017-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.