Literature DB >> 25297887

Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in seagulls, pigeons, dogs, and cats in Thailand.

Khuanchai Koompapong1, Hirotake Mori1, Nipa Thammasonthijarern2, Rapeepun Prasertbun1, Ai-rada Pintong1, Supaluk Popruk1, Wichit Rojekittikhun3, Kittipong Chaisiri3, Yaowalark Sukthana1, Aongart Mahittikorn1.   

Abstract

Zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp., particularly C. meleagridis, C. canis, and C. felis, are enteric protozoa responsible for major public health concerns around the world. To determine the spread of this parasite in Thailand, we conducted molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. from animal samples around the country, by collecting and investigating the feces of seagulls (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus and Chroicocephalus ridibundus), domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica), dogs, and cats. Seagull and pigeon samples were collected at the seaside and on the riverside to evaluate their potential for waterborne transmission. Ten pigeon samples were combined into one set, and a total of seven sets were collected. Seventy seagull samples were combined into one set, and a total of 13 sets were collected. In addition, 111 dog samples were collected from cattle farms, and 95 dog and 80 cat samples were collected from a temple. We identified C. meleagridis in pigeons, Cryptosporidium avian genotype III in seagulls, C. canis in dogs, and C. felis in cats. In the temple, the prevalence was 2.1% (2/95) for dogs and 2.5% (2/80) for cats. No Cryptosporidium was found in dog samples from cattle farms. These are the first findings of C. meleagridis in domestic pigeons, and Cryptosporidium avian genotype III in seagulls. Our study invites further molecular epidemiological investigations of Cryptosporidium in these animals and their environment to evaluate the public health risk in Thailand. K. Koompapong et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2014

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25297887      PMCID: PMC4190471          DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2014053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasite        ISSN: 1252-607X            Impact factor:   3.000


Introduction

Cryptosporidium, a common intestinal parasite of humans and animals, has a diverse global distribution and 30 species with >50 genotypes have been identified [47, 60]. In Europe, C. parvum and C. hominis are responsible for >95% of human cryptosporidiosis [9, 25, 51]. In the USA, Australia, and Japan, C. hominis is more prevalent than C. parvum [29, 59, 62]. C. meleagridis, C. felis, and C. canis, predominant species in birds, cats, and dogs, respectively, are generally less common than C. hominis and C. parvum [60]. In Thailand, cryptosporidiosis prevalence rates between 2.5 and 25% have been reported in HIV-infected patients in urban areas [53]. Particularly, C. meleagridis, C. felis, and C. canis have been found and are responsible for 35.2% of all Cryptosporidium infections in Thai HIV patients [11]. The risk of non-parvum zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection is considered high in Thailand, at least in immunodepressed patients. To date, Cryptosporidium has been studied in dogs [3, 31], cattle [18, 19, 35], mussels [54], and chickens in Thailand, [20], but no molecular epidemiological investigations of Cryptosporidium in animals other than ruminants have been conducted. The main objective of our study was to identify Cryptosporidium in animals, especially focusing on birds, dogs, and cats, by a molecular method. We selected seagulls and domestic pigeons, common migratory and domestic birds that live near bodies of water, making them potential sources of water contamination. Many people visit seaside piers and riverside areas in Thailand for relaxation, and these areas often act as sanctuaries for birds since bird-feeding is a favored activity among both visitors and local people. In these areas, birds gather at precise times, waiting for people to feed them. They tend to be unafraid of human presence, and this proximity risks making these places important transmission zones for zoonotic diseases. For similar reasons, dogs in cattle farms, as well as dogs and cats in a temple were selected for investigation. Stray dogs and cats are often cared for at temples in Thailand due to religious beliefs, and temples have become known as endemic places for intestinal parasitic infections in animals living there [56].

