| Literature DB >> 25298315 |
Azusa Someya1, Ryuki Ito, Akihiko Maeda, Mitsuhiro Ikenaga.
Abstract
The tick is a well-known vector for arthropod-borne pathogens, such as tick-borne encephalitis, Lyme disease, Japanese spotted fever and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. It is therefore important to know the tick population and distribution in our environment and wild animals in order to prevent tick-borne diseases. Here, we report the results of tick surveillance from May to September 2011 at 14 geographical points and in 5 wild boars in Kyoto City, Kyoto prefecture, Japan. We collected 3,198 ticks comprising 5 tick species, Haemaphysalis (H.) longicornis, H. flava, H. kitaokai, Amblyomma testudinarium and Dermacentor taiwanensis. Interestingly, the proportion of tick species varied according to geographical region within the city. The ticks collected in the city were reported as potential vectors of pathogens, such as rickettsiosis. We detected rickettsial DNA by PCR in 71.1% of 201 ticks investigated. The ticks that carried rickettsiae were distributed across the whole the city. The sequences of PCR-amplified DNA fragments were determined and showed similarities to spotted fever group rickettsiae. Although their pathogenicity for animals including humans is still unclear, it is important to stay alert and pay attention to tick-borne diseases in order to ensure the safety of the citizens of the city as well as that of visitors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25298315 PMCID: PMC4347921 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.Geographical representation of the tick surveillance points and tick prevalence in Kyoto City, Japan in 2011. We captured the ticks by a flagging method on the mountain slopes around the city, at locations indicated by letters A to N (A). Shaded areas indicate mountain regions. Ticks were captured in the city from May to September 2011. Ticks were also collected from wild boars hunted in Yamashina-ku (point O). The proportions of tick species collected at each surveillance point were plotted on a city map (B). The legend for tick species shown in each pie chart is given in the box in panel D. We classified tick distribution into three general areas, I, II and III, according to the proportion of tick species shown in panel B. The points at which the detection of rickettisal DNA was performed are indicated with an asterisk (*). The points where rickettisal DNA was detected are indicated with a double asterisk (**) (C). We then re-constructed the tick population graphs for each geographical area, I, II and III (D). Tick populations in each area are indicated by the size of the circle. A circle representing a population size of fifty ticks is shown in the box in panel D.
Ticks collected in the area around Kyoto City
| Plants/Wild bores | Area of Kyoto City | Collection point (Altitude) | Collection date | Tick species collected | Numbers of ticks collected | Total number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Nymph | Larva | ||||||
| Plants | I (North) | A (Keihokuyuzuki) | 9 Aug | 3 | 6 | 3 | 147 | 159 | |
| (232 m) | |||||||||
| B (Hanasetouge) | 30 Aug | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | |||
| (765 m) | |||||||||
| C (Hanasebessyo) | 30 Aug | 0 | 0 | 12 | 182 | 194 | |||
| (496 m) | |||||||||
| D (Seryoutouge) | 30 Aug | 0 | 0 | 1 | 367 | 368 | |||
| (428 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| E (Sizuhara) | 30 Aug | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1,564 | 1568 | |||
| (274 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 22 | ||||
| II (West) | F (Himuro) | 20 May, | 4 | 1 | 157 | 134 | 296 | ||
| (380 m) | 28 Jul | 0 | 0 | 15 | 14 | 29 | |||
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| G (Sawaike) | 20 May, | 8 | 8 | 72 | 0 | 88 | |||
| (370 m) | 6 Jun, | 5 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 51 | |||
| 15 Jul | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||||
| H (Arashiyama kouen) | 25 Aug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 26 | |||
| (71 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 47 | ||||
| I (Haikata) | 31 Aug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 166 | 166 | |||
| (392 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 51 | ||||
| J (Jyurin-ji) | 31 Aug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| (114 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| K (Yoshimine-dera) | 31 Aug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| (292 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| III (East) | L (Daimonji-yama) | 12 Jul | 2 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 27 | ||
| (437 m) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |||||
| M (Bisyamonn-dou) | 26 May | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 10 | |||
| (98 m) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||||
| IV (East) | N (Syougunnzuka) | 8 Sep | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| (207 m) | |||||||||
| Wild boars | O (Yamashina-ku) | 15 Jun | 10 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 21 | ||
| 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |||||
| 25 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 28 | |||||
| Total number | 66 | 61 | 346 | 2725 | 3198 | ||||
Prevalence of ticks investigated for detection of rickettsia
| Plants/ Wild boars | Area of Kyoto City | Collection point (Altitude) | Tick species | No. of ticks examined | Total No. | No. of ticks positive for rickettisaa) | No. of ticks positive for | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Nymph | |||||||
| Plants | I (North) | A (Keihokuyuzuki) | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 7 | |
| (232 m) | |||||||||
| B (Hanasetouge) | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | |||
| (765 m) | |||||||||
| C (Hanasebessyo) | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | |||
| (496 m) | |||||||||
| D (Seryoutouge) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| (428 m) | |||||||||
| E (Sizuhara) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
| (274 m) | |||||||||
| II (West) | F (Himuro) | 3 | 1 | 63 | 67 | 58 | 49 | ||
| (380 m) | |||||||||
| G (Sawaike) | 5 | 3 | 36 | 44 | 32 | 30 | |||
| (370 m) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| III (East) | L (Daimonji-yama) | 2 | 9 | 16 | 27 | 18 | 14 | ||
| (437 m) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| IV (East) | N (Syougunnzuka) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| (207 m) | |||||||||
| Wild boars | O (Yamashina-ku) | 10 | 9 | 2 | 21 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Total number | 24 | 31 | 146 | 201 | 143 | 125 | |||
a) Number of ticks which were positive in the PCR using at least one primer pair for rickettsial DNA. b) Number of ticks which were positive in the PCR using primer pair, Rj5 and Rj10.
Fig. 2.Phylogenetic tree of SFG rickettsiae isolated from ticks in Kyoto City, Japan derived from sequences of PCR fragments of the 17K antigen gene. The tree was constructed with the neighbor joint method. R17K-Ti187F represents the PCR fragments of the 17K antigen gene obtained in this study from H. longicornis. R17K-Ti016F was obtained from A. testudinarium in this study.