Deeksha V Thakur, Ujjwala N Gaikwad1. 1. Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra; Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492 099, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With increasing use of soft contact lenses the incidence of contact lens induced infections is also increasing. This study was aimed to assess the knowledge of new and existing contact lens users about the risk of microbial contamination associated with improper use and maintenance of contact lenses, type of microbial flora involved and their potential to cause ophthalmic infections. METHODS: Four samples each from 50 participants (n=200) were collected from the lenses, lens care solutions, lens care solution bottles and lens cases along with a questionnaire regarding their lens use. The samples were inoculated onto sheep blood agar, Mac Conkey's agar and Sabouraud's dextrose agar. Organisms were identified using standard laboratory protocols. RESULTS: Overall rate of microbial contamination among the total samples was 52 per cent. The most and the least contaminated samples were found to be lens cases (62%) and lens care solution (42%), respectively. The most frequently isolated contaminant was Staphylococcus aureus (21%) followed by Pseudomonas species (19.5%). Majority (64%) of the participants showed medium grade of compliance to lens cleaning practices. Rate of contamination was 100 and 93.75 per cent respectively in those participants who showed low and medium compliance to lens care practices as compared to those who had high level of compliance (43.75%) (P<0.05). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Lens care practices amongst the participants were not optimum which resulted into high level contamination. Hence, creating awareness among the users about the lens care practices and regular cleaning and replacements of lens cases are required.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: With increasing use of soft contact lenses the incidence of contact lens induced infections is also increasing. This study was aimed to assess the knowledge of new and existing contact lens users about the risk of microbial contamination associated with improper use and maintenance of contact lenses, type of microbial flora involved and their potential to cause ophthalmic infections. METHODS: Four samples each from 50 participants (n=200) were collected from the lenses, lens care solutions, lens care solution bottles and lens cases along with a questionnaire regarding their lens use. The samples were inoculated onto sheep blood agar, Mac Conkey's agar and Sabouraud's dextrose agar. Organisms were identified using standard laboratory protocols. RESULTS: Overall rate of microbial contamination among the total samples was 52 per cent. The most and the least contaminated samples were found to be lens cases (62%) and lens care solution (42%), respectively. The most frequently isolated contaminant was Staphylococcus aureus (21%) followed by Pseudomonas species (19.5%). Majority (64%) of the participants showed medium grade of compliance to lens cleaning practices. Rate of contamination was 100 and 93.75 per cent respectively in those participants who showed low and medium compliance to lens care practices as compared to those who had high level of compliance (43.75%) (P<0.05). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Lens care practices amongst the participants were not optimum which resulted into high level contamination. Hence, creating awareness among the users about the lens care practices and regular cleaning and replacements of lens cases are required.
Authors: Jeane Haidee Mah-Sadorra; S Gulderen Aktan Yavuz; Dany M Najjar; Peter R Laibson; Christopher J Rapuano; Elisabeth J Cohen Journal: Cornea Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Fiona Stapleton; Lisa Keay; Katie Edwards; Thomas Naduvilath; John K G Dart; Garry Brian; Brien A Holden Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Thiago Dos Santos Gomes; Angela Magnet; Fernando Izquierdo; Lucianna Vaccaro; Fernando Redondo; Sara Bueno; Maria Luisa Sánchez; Santiago Angulo; Soledad Fenoy; Carolina Hurtado; Carmen Del Aguila Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Omar S Alobaidan; Mohammed K Alkhalifah; Ammar A AlSayegh; Fahad A Alhumaid; Ahmad S Ashammery; Khalid Alghamdi; Ahmed Mousa; Rajiv Khandekar; Waleed AlRashid Journal: Saudi J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: Saad K Boqursain; Ahmed S Al-Hussain; Adeeb A Al Mubarak; Dawood S Al-Bujays; Manayer Al-Mustahi Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2021-11-05