Materials and methods

Study sites and sample collection

Seagull samples were collected at Bang Poo Nature Reserve Pier, in Samut Prakan Province, central Thailand. Most seagulls were brown-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus) and black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus). These birds migrate from China in October–May each year, and the samples were collected in both 2010 and 2011. Due to the small amount of feces per dropping, fecal samples from 70 seagulls were combined into one set, and a total of 13 such sets were collected. Samples from domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) were collected in September 2012 from three locations: (1) near the pier in Wat Rakang Kositaram; (2) Brahmin Swing; (3) the Pramane Ground. All locations are in Bangkok, central Thailand. Fecal samples from 10 pigeons were combined into one set, and a total of seven sets were collected. All bird samples were collected immediately when the feces dropped to the ground. One hundred eleven dog samples were collected from 105 dairy cattle farms in central Thailand (Nakhon Pathom Province: Mueang Nakhon Pathom District; Ratchaburi Province: Photharam District, Ban Pong District; Lopburi Province: Phatthana Nikhom District; Sa Kaeo Province: Watthana Nakhon District, Mueang Sa Kaeo District, Wang Sombun District) in January–April 2012. Most of the dogs were adult. They appeared to be healthy and well fed by their owners. Dog samples were collected per rectum by experienced veterinarians. In addition, 95 samples from dogs and 80 from cats were collected from a temple in central Thailand (Ban Na District, Nakhon Nayok Province) in October 2012. About 1,000 dogs and 500 cats lived around the temple area, fed by monks and volunteers. Most of the dogs and cats were adult. Some animals were kept in cages, while others were free to roam. Dog and cat fecal samples were collected at random from the grounds. Samples from all animals were kept in dry tubes in cool conditions during transportation, and preserved at −20 °C for DNA extraction. This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Molecular analysis

DNA was extracted from the samples using a commercially available DNA extraction kit (PSP Spin Stool DNA Kit, Stratec Inc., Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This kit contains optimized essential washing conditions to remove inhibitors very efficiently. Fragments of SSU rRNA (830 bp) were amplified by PCR, using primers and protocols described previously [61]. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. All amplified products were sequenced in both directions using the secondary PCR primers on an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The Cryptosporidium species and genotypes from each specimen were confirmed by homology of the sequenced PCR products to the sequence published in GenBank.

Results

The numbers of positive samples examined for Cryptosporidium for each collection site and the Cryptosporidium species/genotypes determined by PCR analysis of the SSU rRNA gene are summarized in Table 1. Two sets from seagulls, and one set from pigeons, were found positive for Cryptosporidium spp. with 100% homology with Cryptosporidium avian genotype III and C. meleagridis in the published sequences in GenBank (AB694729 and KF701463). Cryptosporidium was not identified in the dog samples from the cattle farms but 2/95 (2.1%) dog samples and 2/80 (2.5%) cat samples from the temple were found positive for Cryptosporidium. Genotyping analysis of the PCR-positive samples identified C. canis and C. felis, respectively, with 100% homology with the published sequences in GenBank (FJ233035 and JQ413437).
Table 1.

Number of positive samples examined for Cryptosporidium for each collection site and the Cryptosporidium species/genotypes determined by PCR analysis of the SSU rRNA gene.

Type of animalCollection siteSample sizeCryptosporidium-positive (%)Cryptosporidium species/genotype
PigeonsWat Rakang Kositaram, Bangkok4 sets*1 (25%)C. meleagridis
Brahmin Swing, Bangkok2 sets* 0
The Pramane Ground, Bangkok1 set* 0
SeagullsBang Poo Nature Reserve Pier, Samut Prakan13 sets** 2 (15.3%)C. avian genotype III
DogsNakhon Pathom30
Ratchaburi270
Lopburi330
Sa Kaeo480
Nakhon Nayok952 (2.1%)C. canis
CatsNakhon Nayok802 (2.5%)C. felis

1 set = 10 fecal samples;

1 set = 70 fecal samples.

Number of positive samples examined for Cryptosporidium for each collection site and the Cryptosporidium species/genotypes determined by PCR analysis of the SSU rRNA gene. 1 set = 10 fecal samples; 1 set = 70 fecal samples.

