| Literature DB >> 25298760 |
Mohamed A Riswan Ahamed1, Raja S Azarudeen2, N Mujafar Kani3.
Abstract
Terpolymer ofEntities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25298760 PMCID: PMC4179946 DOI: 10.1155/2014/764085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1Reaction route of the BEF terpolymer ligand.
Scheme 2Reaction route of the BEF metal complexes.
Physicochemical and analytical data.
| Compound | Empirical formula of the repeating unit | Formula mass | Elemental analysis (%) | Λ (Ω−1 cm2 mol−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found (calc.) | ||||||||
| C | H | N | S | M | ||||
| BEF ligand | C11H13N5O2S | 279.36 | 47.09 (47.29) | 4.16 (4.35) | 25.21 (25.49) | 11.20 (11.39) | — | — |
| BEF–Cu | C22H26N10O4S2Cu | 658.23 | 40.71 (40.92) | 4.39 (4.62) | 21.74 (21.94) | 9.19 (9.27) | 9.31 (9.62) | 132.05 |
| BEF–Ni | C22H26N10O4S2Ni | 653.34 | 40.25 (40.37) | 4.47 (4.79) | 21.29 (21.46) | 9.62 (9.83) | 9.26 (9.45) | 98.37 |
| BEF–Zn | C22H26N10O4S2Zn | 660.10 | 40.23 (40.52) | 4.23 (4.45) | 21.38 (21.53) | 9.12 (9.29) | 9.41 (9.70) | 113.29 |
C: carbon, H: hydrogen, N: nitrogen, S: sulphur, and M: metal ion.
Figure 1FTIR spectra of (a) BEF, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
FTIR data.
| Compound | Observed frequencies (cm−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEF ligand | BEF–Cu | BEF–Ni | BEF–Zn | |
|
| 3455−3297 | 3408–3296 | 3348–3295 | 3345–3280 |
|
| 1532 | 1527 | 1526 | 1521 |
| CH (stretching) | 2731 | 2697 | 2712 | 2725 |
|
| 3078–2936 | 3093–2912 | 3098–2932 | 3087–2945 |
|
| 1450 | 1448 | 1449 | 1446 |
| 2,6,8-tri substitution (benzothiazole) | 1296−825 | 1298–825 | 1293–827 | 1292–825 |
|
| — | 432 | 433 | 433 |
|
| 1505–1518 | 1503–1576 | 1524–1575 | 1513–1583 |
|
| 1540 | 1590 | 1586 | 1580 |
|
| 740 | 753 | 763 | 748 |
Figure 2Electronic spectra of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
UV-Visible, ESR data, and magnetic moments.
| Compound | Transitions (cm−1) | Assignments | Geometry | ESR | Magnetic moment (B.M) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gII | g⊥ | |||||
| BEF | 260 nm |
| — | — | — | — |
| 370 nm |
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| BEF–Cu | 14295 |
1
| Octahedral | 2.21 | 2.11 | 1.85 |
| 16465 |
1
| |||||
| 24580 | Charge transfer | |||||
|
| ||||||
| BEF–Ni | 12474 |
3
| Octahedral | — | — | 3.05 |
| 14642 |
3
| |||||
| 24370 |
3
| |||||
|
| ||||||
| BEF–Zn | — | — | Octahedral | — | — | Diamagnetic |
Figure 3ESR spectra of BEF–Cu complex.
Figure 41H-NMR spectra of (a) BEF ligand and (b) BEF–Zn.
Figure 513C-NMR spectra of (a) BEF ligand and (b) BEF–Zn.
Figure 6Proposed geometry of BEF metal complexes.
Figure 7SEM images of (a) and (b) BEF ligand, (c) BEF–Cu, (d) BEF–Ni, and (e) BEF–Zn.
