| Literature DB >> 25296565 |
Juan Sun1, Zhang Rong2, Najina Wugeti3, Adila Azhati3, Yujun GUo3, Haili Liu3, Ruping Qian3, Long Zhao3, Yitong Ma3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the establishment of a rapid atrial pacing (RAP)-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) model with electrophotoluminescence and the application of ultrasonic backscatter quantitative analysis of the degree of myocardial fibrosis in New Zealand white rabbits.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25296565 PMCID: PMC4206398 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.891242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The new zealand rabbit normal electrocardiograms recorded recorded by electrophysiologic and body surface electrocardiogram.
Figure 2The new zealand rabbit electrocardiograms of the right atrial pacing recorded by electrophysiologic and body surface electrocardiogram.
Figure 3Pathology slides of fibrosis in the right auricular tissue from both groups of rabbits (Masson, ×400). (A) Shows a small quantity of collagenous fibers blue in the sham-operated group; (B) shows a large quantity of collagenous fibers and stained bluish green in the rapid atrial pacing group.
Figure 4Immunohistochemistry of collagen I protein in the right auricular tissue from both groups of rabbits (SP, ×400). (A) Shows weakly positive collagen I expression in the sham-operated group; (B) shows strongly positive collagen I expression in the rapid atrial pacing group.
Figure 5Immunohistochemistry of collagen III protein in the right auricular tissue from both groups of rabbits (SP, ×400). (A) Shows weakly positive collagen III expression in the sham-operated group; (B) shows strongly positive collagen III expression in the rapid atrial pacing group.
Comparion of AII and CVIB in two groups (n=8, χ̄±s).
| Groups | AII | CVIB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial septal | The posterior wall of the right atrium | Atrial septal | The posterior wall of the right atrium | |
| Sham operation group | 8.24±0.85 | 7.58±0.56 | 2.78±0.86 | 3.12±0.65 |
| Pacing group | 15.56±1.30 | 16.60±2.45 | 1.08±0.13 | 1.56±0.15 |
Compared with Sham operation group,
P<0.05.