Discussion

Some Cryptosporidium species and genotypes are more associated with human illness than others, and some may be related to specific pathogenicity in human cryptosporidiosis [47]. Previously in Thailand, Cryptosporidium infections have been reported in food (12.5% in green mussels) [54], and the environment (12.7% in the waters of southwest coastal areas of Thailand) [52]. Unfortunately, species/genotype identification was not possible in previous studies in Thailand due to the use of the indirect fluorescent-antibody method and because no species-specific monoclonal antibodies were available. Otherwise, more detailed information on genotyping, particularly for human-adapted species, would allow more precise public health risk assessments for cryptosporidiosis in the future [53]. Similarly, our previous study using the nested PCR technique targeting the SSU rRNA gene revealed that 11% of river- and 6% of sea-water samples in central Thailand were contaminated with several Cryptosporidium species, including C. parvum, C. meleagridis and C. serpentis. The highest river contamination levels occurred during the rainy season, and the highest sea-water levels corresponded with the presence of migratory seagulls, indicating that runoff water carries the parasite into the rivers/sea [23]. Therefore, it is important to investigate the influence of domestic animals as potential transmission reservoirs for Cryptosporidium, and their impact on public health. The domestic pigeon is one of the most common birds around the world. Herein, C. meleagridis was found for the first time in feces of domestic pigeons. To date, three avian Cryptosporidium species (C. meleagridis, C. baileyi, and C. galli) and 11 genotypes (avian genotypes I–V, black duck genotype, Eurasian woodcock genotype, and goose genotypes I–IV) have been reported [10, 58, 59]. Among them, C. meleagridis is pathogenic, causing diarrhea in both humans and birds [8, 41, 60]. As shown in Table 2, C. meleagridis has been identified globally in livestock, such as chickens, hens, and turkeys [2, 5, 13, 17, 33, 46, 48, 50, 55]. It has also been frequently reported in a variety of pet birds in Japan and China [1, 42]. A few studies have also found C. meleagridis in wild and domestic free-living birds [24, 30, 37].
Table 2.

Avian host and country of identification of C. meleagridis and Cryptosporidium avian genotype III, from published records.

Avian hostCountryReferences
C. meleagridisChicken and hen (Gallus gallus domesticus)USA[2, 5, 13, 17, 33, 46, 50]
Sweden
Algeria
Brazil
Tunisia
Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)USA[5, 48, 55]
Italy
Algeria
Ring-necked parrot (Psittacula krameri)Australia[30]
Cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus)Japan[1]
Red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa)China[42]
Spain[37]
Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri)[42]
Bohemian waxwing (Bombycilla garrulus)[42]
Rufous turtle dove (Streptopelia orientalis)[42]
Fan-tailed pigeon (C. l. domestica)[42]
Scale quail (Callipepla squamata)[42]
Domestic pigeon (C. l. domestica)ThailandThis study
Cryptosporidium avian genotype IIICockatiel (N. hollandicus)Australia[33, 34, 42]
Brazil
China
Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla)Australia[34]
Sun conure/parakeet (Aratinga solstitialis)Australia[34]
Canada goose (Branta canadensis)USA[21]
Red-billed blue magpie (Urocissa erythrorhyncha)China[42]
Peach-faced lovebird (Agapornis roseicollis)Brazil[33]
Brown-headed gull (C. brunnicephalus)ThailandThis study
Black-headed gull (C. ridibundus)
Avian host and country of identification of C. meleagridis and Cryptosporidium avian genotype III, from published records. Several recent studies report occurrences of Cryptosporidium in urban pigeons that are infectious to humans [15, 36, 42, 43]. Pigeons living in urban parks may be a source of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis, affecting primarily immunocompromised people, children, and the elderly [42]. We chose to collect domestic pigeon and seagull samples for this study in locations where many tourists gather to feed the birds. Our results indicate the need for further molecular epidemiological investigations of Cryptosporidium in domestic birds and their handlers, including pigeons, to evaluate the risk they pose to humans. Cryptosporidium are also well known for waterborne transmission as they are commonly found in wastewater [7, 24]. Our previous surveillance of river- and sea-water identified several Cryptosporidium species, including C. parvum, C. meleagridis, and C. serpentis [23]. The habitats of the pigeons in our study were very close to the pier and riverside, so they may cause water contamination. Cryptosporidium avian genotype III was detected in seagull samples (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus and Chroicocephalus ridibundus). Two previous studies have reported Cryptosporidium in seagulls, but this is the first study to identify Cryptosporidium genotypes in seagulls using a molecular method [40, 49]. Cryptosporidium avian genotype III has been detected in a variety of birds around the world (Table 2), such as the cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus), galah (Eolophus roseicapilla), sun conure/parakeet (Aratinga solstitialis), Canada goose (Branta canadensis), red-billed blue magpie (Urocissa erythrorhyncha), and peach-faced lovebird (Agapornis roseicollis) [21, 33, 34, 42], but has not been identified in livestock or other migratory birds. Because seagulls migrate long distances, they may be responsible for transmitting the parasite to other countries. The prevalence of zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp. varies in different regions of the world. As shown in Table 3, in dogs, C. canis was the most prevalent species in Australia [39], C. parvum in Italy [12], and C. muris in the USA [26]. Cryptosporidium prevalence in dogs varies – high infection rates (>10%) have been reported in the USA and Norway [16, 26], with lower prevalence (<2%) in the UK, Brazil, and Australia [6, 32, 39]. C. felis is the predominant species in cats [4, 38, 45], while Cryptosporidium species tend to differ by study area. In cats, rates are generally higher than dogs; infection rates > 10% have been reported in Colombia, Italy, and the USA [4, 44, 45], and are reportedly low in the UK [14, 57]. In the present study, 2 out of 95 (2.1%) dog and 2 out of 80 (2.5%) cat fecal samples were positive for Cryptosporidium. The PCR technique, capable of detecting low levels of Cryptosporidium infection, was used in this study because Cryptosporidium can be difficult to detect using conventional microscopy, as found in previous reports [27, 28]. However, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dogs and cats was low. Given the low prevalence of this parasite found in our study, we suggest that dogs and cats do not pose a serious Cryptosporidium infection risk to humans in central Thailand. We expected to detect C. parvum in the dog samples from cattle farms, due to their proximity to cattle; the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in cattle in Thailand has been reported to be 9.5–13.0% [22, 35]. However, no C. parvum was found in the dog samples from the cattle farms. The reason for this negative result is unknown; specific C. parvum subtypes may only infect dogs. Further epidemiological and subtype studies of C. parvum in dogs are required.
Table 3.