Figure 8XRD patterns of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
Figure 9TGA of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
TGA data for thermal stability.
| Compound | Percentage of weight loss at various temperatures |
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 (°C) | |||
| BEF ligand | 01.53 | 03.65 | 44.14 | 62.36 | 67.18 | 71.40 | 82.24 | 94.42 | 310 | 825 |
| BEF−Cu | 01.94 | 14.32 | 31.80 | 43.01 | 49.96 | 55.49 | 66.86 | 81.22 | 500 | 860 |
| BEF−Ni | 08.93 | 16.60 | 37.35 | 49.35 | 64.60 | 87.67 | — | — | 405 | 650 |
| BEF−Zn | 14.64 | 22.62 | 38.33 | 46.16 | 57.26 | 64.92 | 76.14 | 91.29 | 425 | 830 |
*Temperature of 50% weight loss; ∗∗maximum decomposition temperature.
Figure 10Sharp-Wentworth plots of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
Figure 11Freeman-Carroll plots (n) of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
Figure 12Freeman-Carroll plots (E ) of (a) BEF ligand, (b) BEF–Cu, (c) BEF–Ni, and (d) BEF–Zn.
Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters data.
| Compound |
Activation energy ( | Entropy change (Δ |
Free energy change (Δ |
Frequency factor ( |
Apparent entropy ( |
Order of reaction ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∗SW | ∗∗FC | ||||||
| BEF ligand | 9.52 | 10.39 | −158.11 | 59.40 | 1310 | −22.95 | 0.90 |
| BEF−Cu | 12.97 | 13.67 | −154.25 | 90.79 | 1205 | −23.31 | 1.04 |
| BEF−Ni | 6.93 | 4.60 | −162.90 | 70.57 | 1537 | −22.94 | 0.93 |
| BEF−Zn | 11.08 | 12.13 | −160.01 | 80.13 | 1243 | −23.18 | 1.02 |
*SW: Sharp-Wentworth; ∗∗FC: Freeman-Carroll.
Activation energies calculated by Phadnis-Deshpande method.
| Reaction mechanism model | Energy of activation ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEF ligand | BEF−Cu | BEF−Ni | BEF−Zn | |
| Power law | 6.0932 | 6.2642 | 5.9691 | 5.4312 |
| Power law |
|
| 11.9382 |
|
| Phase boundary (contracting sphere) | 1.6497 | 1.6816 | 1.6174 | 1.5009 |
| Phase boundary (contracting cylinder) | 2.5894 | 2.6436 | 2.5383 | 2.3466 |
| Nucleation and nuclei growth | 1.2135 | 1.3830 | 1.1756 | 0.7447 |
| Nucleation and nuclei growth | 0.8090 | 0.9220 | 0.7837 | 0.4964 |
| Nucleation and nuclei growth | 0.6067 | 0.6915 | 0.5878 | 0.3723 |
| Valensi, 2-dimensional diffusion | 16.8354 | 17.1926 | 16.5034 | 15.2695 |
| Jander, 3-dimensional diffusion | 3.2995 | 3.3632 | 3.2349 | 3.0018 |
| Brounshtein-Ginstling, 3-dimensional diffusion | 5.6520 | 5.5015 |
| 5.7981 |
The values indicated in bold are closest to the E value estimated by FC and SW methods.
Antibacterial activity of BEF ligand and its complexes.
| Compound | Inhibition zone (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| BEF ligand | 15 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 12 |
| BEF–Cu | 21 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| BEF–Ni | 18 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 20 | 15 |
| BEF–Zn | 16 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 15 |
| Standard | 26 | 28 | 26 | 25 | 27 | 28 |
| Control | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Standard: amoxicillin; control: DMSO.
Antifungal activity of BEF ligand and its complexes.
| Compound | Inhibition zone (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| BEF ligand | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 12 |
| BEF–Cu | 20 | 18 | 19 | 18 | 15 | 19 |
| BEF–Ni | 17 | 14 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 13 |
| BEF–Zn | 15 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 14 | 16 |
| Standard | 20 | 21 | 19 | 21 | 18 | 22 |
| Control | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Standard: fluconazole; control: DMSO.