Country and Cryptosporidium species for dogs and cats, from published records.

AnimalCountryCryptosporidium species (number of identified samples)References
Dog
AustraliaC. canis (4)[39]
ItalyC. canis (1) and C. parvum (7)[12]
ThailandC. canis (2)This study
USAC. muris (6)[26]
Cat
AustraliaC. felis (18)[39]
ColombiaC. felis (5) and C. muris (1)[45]
ThailandC. felis (2)This study
USAC. felis (12)[4]
Country and Cryptosporidium species for dogs and cats, from published records. Currently, no molecular tools are available to evaluate the subtype characteristics of C. canis or C. felis; therefore, the host specificity of these species has not been fully explored. In contrast, subtype analyses are available for C. parvum, and the variety of host specificity has been reported; some subtypes (IIa, IId) are zoonotic, while another (IIc) is anthroponotic [58]. Unfortunately, C. parvum subtypes have not been reported for dogs. This study had some limitations. First, the sample size was not large enough to analyze the species/genotype characteristics in the region fully. Second, the birds’ fecal samples were combined into sets (10 samples = 1 set for pigeons, 70 samples = 1 set for seagulls), so that the actual prevalence could not be precisely determined. In view of the above findings, further studies are necessary as the number of seagulls, pigeons, dogs, and cats is very large and their proximity to humans makes contamination very likely. In conclusion, we identified C. meleagridis in pigeons, Cryptosporidium avian genotype III in seagulls, C. canis in dogs, and C. felis in cats. Our study indicates that further molecular epidemiological investigations of Cryptosporidium in animals, especially pigeons, are necessary to evaluate their possible role as reservoir hosts, and the potential risk they pose to humans.
  62 in total

1.  The changing epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in North West England.

Authors:  W Sopwith; K Osborn; R Chalmers; M Regan
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Small-intestinal cryptosporidiosis in a young pigeon.

Authors:  I A Ozkul; Y Aydin
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.378

3.  Zoonotic species of Cryptosporidium are as prevalent as the anthroponotic in HIV-infected patients in Thailand.

Authors:  W Gatei; Y Suputtamongkol; D Waywa; R W Ashford; J W Bailey; J Greensill; N J Beeching; C A Hart
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2002-12

4.  Zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium meleagridis on an organic Swedish farm.

Authors:  Charlotte Silverlås; Jens G Mattsson; Mona Insulander; Marianne Lebbad
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Identification of novel Cryptosporidium genotypes from avian hosts.

Authors:  Josephine Ng; Ivan Pavlasek; Una Ryan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The role of birds in dissemination of human waterborne enteropathogens.

Authors:  Thaddeus K Graczyk; Anna C Majewska; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2007-12-31

7.  An outbreak of disease associated with cryptosporidia on a red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) game farm.

Authors:  A Pagès-Manté; M Pagès-Bosch; N Majó-Masferrer; H Gómez-Couso; E Ares-Mazás
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.378

8.  National study of the gastrointestinal parasites of dogs and cats in Australia.

Authors:  Carlysle S Palmer; R C Andrew Thompson; Rebecca J Traub; Robert Rees; Ian D Robertson
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 9.  Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.011

10.  Molecular surveillance of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi by genotyping and subtyping parasites in wastewater.

Authors:  Na Li; Lihua Xiao; Lin Wang; Shuming Zhao; Xukun Zhao; Liping Duan; Meijin Guo; Lili Liu; Yaoyu Feng
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-09-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Cryptosporidium spp. in Columba livia Gmelin, 1789 (Columbiformes: Columbidae) free-living pigeons from urban areas in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Authors:  Carolina Caetano Dos Santos; Sara Patron da Motta; Natália Soares Martins; Andrios da Silva Moreira; Natália Nachtigall Al-Alam; Fabio Raphael Pascoti Bruhn; Jerônimo Lopes Ruas; Nara Amélia da Rosa Farias
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Guangdong Province, Southern China.

Authors:  Juan Li; Xuhui Lin; Longxian Zhang; Nanshan Qi; Shenquan Liao; Minna Lv; Caiyan Wu; Mingfei Sun
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Prevalence and diversity of intestinal parasites in household and temple pigeons (Columba livia) in central Nepal.

Authors:  Roshan Babu Adhikari; Purna Bahadur Ale; Madhuri Adhikari Dhakal; Tirth Raj Ghimire
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Cryptosporidium Infection in Java Sparrows (Lonchura oryzivora) in Northern China.

Authors:  Qiu-Xia Yao; Xiao-Xuan Zhang; Kai Chen; Jian-Gang Ma; Wen-Bin Zheng; Xiao-Qin Xu; Xing-Quan Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A retrospective molecular study of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in HIV-infected patients from Thailand.

Authors:  Anna Rosa Sannella; Yupin Suputtamongkol; Ekkarat Wongsawat; Simone M Cacciò
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  First report of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium spp. in peafowl (Pavo cristatus) in China.

Authors:  Sheng-Yong Feng; Han Chang; Jing Luo; Jing-Jing Huang; Hong-Xuan He
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Molecular prevalence and subtyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples collected from stray cats in İzmir, Turkey.

Authors:  Ahmet Efe Köseoğlu; Hüseyin Can; Muhammet Karakavuk; Mervenur Güvendi; Aysu Değirmenci Döşkaya; Pumla Bhekiwe Manyatsi; Mert Döşkaya; Adnan Yüksel Gürüz; Cemal Ün
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Global prevalence of zoonotic pathogens from pigeon birds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Md Mukthar Mia; Mahamudul Hasan; M Rashed Hasnath
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-14

9.  Prevalence and Multilocus Genotyping Analysis of Cryptosporidium and Giardia Isolates from Dogs in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Authors:  Sahatchai Tangtrongsup; A Valeria Scorza; John S Reif; Lora R Ballweber; Michael R Lappin; Mo D Salman
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 10.  Public health significance of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in wildlife: Critical insights into better drinking water management.

Authors:  Alireza Zahedi; Andrea Paparini; Fuchun Jian; Ian Robertson; Una Ryan
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.674

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.